Literature DB >> 29181504

Patient-Sharing Networks of Physicians and Health Care Utilization and Spending Among Medicare Beneficiaries.

Bruce E Landon1,2, Nancy L Keating1,3, Jukka-Pekka Onnela4, Alan M Zaslavsky1, Nicholas A Christakis5, A James O'Malley6.   

Abstract

Importance: Physicians are embedded in informal networks in which they share patients, information, and behaviors. Objective: We examined the association between physician network properties and health care spending, utilization, and quality of care among Medicare beneficiaries. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cross-sectional study, we applied methods from social network analysis to Medicare administrative data from 2006 to 2010 for an average of 3 761 223 Medicare beneficiaries per year seen by 40 241 physicians practicing in 51 hospital referral regions (HRRs) to identify networks of physicians linked by shared patients. We improved on prior methods by restricting links to physicians who shared patients for distinct episodes of care, thereby excluding potentially spurious linkages between physicians treating common patients but for unrelated reasons. We also identified naturally occurring communities of more tightly linked physicians in each region. We examined the relationship between network properties measured in the prior year and outcomes in the subsequent year using regression models. Main Outcomes and Measures: Spending on total medical services, hospital, physician, and other services, use of services, and quality of care.
Results: The mean patient age across the 5 years of study was 72.3 years and 58.5% of the participants were women. The mean age across communities of included physicians was 49 years and approximately 78% were men. Mean total annual spending per patient was $10 051. Total spending was higher for patients of physicians with more connections to other physicians ($1009 for a 1-standard deviation increase, P < .001) and more shared care outside of their community ($172, P < .001). Spending on inpatient care was slightly lower for patients of physicians whose communities had higher proportions of primary care physicians (-$38, P < .001). Patients cared for by physicians linked to more physicians also had more hospital admissions and days (0.02 and 0.18, respectively; both P < .001 for a 1-standard deviation increase in the number of connected physicians), more emergency visits (0.02, P < .001), more visits to specialists (0.37, P < .001), and more primary care visits (0.11, P < .001). Patients whose physicians' networks had more primary care physicians had more primary care visits (0.44, P < .001) and fewer specialist and emergency visits (-0.33 [P < .001] and -0.008 [P = .008], respectively). The various measures of quality were inconsistently related to the network measures. Conclusions and Relevance: Characteristics of physicians' networks and the position of physicians in the network were associated with overall spending and utilization of services for Medicare beneficiaries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29181504      PMCID: PMC5833496          DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.5034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  16 in total

1.  Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks.

Authors:  M E J Newman
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2004-06-18

2.  Clarifying sources of geographic differences in Medicare spending.

Authors:  Stephen Zuckerman; Timothy Waidmann; Robert Berenson; Jack Hadley
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Using administrative data to identify naturally occurring networks of physicians.

Authors:  Bruce E Landon; Jukka-Pekka Onnela; Nancy L Keating; Michael L Barnett; Sudeshna Paul; Alistair J O'Malley; Thomas Keegan; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 1: the content, quality, and accessibility of care.

Authors:  Elliott S Fisher; David E Wennberg; Thérèse A Stukel; Daniel J Gottlieb; F L Lucas; Etoile L Pinder
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 2: health outcomes and satisfaction with care.

Authors:  Elliott S Fisher; David E Wennberg; Thérèse A Stukel; Daniel J Gottlieb; F L Lucas; Etoile L Pinder
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Physician social networks and variation in prostate cancer treatment in three cities.

Authors:  Craig Evan Pollack; Gary Weissman; Justin Bekelman; Kaijun Liao; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Mapping physician networks with self-reported and administrative data.

Authors:  Michael L Barnett; Bruce E Landon; A James O'Malley; Nancy L Keating; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Relationship between number of medical conditions and quality of care.

Authors:  Takahiro Higashi; Neil S Wenger; John L Adams; Constance Fung; Martin Roland; Elizabeth A McGlynn; David Reeves; Steven M Asch; Eve A Kerr; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Variation in patient-sharing networks of physicians across the United States.

Authors:  Bruce E Landon; Nancy L Keating; Michael L Barnett; Jukka-Pekka Onnela; Sudeshna Paul; A James O'Malley; Thomas Keegan; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Factors associated with geographic variation in cost per episode of care for three medical conditions.

Authors:  Jack Hadley; James D Reschovsky; James A O'Malley; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2014-05-09
View more
  38 in total

1.  Physician network position and patient outcomes following implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy.

Authors:  Erika L Moen; Julie P Bynum; Jonathan S Skinner; Alistair J O'Malley
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Comparing methods of grouping hospitals.

Authors:  Jordan Everson; John M Hollingsworth; Julia Adler-Milstein
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Use of Medicare Data to Identify Team-based Primary Care: Is it Possible?

Authors:  Yong-Fang Kuo; Mukaila A Raji; Yu-Li Lin; Margaret E Ottenbacher; Daniel Jupiter; James S Goodwin
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Identifying Key Players in the Care Process of Patients with Diabetes Using Social Network Analysis and Administrative Data.

Authors:  Mina Ostovari; Denny Yu; Charlotte Joy Steele-Morris
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-12-05

5.  Data-driven modeling of diabetes care teams using social network analysis.

Authors:  Mina Ostovari; Charlotte-Joy Steele-Morris; Paul M Griffin; Denny Yu
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 6.  A Network Approach to Stroke Systems of Care.

Authors:  Kori S Zachrison; Amar Dhand; Lee H Schwamm; Jukka-Pekka Onnela
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2019-08-13

7.  Healthcare network analysis of patients with diabetes and their physicians.

Authors:  James Davis; Eunjung Lim; Deborah A Taira; John Chen
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  Influence of Peer Physicians on Intensity of End-of-Life Care for Cancer Decedents.

Authors:  Nancy L Keating; Alistair James O'Malley; Jukka-Pekka Onnela; Stacy W Gray; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  An empiric approach to identifying physician peer groups from claims data: An example from breast cancer care.

Authors:  Jeph Herrin; Pamela R Soulos; Xiao Xu; Cary P Gross; Craig Evan Pollack
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Provider Network Structure and Black-to-White Disparity Gaps for Medicare Patients with Diabetes: County-Level Analysis of Cost, Utilization, and Clinical Care.

Authors:  Sebastian Linde; Leonard E Egede
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.