Literature DB >> 30928637

Improving Plant Genome Editing with High-Fidelity xCas9 and Non-canonical PAM-Targeting Cas9-NG.

Zhaohui Zhong1, Simon Sretenovic2, Qiurong Ren1, Lijia Yang1, Yu Bao3, Caiyan Qi1, Mingzhu Yuan1, Yao He1, Shishi Liu1, Xiaopei Liu1, Jiaheng Wang1, Lan Huang1, Yan Wang1, Dibin Baby4, David Wang5, Tao Zhang3, Yiping Qi6, Yong Zhang7.   

Abstract

Two recently engineered SpCas9 variants, namely xCas9 and Cas9-NG, show promising potential in improving targeting specificity and broadening the targeting range. In this study, we evaluated these Cas9 variants in the model and crop plant, rice. We first tested xCas9-3.7, the most effective xCas9 variant in mammalian cells, for targeted mutagenesis at 16 possible NGN PAM (protospacer adjacent motif) combinations in duplicates. xCas9 exhibited nearly equivalent editing efficiency to wild-type Cas9 (Cas9-WT) at most canonical NGG PAM sites tested, whereas it showed limited activity at non-canonical NGH (H = A, C, T) PAM sites. High editing efficiency of xCas9 at NGG PAMs was further demonstrated with C to T base editing by both rAPOBEC1 and PmCDA1 cytidine deaminases. With mismatched sgRNAs, we found that xCas9 had improved targeting specificity over the Cas9-WT. Furthermore, we tested two Cas9-NG variants, Cas9-NGv1 and Cas9-NG, for targeting NGN PAMs. Both Cas9-NG variants showed higher editing efficiency at most non-canonical NG PAM sites tested, and enabled much more efficient editing than xCas9 at AT-rich PAM sites such as GAT, GAA, and CAA. Nevertheless, we found that Cas9-NG variants showed significant reduced activity at the canonical NGG PAM sites. In stable transgenic rice lines, we demonstrated that Cas9-NG had much higher editing efficiency than Cas9-NGv1 and xCas9 at NG PAM sites. To expand the base-editing scope, we developed an efficient C to T base-editing system by making fusion of Cas9-NG nickase (D10A version), PmCDA1, and UGI. Taken together, our work benchmarked xCas9 as a high-fidelity nuclease for targeting canonical NGG PAMs and Cas9-NG as a preferred variant for targeting relaxed PAMs for plant genome editing.
Copyright © 2019 The Author. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cas9-NG; base editing; high fidelity; non-canonical PAM; xCas9

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30928637     DOI: 10.1016/j.molp.2019.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Plant        ISSN: 1674-2052            Impact factor:   13.164


  47 in total

1.  A Novel Ternary Vector System United with Morphogenic Genes Enhances CRISPR/Cas Delivery in Maize.

Authors:  Qiang Zhang; Yu Zhang; Min-Hui Lu; Yi-Ping Chai; Yuan-Yuan Jiang; Yun Zhou; Xue-Chen Wang; Qi-Jun Chen
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 2.  Omics resources and omics-enabled approaches for achieving high productivity and improved quality in pea (Pisum sativum L.).

Authors:  Arun K Pandey; Diego Rubiales; Yonggang Wang; Pingping Fang; Ting Sun; Na Liu; Pei Xu
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  PAM-less plant genome editing using a CRISPR-SpRY toolbox.

Authors:  Qiurong Ren; Simon Sretenovic; Shishi Liu; Xu Tang; Lan Huang; Yao He; Li Liu; Yachong Guo; Zhaohui Zhong; Guanqing Liu; Yanhao Cheng; Xuelian Zheng; Changtian Pan; Desuo Yin; Yingxiao Zhang; Wanfeng Li; Liwang Qi; Chenghao Li; Yiping Qi; Yong Zhang
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 15.793

Review 4.  Improvement of base editors and prime editors advances precision genome engineering in plants.

Authors:  Kai Hua; Peijin Han; Jian-Kang Zhu
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 5.  Harnessing tissue-specific genome editing in plants through CRISPR/Cas system: current state and future prospects.

Authors:  Dhanawantari L Singha; Debajit Das; Yogita N Sarki; Naimisha Chowdhury; Monica Sharma; Jitendra Maharana; Channakeshavaiah Chikkaputtaiah
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 4.116

6.  Quantification of the affinities of CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases for cognate protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequences.

Authors:  Vladimir Mekler; Konstantin Kuznedelov; Konstantin Severinov
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Precision genome editing using cytosine and adenine base editors in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Tony P Huang; Gregory A Newby; David R Liu
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 8.  CRISPR screens in plants: approaches, guidelines, and future prospects.

Authors:  Christophe Gaillochet; Ward Develtere; Thomas B Jacobs
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 12.085

Review 9.  Advances in application of genome editing in tomato and recent development of genome editing technology.

Authors:  Xuehan Xia; Xinhua Cheng; Rui Li; Juanni Yao; Zhengguo Li; Yulin Cheng
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 5.574

10.  Knock-in and precise nucleotide substitution using near-PAMless engineered Cas9 variants in Dictyostelium discoideum.

Authors:  Yuu Asano; Kensuke Yamashita; Aoi Hasegawa; Takanori Ogasawara; Hoshie Iriki; Tetsuya Muramoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.