| Literature DB >> 30947717 |
Prisca A Kweyamba1, Denis Zofou2, Noella Efange2, Jules-Clement N Assob2, Jovin Kitau1, Mramba Nyindo3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Traditional medicinal plants are one of the potential sources of anti-malarial drugs and there is an increasing interest in the use and development of traditional herbal remedies for the treatment of malaria and other ailments. This study was carried out with the aim to investigate the phytochemical screening, cytotoxic effect and antiplasmodial activities of Dichrostachys cinerea and Commiphora africana. Both plants are used by the Maasai in Tanzania in suspected malaria and other diseases. No previous work appears to have investigated the potential anti-malarial activity of the two plants.Entities:
Keywords: Antimalarial and cytotoxicity; Commiphora africana; Dichrostachys cinerea; Phytochemical screening
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30947717 PMCID: PMC6449979 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-019-2752-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Preliminary phytochemical results for Dichrostachys cinerea and Commiphora africana
| Phytochemical constituents | DCM extracts | MeOH extracts | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAS | CAB | DCS | DCB | CAS | CAB | DCS | DCB | |
| Alkaloids | − | − | − | − | ++ | + | − | − |
| Steroids | + ++ | +++ | ++ | + | − | − | − | − |
| Cardiac glycosides | + | − | − | − | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ |
| Flavonoids | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ |
| Tannins | − | − | − | − | +++ | +++ | +++ | − |
| Triterpenoids | − | − | − | − | +++ | ++ | +++ | ++ |
| Saponins | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | + | +++ |
CAS: Commiphora africana whole stem; CAB: Commiphora africana stem bark; DCS: Dichrostachys cinerea whole stem; DCB: Dichrostachys cinerea stem bark; (+++): strongly present; (++): moderately present; (+): weakly present; (−): absent
In vitro antiplasmodial activity and cytotoxicity of crude extracts from Dichrostachys cinerea and Commiphora africana
| Extract | IC50 on D6 (µg/mL ± SD) | IC50 on Dd2 (µg/mL ± SD) | CC50 on LLC-MK2 (µg/mL ± SD) | Selectivity index by D6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAB-DCM |
| > 1000 | > 1000 |
|
| CAS-DCM | > 1000 | > 1000 | > 1000 | ND |
| CAB-MeOH | > 1000 | > 1000 | > 1000 | ND |
| CAS-MeOH | > 1000 | > 1000 | 74.56 | ND |
| DCB-DCM |
|
| 34.65 ± 8.36 | 14.63 |
| DCS-DCM |
| > 1000 |
|
|
| DCB-MeOH | > 1000 | > 1000 | > 1000 | ND |
| DCS-MeOH |
| > 1000 | 178.35 ± 371.30 | 60.24 |
| QN |
|
| ||
| Triton X-100 |
|
Italic values represent anti-plasmodial activity
Plant part: CAS: Commiphora africana whole stem; CAB: Commiphora africana stem bark; DCS: Dichrostachys cinerea whole stem; DCB: Dichrostachys cinerea stem bark
QN: quinine; ND: not determined; SD: standard deviation
In vivo anti-malarial activities of crude extract of Dichrostachys cinerea and Commiphora africana in the Peters’ suppressive test
| Treatment | Parasite suppression rate (%) | Change in body weight (initial–final in grams) | Mean survival days |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.00 | − 17.9% (23.5 ± 1.1–19.3.0 ± 1.4) | 12.2 ± 2.5 |
| CAB-DCM | 64.24 ± 1.43 | 5.8% (22.4 ± 0.6–23.7 ± 1.2) | 23.0 ± 3.5 |
| DCB-DCM | 53.12 ± 2.02 | 3.9% (22.1 ± 1.0–22.9 ± 1.1) | 22.3 ± 3.05 |
| Quinine | 96.02 ± 5.00 | 7.2% (20.8 ± 1.5–22.3 ± 1.0) | 28.0 ± 0.0 |
Mean and standard deviation values were generated from five replicates of each assay
CAB-DCM: dichloromethane extract of Commiphora africana bark; DCB-DCM: dichloromethane extract of Dichrostachys cinerea bark