| Literature DB >> 35219319 |
Prapaporn Chaniad1, Arisara Phuwajaroanpong1, Tachpon Techarang1, Natharinee Horata2, Arnon Chukaew3, Chuchard Punsawad4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Novel potent antimalarial agents are urgently needed to overcome the problem of drug-resistant malaria. Herbal treatments are of interest because plants are the source of many pharmaceutical compounds. The Mahanil-Tang-Thong formulation is a Thai herbal formulation in the national list of essential medicines and is used for the treatment of fever. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the antimalarial activity of medicinal plants in the Mahanil-Tang-Thong formulation.Entities:
Keywords: Antimalarial activity; Mahanil-Tang-Thong formulation; Malaria; Medicinal plants; Toxicity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35219319 PMCID: PMC8882293 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-022-03531-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Med Ther ISSN: 2662-7671
List of medicinal plants of the Mahanil-Tang-Thong formulation used in this study
| Plant species | Family | Plant part | Voucher number |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arecaceae | Stem | SMD 198012003 | |
| Dracaenaceae | Wood | SMD 096001007 | |
| Leguminosae - Mimosoidaea | Seed kernel | SMD 147008003 | |
| Myristicaceae | Wood | SMD 177001003 | |
| Lamiaceae | Aerial part | SMD 142031002 | |
| Sapindaceae | Fruit | SMD 241019001 | |
| Anacardiaceae | Seed | SMD 011018005 | |
| Lamiaceae | Wood | SMD 142036001 | |
| Menispermaceae | Leaf | SMD 170014001 |
The yield percentages of the aqueous and ethanolic crude extracts of medicinal plants in the Mahanil-Tang-Thong formulation
| Plant species | Yield (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Aqueous extract | Ethanolic extract | |
| 2.11 | 3.52 | |
| 12.44 | 20.73 | |
| 19.93 | 4.50 | |
| 2.22 | 5.75 | |
| 2.07 | 3.45 | |
| 18.14 | 30.23 | |
| 1.91 | 3.18 | |
| 2.65 | 4.42 | |
| 2.80 | 4.67 | |
Phytochemical constituents of the crude extracts of medicinal plants in the Mahanil-Tang-Thong formulation
| Medicinal plants | Extract | Phytochemical constituents | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | TP | AL | TN | AN | CG | SN | CR | ||
| Ethanolic | + | + | – | + | – | – | ++ | + | |
| Aqueous | + | – | + | + | – | – | ++ | + | |
| Ethanolic | ++ | + | – | – | – | – | – | + | |
| Aqueous | ++ | + | – | + | – | – | – | + | |
| Ethanolic | – | + | + | ++ | – | – | – | – | |
| Aqueous | – | – | – | + | – | – | ++ | + | |
| Ethanolic | – | +++ | – | – | – | – | – | + | |
| Aqueous | ++ | + | ++ | + | – | – | + | + | |
| Ethanolic | + | – | ++ | ++ | – | – | + | + | |
| Aqueous | – | – | ++ | ++ | – | – | + | – | |
| Ethanolic | – | – | + | – | – | – | +++ | – | |
| Aqueous | + | – | – | + | – | – | + | + | |
| Ethanolic | – | + | – | + | – | – | – | + | |
| Aqueous | – | + | + | ++ | – | – | – | + | |
| Ethanolic | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Aqueous | + | – | + | ++ | – | – | ++ | + | |
| Ethanolic | – | – | – | + | – | – | + | – | |
| Aqueous | ++ | – | +++ | + | – | – | + | ||
+++, Strong presence; ++, moderate presence; +, slight presence; −, absence
FL Flavonoid, TP Terpenoid, AL Alkaloids, TN Tannin, AN Anthraquinone, CG Cardiac glycosides, SN Saponins, CR coumarin
In vitro antimalarial activity and cytotoxicity of medicinal plants in the Mahanil-Tang-Thong formulation
| Medicinal Plant | Extract | pLDH: IC50 (μg/ml) | MTT: CC50 (μg/ml) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ethanolic | 22.32 ± 0.00 | 54.69 ± 2.96 | |
| Aqueous | 52.37 ± 0.05 | >80 | |
| Ethanolic | 10.47 ± 0.00 | 55.67 ± 3.28 | |
| Aqueous | 104.00 ± 0.00 | >80 | |
| Ethanolic | 365.40 ± 0.02 | >80 | |
| Aqueous | 203.60 ± 0.02 | 42.64 ± 0.14 | |
| Ethanolic | 8.87 ± 0.00 | >80 | |
| Aqueous | 46.36 ± 0.01 | >80 | |
| Ethanolic | 24.49 ± 0.01 | >80 | |
| Aqueous | 549.30 ± 0.07 | >80 | |
| Ethanolic | 75.76 ± 0.00 | 41.11 ± 1.13 | |
| Aqueous | 90.84 ± 0.02 | 43.52 ± 2.06 | |
| Ethanolic | 2.46 ± 0.69 | 48.03 ± 0.04 | |
| Aqueous | 49.94 ± 0.00 | >80 | |
| Ethanolic | 3.21 ± 0.00 | 29.11 ± 1.10 | |
| Aqueous | 120.00 ± 0.03 | >80 | |
| Ethanolic | 116.50 ± 0.01 | >80 | |
| Aqueous | 117.00 ± 0.02 | >80 | |
| Mahanil-Tang-Thong formulation | Ethanolic | 37.63 ± 1.05 | 28.50 ± 2.39 |
| Aqueous | 100.49 ± 1.05 | 250.95 ± 5.25 | |
| Artesunate | – | 1.28 ± 0.71 | ND |
| Doxorubicin | – | ND | 1.23 ± 0.16 |
ND Not determined
Parasitemia suppressive activity of the ethanolic wood extract of M. fragrans
| Group | Dose (mg/ml) | % Parasitemia | % Suppression |
|---|---|---|---|
| Negative control group | – | 64.25 ± 0.57b, d, e | – |
| Artesunate | 6 | 2.56 ± 0.83a, c, d, e | 96.02 ± 1.35 |
| Extract | 200 | 58.73 ± 0.72b, d, e | 8.59 ± 1.12 |
| 400 | 44.33 ± 0.85a, b, c, e | 31.00 ± 1.32 | |
| 600 | 30.47 ± 0.87a, b, c, d | 52.58 ± 1.35 |
The data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 5 per group)
aCompared to negative control
bCompared to artesunate
cCompared to 200 mg/kg extract
dCompared to 400 mg/kg extract
eCompared to 600 mg/kg extract, p < 0.05
Body weight change in the 4-day suppressive test of the ethanolic wood extract of M. fragrans
| Group | Dose (mg/kg) | Day 0 (g) | Day 4 (g) | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative control group | – | 36.56 ± 1.25 | 35.17 ± 1.23 | −3.82 ± 0.73b, d, e |
| Artesunate | 6 | 35.95 ± 2.02 | 38.25 ± 2.07 | 6.42 ± 1.61a, c, d, e |
| Extract | 200 | 35.91 ± 2.54 | 33.96 ± 2.31 | −5.39 ± 1.50b, d, e |
| 400 | 35.23 ± 2.49 | 34.52 ± 2.81 | −2.06 ± 1.69a, b, c | |
| 600 | 34.23 ± 1.40 | 33.93 ± 1.35 | −0.89 ± 0.18a, b, c |
The data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 5 per group)
aCompared to negative control
bCompared to artesunate
cCompared to 200 mg/kg extract
dCompared to 400 mg/kg extract
eCompared to 600 mg/kg extract, p < 0.05
Biochemical profile of liver and kidney functions of the infected untreated group and the group treated with the ethanolic extract of M. fragrans
| Untreated group | 67.00 ± 5.43 | 27.80 ± 6.53 | 83.26 ± 3.18 |
| 7% Tween 80 | 84.40 ± 1.82 a | 27.00 ± 2.00 | 72.30 ± 2.93 |
| 2000 mg/kg extract | 92.60 ± 8.14 a | 24.80 ± 2.28 | 110.22 ± 19.30 a, b |
| Untreated group | 20.42 ± 1.71 | 0.53 ± 0.03 | |
| 7% Tween 80 | 19.22 ± 1.69 | 0.56 ± 0.02 | |
| 2000 mg/kg extract | 21.64 ± 0.59 | 0.56 ± 0.03 | |
aSignificantly different from the untreated group
bSignificantly different from 7% Tween 80 (negative control group) (p < 0.05)
Fig. 1Histopathological study of liver and kidney tissues. Representative image of H&E staining of the liver and kidneys from the untreated group (a) and (d), the negative control group (b) and (e) and the extract-treated groups treated with 2000 mg/kg ethanolic M. fragrans extract (c) and (f). All images are 400× magnification. Bars, 20 μm; details showing (T), tubules, (G), glomerulus, (CV), central vein, and (H), hepatocyte