Literature DB >> 26112238

Methods to estimate aspects of physical activity and sedentary behavior from high-frequency wrist accelerometer measurements.

John Staudenmayer1, Shai He2, Amanda Hickey3, Jeffer Sasaki3, Patty Freedson3.   

Abstract

This investigation developed models to estimate aspects of physical activity and sedentary behavior from three-axis high-frequency wrist-worn accelerometer data. The models were developed and tested on 20 participants (n = 10 males, n = 10 females, mean age = 24.1, mean body mass index = 23.9), who wore an ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer on their dominant wrist and an ActiGraph GT3X on the hip while performing a variety of scripted activities. Energy expenditure was concurrently measured by a portable indirect calorimetry system. Those calibration data were then used to develop and assess both machine-learning and simpler models with fewer unknown parameters (linear regression and decision trees) to estimate metabolic equivalent scores (METs) and to classify activity intensity, sedentary time, and locomotion time. The wrist models, applied to 15-s windows, estimated METs [random forest: root mean squared error (rSME) = 1.21 METs, hip: rMSE = 1.67 METs] and activity intensity (random forest: 75% correct, hip: 60% correct) better than a previously developed model that used counts per minute measured at the hip. In a separate set of comparisons, the simpler decision trees classified activity intensity (random forest: 75% correct, tree: 74% correct), sedentary time (random forest: 96% correct, decision tree: 97% correct), and locomotion time (random forest: 99% correct, decision tree: 96% correct) nearly as well or better than the machine-learning approaches. Preliminary investigation of the models' performance on two free-living people suggests that they may work well outside of controlled conditions.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ActiGraph; GT3X+; high frequency; triaxial

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26112238      PMCID: PMC4538283          DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00026.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  20 in total

1.  Estimation of energy expenditure using CSA accelerometers at hip and wrist sites.

Authors:  A M Swartz; S J Strath; D R Bassett; W L O'Brien; G A King; B E Ainsworth
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Reexamination of validity and reliability of the CSA monitor in walking and running.

Authors:  Søren Brage; Niels Wedderkopp; Paul W Franks; Lars Bo Andersen; Karsten Froberg
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  A novel method for using accelerometer data to predict energy expenditure.

Authors:  Scott E Crouter; Kurt G Clowers; David R Bassett
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2005-12-01

4.  An artificial neural network model of energy expenditure using nonintegrated acceleration signals.

Authors:  Megan P Rothney; Megan Neumann; Ashley Béziat; Kong Y Chen
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2007-07-19

5.  Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer.

Authors:  P S Freedson; E Melanson; J Sirard
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  A random forest classifier for the prediction of energy expenditure and type of physical activity from wrist and hip accelerometers.

Authors:  Katherine Ellis; Jacqueline Kerr; Suneeta Godbole; Gert Lanckriet; David Wing; Simon Marshall
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 2.833

7.  Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer.

Authors:  Richard P Troiano; David Berrigan; Kevin W Dodd; Louise C Mâsse; Timothy Tilert; Margaret McDowell
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Estimating physical activity in youth using a wrist accelerometer.

Authors:  Scott E Crouter; Jennifer I Flynn; David R Bassett
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Direct observation is a valid criterion for estimating physical activity and sedentary behavior.

Authors:  Kate Lyden; Natalia Petruski; John Staudenmayer; Patty Freedson
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2014-05

10.  Age group comparability of raw accelerometer output from wrist- and hip-worn monitors.

Authors:  Maria Hildebrand; Vincent T VAN Hees; Bjorge Hermann Hansen; Ulf Ekelund
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.411

View more
  36 in total

1.  Does Partial Meal Replacement During Pregnancy Reduce 12-Month Postpartum Weight Retention?

Authors:  Suzanne Phelan; Rena R Wing; Anna Brannen; Angelica McHugh; Todd Hagobian; Andrew Schaffner; Elissa Jelalian; Chantelle N Hart; Theresa O Scholl; Karen Muñoz-Christian; Elaine Yin; Maureen G Phipps; Sarah Keadle; Barbara Abrams
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 5.002

2.  Objective Assessment of Physical Activity: Classifiers for Public Health.

Authors:  Jacqueline Kerr; Ruth E Patterson; Katherine Ellis; Suneeta Godbole; Eileen Johnson; Gert Lanckriet; John Staudenmayer
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Randomized controlled clinical trial of behavioral lifestyle intervention with partial meal replacement to reduce excessive gestational weight gain.

Authors:  Suzanne Phelan; Rena R Wing; Anna Brannen; Angelica McHugh; Todd A Hagobian; Andrew Schaffner; Elissa Jelalian; Chantelle N Hart; Theresa O Scholl; Karen Munoz-Christian; Elaine Yin; Maureen G Phipps; Sarah Keadle; Barbara Abrams
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Classifiers for Accelerometer-Measured Behaviors in Older Women.

Authors:  Dori Rosenberg; Suneeta Godbole; Katherine Ellis; Chongzhi Di; Andrea Lacroix; Loki Natarajan; Jacqueline Kerr
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Validation of a physical activity accelerometer device worn on the hip and wrist against polysomnography.

Authors:  Kelsie M Full; Jacqueline Kerr; Michael A Grandner; Atul Malhotra; Kevin Moran; Suneeta Godoble; Loki Natarajan; Xavier Soler
Journal:  Sleep Health       Date:  2018-01-17

6.  Comparison of Accelerometry Methods for Estimating Physical Activity.

Authors:  Jacqueline Kerr; Catherine R Marinac; Katherine Ellis; Suneeta Godbole; Aaron Hipp; Karen Glanz; Jonathan Mitchell; Francine Laden; Peter James; David Berrigan
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Deep CHORES: Estimating Hallmark Measures of Physical Activity Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  Mamoun T Mardini; Subhash Nerella; Amal A Wanigatunga; Santiago Saldana; Ramon Casanova; Todd M Manini
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2021-01-25

8.  Relating wrist accelerometry measures to disability in older adults.

Authors:  Megan J Huisingh-Scheetz; Masha Kocherginsky; Elizabeth Magett; Patricia Rush; William Dale; Linda Waite
Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.250

9.  Performance of Activity Classification Algorithms in Free-Living Older Adults.

Authors:  Jeffer Eidi Sasaki; Amanda M Hickey; John W Staudenmayer; Dinesh John; Jane A Kent; Patty S Freedson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 10.  Accelerometer Data Collection and Processing Criteria to Assess Physical Activity and Other Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Practical Considerations.

Authors:  Jairo H Migueles; Cristina Cadenas-Sanchez; Ulf Ekelund; Christine Delisle Nyström; Jose Mora-Gonzalez; Marie Löf; Idoia Labayen; Jonatan R Ruiz; Francisco B Ortega
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.