Literature DB >> 34962611

Harnessing tissue-specific genome editing in plants through CRISPR/Cas system: current state and future prospects.

Dhanawantari L Singha1, Debajit Das2, Yogita N Sarki2,3, Naimisha Chowdhury2, Monica Sharma2, Jitendra Maharana4,5, Channakeshavaiah Chikkaputtaiah6,7.   

Abstract

MAIN
CONCLUSION: In a nutshell, tissue-specific CRISPR/Cas genome editing is the most promising approach for crop improvement which can bypass the hurdle associated with constitutive GE such as off target and pleotropic effects for targeted crop improvement. CRISPR/Cas is a powerful genome-editing tool with a wide range of applications for the genetic improvement of crops. However, the constitutive genome editing of vital genes is often associated with pleiotropic effects on other genes, needless metabolic burden, or interference in the cellular machinery. Tissue-specific genome editing (TSGE), on the other hand, enables researchers to study those genes in specific cells, tissues, or organs without disturbing neighboring groups of cells. Until recently, there was only limited proof of the TSGE concept, where the CRISPR-TSKO tool was successfully used in Arabidopsis, tomato, and cotton, laying a solid foundation for crop improvement. In this review, we have laid out valuable insights into the concept and application of TSGE on relatively unexplored areas such as grain trait improvement under favorable or unfavorable conditions. We also enlisted some of the prominent tissue-specific promoters and described the procedure of their isolation with several TSGE promoter expression systems in detail. Moreover, we highlighted potential negative regulatory genes that could be targeted through TSGE using tissue-specific promoters. In a nutshell, tissue-specific CRISPR/Cas genome editing is the most promising approach for crop improvement which can bypass the hurdle associated with constitutive GE such as off target and pleotropic effects for targeted crop improvement.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abiotic stress; Biotic stress; CRISPR-Cas9/Cas12a; CRISPR-TSKO; Crop improvement; Tissue-specific genome editing (TSGE); Tissue-specific promoters (TSPs)

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34962611     DOI: 10.1007/s00425-021-03811-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Planta        ISSN: 0032-0935            Impact factor:   4.116


  124 in total

1.  Cloning of the chrysanthemum UEP1 promoter and comparative expression in florets and leaves of Dendranthema grandiflora.

Authors:  S Annadana; M J Beekwilder; G Kuipers; P B Visser; N Outchkourov; A Pereira; M Udayakumar; J De Jong; M A Jongsma
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Putative storage root specific promoters from cassava and yam: cloning and evaluation in transgenic carrots as a model system.

Authors:  Jacobo Arango; Bertha Salazar; Ralf Welsch; Felipe Sarmiento; Peter Beyer; Salim Al-Babili
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 4.570

3.  Pea early-browning virus-mediated genome editing via the CRISPR/Cas9 system in Nicotiana benthamiana and Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Zahir Ali; Ayman Eid; Shakila Ali; Magdy M Mahfouz
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.303

4.  Inhibition of NHEJ repair by type II-A CRISPR-Cas systems in bacteria.

Authors:  Aude Bernheim; Alicia Calvo-Villamañán; Clovis Basier; Lun Cui; Eduardo P C Rocha; Marie Touchon; David Bikard
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Regulation of DNA repair pathway choice in S and G2 phases by the NHEJ inhibitor CYREN.

Authors:  Nausica Arnoult; Adriana Correia; Jiao Ma; Anna Merlo; Sara Garcia-Gomez; Marija Maric; Marco Tognetti; Christopher W Benner; Simon J Boulton; Alan Saghatelian; Jan Karlseder
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Highly efficient genome editing by CRISPR-Cpf1 using CRISPR RNA with a uridinylate-rich 3'-overhang.

Authors:  Su Bin Moon; Jeong Mi Lee; Jeong Gu Kang; Nan-Ee Lee; Dae-In Ha; Do Yon Kim; Sun Hee Kim; Kwangsun Yoo; Daesik Kim; Jeong-Heon Ko; Yong-Sam Kim
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Structural basis of PAM-dependent target DNA recognition by the Cas9 endonuclease.

Authors:  Carolin Anders; Ole Niewoehner; Alessia Duerst; Martin Jinek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-27       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Immunity to Geminiviruses: Differential Interference and Evasion.

Authors:  Zahir Ali; Shakila Ali; Manal Tashkandi; Syed Shan-E-Ali Zaidi; Magdy M Mahfouz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Efficient targeted multiallelic mutagenesis in tetraploid potato (Solanum tuberosum) by transient CRISPR-Cas9 expression in protoplasts.

Authors:  Mariette Andersson; Helle Turesson; Alessandro Nicolia; Ann-Sofie Fält; Mathias Samuelsson; Per Hofvander
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 4.570

View more
  1 in total

1.  Application of Allele Specific PCR in Identifying Offspring Genotypes of Bi-Allelic SbeIIb Mutant Lines in Rice.

Authors:  Yongqi Jiang; Yinhui Ren; Xin Xu; Hao Wang; Cunxu Wei
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.