OBJECTIVES: To determine optimal hand-grip strength cut points for likelihood of mobility limitation in older people and to study whether these cut points differ according to body mass index (BMI). DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of data. SETTING: Data collected in the Finnish population-based Health 2000 Survey. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand eighty-four men and 1,562 women aged 55 and older with complete data on anthropometry, hand-grip strength and self-reported mobility. MEASUREMENTS: Mobility limitation was defined as difficulty walking 0.5 km or climbing stairs. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to estimate hand-grip strength cut points for likelihood of mobility limitation. RESULTS: The overall hand-grip strength cut points for likelihood of mobility limitation were 37 kg (sensitivity 62%; specificity 76%) for men and 21 kg (sensitivity 67%; specificity 73%) for women. The effect of the interaction between hand-grip strength and BMI on mobility limitation was significant in men (P=.02), but no such interaction was observed in women (P=.16). In men, the most-optimal cutoff points were 33 kg (sensitivity 73%; specificity 79%) for normal-weight men, 39 kg (sensitivity 67%; specificity 71%) for overweight men, and 40 kg (sensitivity 57%; specificity 68%) for obese men. In women, BMI-specific hand-grip strength cutoff values was not markedly more accurate than the overall cutoff value. CONCLUSION: The hand-grip strength test is a useful tool to identify persons at risk of mobility limitation. In men, hand-grip strength cut points for mobility increased with BMI, whereas in women, only one hand-grip strength threshold was identified.
OBJECTIVES: To determine optimal hand-grip strength cut points for likelihood of mobility limitation in older people and to study whether these cut points differ according to body mass index (BMI). DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of data. SETTING: Data collected in the Finnish population-based Health 2000 Survey. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand eighty-four men and 1,562 women aged 55 and older with complete data on anthropometry, hand-grip strength and self-reported mobility. MEASUREMENTS: Mobility limitation was defined as difficulty walking 0.5 km or climbing stairs. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to estimate hand-grip strength cut points for likelihood of mobility limitation. RESULTS: The overall hand-grip strength cut points for likelihood of mobility limitation were 37 kg (sensitivity 62%; specificity 76%) for men and 21 kg (sensitivity 67%; specificity 73%) for women. The effect of the interaction between hand-grip strength and BMI on mobility limitation was significant in men (P=.02), but no such interaction was observed in women (P=.16). In men, the most-optimal cutoff points were 33 kg (sensitivity 73%; specificity 79%) for normal-weight men, 39 kg (sensitivity 67%; specificity 71%) for overweight men, and 40 kg (sensitivity 57%; specificity 68%) for obesemen. In women, BMI-specific hand-grip strength cutoff values was not markedly more accurate than the overall cutoff value. CONCLUSION: The hand-grip strength test is a useful tool to identify persons at risk of mobility limitation. In men, hand-grip strength cut points for mobility increased with BMI, whereas in women, only one hand-grip strength threshold was identified.
Authors: D M Buchner; M E Cress; B J de Lateur; P C Esselman; A J Margherita; R Price; E H Wagner Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 1997-07 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: T Rantanen; J M Guralnik; G Izmirlian; J D Williamson; E M Simonsick; L Ferrucci; L P Fried Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 1998 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: Annemarieke de Jonghe; Barbara C van Munster; Hannah E van Oosten; J Carel Goslings; Peter Kloen; Carolien van Rees; Reinder Wolvius; Romuald van Velde; Marcel M Levi; Joke C Korevaar; Sophia E de Rooij Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2011-07-05 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: H L Ong; S H S Chang; E Abdin; J A Vaingankar; A Jeyagurunathan; S Shafie; H Magadi; S A Chong; M Subramaniam Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2016 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: S Jung; N Yabushita; M Kim; S Seino; M Nemoto; Y Osuka; Y Okubo; R Figueroa; K Tanaka Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 4.075