| Literature DB >> 26120910 |
David Kellen1, Karl Christoph Klauer2.
Abstract
An ongoing discussion in the recognition-memory literature concerns the question of whether recognition judgments reflect a direct mapping of graded memory representations (a notion that is instantiated by signal detection theory) or whether they are mediated by a discrete-state representation with the possibility of complete information loss (a notion that is instantiated by threshold models). These 2 accounts are usually evaluated by comparing their (penalized) fits to receiver operating characteristic data, a procedure that is predicated on substantial auxiliary assumptions, which if violated can invalidate results. We show that the 2 accounts can be compared on the basis of critical tests that invoke only minimal assumptions. Using previously published receiver operating characteristic data, we show that confidence-rating judgments are consistent with a discrete-state account. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26120910 DOI: 10.1037/a0039251
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychol Rev ISSN: 0033-295X Impact factor: 8.934