| Literature DB >> 30934802 |
Henry P H Lai1,2,3, Rosalin M Miles4,5,6, Shannon S D Bredin7,8,9, Kai L Kaufman10,11,12, Charlie Z Y Chua13,14,15, Jan Hare16,17, Moss E Norman18, Ryan E Rhodes19, Paul Oh20, Darren E R Warburton21,22,23.
Abstract
Community-based and Indigenous-led health and wellness approaches have been widely advocated for Indigenous peoples. However, remarkably few Indigenous designed and led interventions exist within the field. The purpose of this study was to evaluate an Indigenous-led and community-based health and wellness intervention in a remote and rural Indigenous community. This protocol was designed by and for Indigenous peoples based on the aspirations of the community (established through sharing circles). A total of 15 participants completed a 13-week walking and healthy lifestyle counselling program (incorporating motivational interviewing) to enhance cardiometabolic health. Measures of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA; 7-day accelerometry and self-report), predicted maximal aerobic power (VO₂max; 6-min walk test), resting heart rate and blood pressure, and other health-related physical fitness measures (musculoskeletal fitness and body composition) were taken before and after the intervention. The intervention led to significant (p < 0.05) improvements in VO₂max (7.1 ± 6.3 % change), with the greatest improvements observed among individuals with lower baseline VO₂max (p < 0.05, r = -0.76). Resting heart rate, resting systolic blood pressure, and resting diastolic blood pressure decreased significantly (p < 0.05) after the intervention. Self-reported and accelerometry-measured frequency of MVPA increased significantly (p < 0.05), and the total MVPA minutes (~275 min/week) were above international recommendations. Change in VO₂max was significantly correlated with change in self-reported (r = 0.42) and accelerometry-measured (r = 0.24) MVPA minutes. No significant changes were observed in weight, body mass index, waist circumference, body fat (via bioelectrical impedance), grip strength, and flexibility. These findings demonstrate that a culturally relevant and safe, community-based, Indigenous-led, health and wellness intervention can lead to significant and clinically relevant improvements in cardiometabolic health and physical activity behaviour, with the greatest changes being observed in the least active/fit individuals.Entities:
Keywords: Indigenous; behaviour; cardiometabolic; cardiorespiratory; community; exercise; fitness; health; lifestyle counselling; motivational interviewing; wellness
Year: 2019 PMID: 30934802 PMCID: PMC6517932 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8040422
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Example 13-week exercise prescription.
| Program Stage | Week | Frequency (days/week) | Intensity | Duration (min) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| %HRR | RPE | Breathing Rate | ||||
| 1 | 3 | 40–50 | 3–4 | Slightly increased | 15–20 | |
| 2 | 3 | 40–50 | 3–4 | Slightly increased | 20–25 | |
| 3 | 3 | 50–60 | 3–5 | Noticeably increased | 20–25 | |
| 4 | 3 | 50–60 | 3–5 | Noticeably increased | 25–30 | |
| 5–7 | 4 | 60–70 | 3–4 | Noticeably increased | 25–30 | |
| 8–10 | 4 | 60–70 | 3–4 | Noticeably increased | 30–35 | |
| 11–13 | 3–5 | 65–75 | 3–5 | Noticeably increased | 30–35 | |
HRR: heart rate reserve; RPE: rating of perceived exertion (ten-point scale) [32].
Change in predicted maximal aerobic power (VO2max) based on 6MWT.
| Fitness Group | Age | 6MWT Distance | VO2max | ΔVO2max | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | |||
| Least Fit ( | 46.8 ± 5.5 | 439.0 ± 31.5 | 470.2 ± 18.1 | 20.7 ± 3.5 | 23.1 ± 3.6 ** | 13.3 ± 2.4 ** |
| Unfit ( | 36.2 ± 5.0 | 569.0 ± 24.1 | 545.0 ± 24.1 | 34.9 ± 2.0 | 35.9 ± 2.4 | 2.7 ± 1.7 |
| Moderately Fit ( | 48.6 ± 7.1 | 487.4 ± 19.8 | 496.2 ± 27.3 | 32.4 ± 1.6 | 34.1 ± 1.7 | 5.3 ± 1.8 |
| Overall ( | 43.9 ± 3.5 | 498.5 ± 19.8 | 503.8 ± 15.0 | 29.3 ± 2.1 | 31.0 ± 2.1 * | 7.1 ± 1.6 * |
6MWT: 6-min walk test; * main effect for intervention p < 0.05 (Mean ± SE); ** significant interaction effect.
Figure 1Means and standard error bars are represented, * cp < 0.05. (a) The greatest improvement in VO2max (~13%) was observed in the group with an average baseline VO2max below the 25th percentile of the norm. This increase was significantly greater than improvements observed in fitness groups with average baseline VO2max values near the 50th percentile of the norm. (b) Lower baseline fitness was associated (p < 0.05, r = −0.76) with greater improvements in VO2max.
Change in resting heart rate and blood pressure.
| Fitness Group | Resting Heart Rate | Resting SBP | Resting DBP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | |
| Least Fit ( | 84.8 ± 4.3 | 76.4 ± 5.6 * | 135.0 ± 8.3 | 126.8 ± 5.4 | 85.6 ± 4.1 | 76.2 ± 5.9 |
| Unfit ( | 79.4 ± 5.7 | 69.2 ± 3.7 * | 127.2 ± 5.7 | 113.2 ± 3.1 | 79.8 ± 3.7 | 74.2 ± 2.3 |
| Moderately Fit ( | 77.2 ± 3.8 | 70.4 ± 2.4 * | 110.8 ± 3.3 | 109.8 ± 2.7 | 67.8 ± 2.9 | 63.0 ± 4.2 |
| Overall ( | 80.5 ± 2.6 | 72.0 ± 2.4 * | 124.3 ± 4.2 | 116.6 ± 2.9 * | 77.7 ± 2.8 | 71.1 ± 2.8 * |
SBP: systolic blood pressure, DBP: diastolic blood pressure, * p < 0.05 (Mean ± SE)
Change in anthropometric and musculoskeletal outcomes (Mean ± SE).
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Least Fit ( | 99.5 ± 5.7 | 99.2 ± 5.7 | 37.2 ± 2.0 | 37.1 ± 2.0 | 119.2 ± 5.2 | 117.8 ± 3.9 |
| Unfit ( | 79.7 ± 4.2 | 81.2 ± 4.0 | 28.4 ± 3.0 | 28.9 ± 3.0 | 101.0 ± 5.0 | 103.1 ± 4.7 |
| Moderately Fit ( | 65.2 ± 4.2 | 64.6 ± 4.2 | 26.2 ± 1.1 | 25.9 ± 1.2 | 94.9 ± 3.3 | 93.0 ± 2.6 |
| Overall ( | 81.5 ± 4.5 | 81.7 ± 4.5 | 30.6 ± 1.7 | 30.7 ± 1.7 | 105.0 ± 3.7 | 104.6 ± 3.4 |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Least Fit ( | 60.6 ± 7.1 | 59.8 ± 7.0 | 24.0 ± 3.1 | 23.3 ± 3.6 | 49.2 ± 1.6 | 49.4 ± 1.4 |
| Unfit ( | 71.2 ± 5.9 | 73.6 ± 3.3 | 26.1 ± 3.2 | 27.8 ± 2.5 | 34.6 ± 6.0 | 35.7 ± 5.9 |
| Moderately Fit ( | 52.4 ± 7.3 | 47.6 ± 6.5 | 31.3 ± 1.7 | 31.0 ± 3.0 | 34.7 ± 2.4 | 34.2 ± 2.4 |
| Overall ( | 61.4 ± 4.2 | 60.3 ± 4.2 | 25.7 ± 1.7 | 27.1 ± 1.8 | 39.8 ± 2.7 | 40.1 ± 2.6 |
Change in accelerometry-measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) frequency and time.
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Least Fit ( | 16.0 ± 11.1 | 15.7 ± 8.8 | 240.0 ± 167.0 | 235.0 ± 132.5 | -0.7 ± 5.0 |
| Unfit ( | 13.7 ± 4.3 | 22.0 ± 9.6 | 205.0 ± 63.8 | 330.0 ± 144.1 | 17.9 ± 11.5 |
| Moderately Fit ( | 14.8 ± 6.4 | 17.8 ± 5.9 | 222.0 ± 95.7 | 267.0 ± 87.9 | 6.4 ± 8.6 |
| Overall ( | 14.8 ± 3.9 | 18.4 ± 4.0 | 222.3 ± 58.5 | 275.5 ± 60.2 | 7.6 ± 5.2 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Least Fit ( | 2.3 ± 1.9 | 5.0 ± 3.1 | 70.0 ± 55.7 | 150.0 ± 91.7 | 11.4 ± 5.2 |
| Unfit ( | 3.3 ± 0.3 | 5.0 ± 2.0 | 100.0 ± 10.0 | 150.0 ± 60.0 | 7.1 ± 7.1 |
| Moderately Fit ( | 2.0 ± 1.5 | 4.2 ± 1.5 | 60.0 ± 46.5 | 126.0 ± 43.9 | 9.4 ± 8.1 |
| Overall ( | 2.4 ± 0.8 | 4.6 ± 1.1 * | 73.6 ± 24.4 | 139.1 ± 31.9 * | 9.4 ± 4.0 * |
* main effect for intervention p < 0.05 (Mean ± SE).
Figure 2Means and standard error bars are represented, * p < 0.05. (a) Accelerometry-measured time spent in completing MVPA bouts ≥30 min increased significantly by ~17% (~nine min/day). Total time spent in MVPA bouts ≥ 15 min (including MVPA bouts ≥ 30 min) was above international recommendations of 150 min/week (represented by the dashed line). (b) A positive correlation (p < 0.05, r = 0.42) was observed between change in self-reported MVPA time and change in VO2max.
Change in self-reported MVPA time.
| Fitness Group | MVPA Time (min/week) | |
|---|---|---|
| Pre | Post | |
| Least Fit ( | 89 ± 17 | 184 ± 19 * |
| Unfit ( | 316 ± 55 | 508 ± 70 * |
| Moderately Fit ( | 118 ± 27 | 392 ± 73 |
| Overall ( | 174 ± 52 | 361 ± 79 * |
* p < 0.05 (Mean ± SE).