| Literature DB >> 30925709 |
Xiaojing Li1,2, Jie Ye3, Shoaib Munir4, Tao Yang5, Weifang Chen6, Genzhong Liu7, Wei Zheng8, Yuyang Zhang9,10.
Abstract
Ascorbic acid (AsA) has high antioxidant activities, and its biosynthesis has been well studied by engineering of a single structural gene (SG) in staple crops, such as tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). However, engineering the AsA metabolic pathway by multi-SG for biofortification remains unclear. In this study, pyramiding transgenic lines including GDP-Mannose 3',5'-epimerase (GME) × GDP-d-mannose pyrophosphorylase (GMP), GDP-l-Gal phosphorylase (GGP) × l-Gal-1-P phosphatase (GPP) and GME × GMP × GGP × GPP, were obtained by hybridization of four key genes to get over-expression transgenic plants (GME, GMP, GGP, and GPP) in tomato. Pyramiding lines exhibited a significant increase in total ascorbate in leaves and red fruits except for GGP × GPP. Expression analysis indicated that increased accumulation of AsA in pyramiding transgenic lines is due to multigene regulation in AsA biosynthesis. Substrate feeding in leaf and fruit suggested that AsA biosynthesis was mainly contributed by the d-Man/l-Gal pathway in leaves, while alternative pathways may contribute to AsA accumulation in tomato fruit. Pyramiding lines showed an enhanced light response, stress tolerance, and AsA transport capacity. Also, fruit shape, fruit size, and soluble solids were slightly affected by pyramiding. This study provides the first comprehensive analysis of gene pyramiding for ascorbate biosynthesis in tomato. SGs pyramiding promotes AsA biosynthesis, which in turn enhances light response and oxidative stress tolerance. Also, the data revealed an alternative ascorbate biosynthesis pathway between leaves and fruit of tomato.Entities:
Keywords: AsA; Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum); biosynthesis pathway; gene pyramiding; oxidative stress
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30925709 PMCID: PMC6480547 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20071558
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Relative expression of AsA biosynthesis, recycling-related genes, and ascorbate concentration in leaf and red ripe fruit of transgenic and pyramiding tomato lines. (A) Reduced and total ascorbate content in young leaf. (B) Reduced and total ascorbate contents in red ripe fruit. (C) Relative expression of AsA biosynthesis and recycling-related genes in leaf. (D) Relative expression of AsA biosynthesis and recycling-related genes of red ripe fruit. GPI (glucose-phosphate isomerase, Solyc04g076090), PMI (phosphomannose isomerase, Solyc02g086090), PMM (phosphomannomutase, Solyc05g048760), GMP (GDP-Man pyrophosphorylase, Solyc03g096730), GME1 (GDP-Man-3′,5′-epimerase 1, Solyc01g097340), GME2 (GDP-Man-3′,5′-epimerase 2, Solyc04g077020), GGP1 (GDP-l-Gal phosphorylase/l-Gal guanylyltransferase 1, Solyc06g073320), GGP2 (GDP-l-Gal phosphorylase/l-Gal guanylyltransferase 2, Solyc02g091510), GPP1 (l-Gal 1-phosphate phosphatase 1, Solyc04g014800), GPP2 (l-Gal 1-phosphate phosphatase 2, Solyc11g012410), GalDH (l-Gal dehydrogenase, Solyc01g106450), GLDH (l-GalL dehydrogenase, Solyc10g079470), MIOX (myo-inositol oxygenase, Solyc12g008650), MDHAR1 (monodehydroascorbate reductase, Solyc09g009390), DHAR1 (dehydroascorbate reductase, Solyc05g054760). Three replicate experiments were performed. Error bars represent standard error, means ± SE. FW, fresh weight. The asterisks represented significant differences from wild type (AC), as indicated by the t-test (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01).
Effect of feeding AsA biosynthesis precursors on the content of ascorbate in tomato.
|
| Feeding-leaf- total ascorbate content (μg g−1 FW) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| AC | 496.2 ± 6.3 | 422.5 ± 15.9 ** | 591.2 ± 7.6 ** | 215.6 ± 8.5 ** | 2139.9 ± 59.9 ** |
| 554.6 ± 14.2 | 452.4 ± 14.2 ** | 742.4 ± 10.5 ** | 162.5 ± 9.9 ** | 2733.7 ± 291.6 ** | |
| 579.8 ± 15.9 | 427.8 ± 3.2 ** | 623.8 ± 6.5 ** | 158.0 ± 9.8 ** | 2220.3 ± 71.9 ** | |
| 626.1 ± 10.2 | 508.1 ± 17.8 ** | 790.9 ± 6.4 ** | 283.1 ± 13.3 ** | 2584.4 ± 72.2 ** | |
|
| Feeding-fruit- total ascorbate content (μg g−1 FW) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| AC | 254.3 ± 3.6 | 276.1 ± 1.4 * | 287.9 ± 3.0 ** | 259.9 ± 5.2 | 296.3 ± 1.2 ** |
| 287.5 ± 4.0 | 384.6 ± 8.0 * | 396.2 ± 2.5 ** | 325.8 ± 4.9 ** | 368.4 ± 11.3 ** | |
| 251.0 ± 2.8 | 265.9 ± 4.7 * | 350.1 ± 6.9 ** | 261.9 ± 6.1 | 351.5 ± 34.8 ** | |
| 301.9 ± 8.3 | 373.7 ± 5.9 ** | 390.4 ± 7.4 ** | 331.5 ± 5.4 ** | 354.0 ± 7.0 ** | |
The leaves (upper panel) and fruits (lower panel) were fed with H2O, inositol (MI), glucose (GLc), galacturonic acid (GLA), and ascorbate (AsA) and incubated under light for 24 h. Three replicate experiments were performed. The data presented are means ± SE. FW—fresh weight. The asterisks represented significant differences from wild type (AC), as indicated by the t-test (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01).
Figure 2Dynamic change of ascorbate accumulation in response to light in leaves of AC and pyramiding lines. Plants were grown in the greenhouse, and fully expanded leaves were harvested every 4 h, total ascorbate content was measured for 48 h (8 dark/16 light). Three replicate experiments were performed. Error bars represent standard error, means ± SE. FW—fresh weight.
Figure 3Ascorbate concentration in leaf and fruit petioles and their exudates of wild-type and pyramiding tomato lines. (A) AsA levels in fruit petioles and leaf petioles of wild type and pyramiding lines. (B) AsA content in exudates of fruit and leaf petioles in AC and pyramiding lines. Three replicate experiments were performed. Error bars represent standard error, means ± SE. FW—fresh weight. The asterisks represented significant differences from wild-type (AC), as indicated by the t-test (** p < 0.01).
Figure 4Ascorbate content in fruits of AC and pyramiding lines after fruit petioles cultured in 5 mM AsA for 24 h. (A) AsA localization using AgNO3 in transverse sections of mature green fruit after fruit petioles were cultured in 5 mM AsA for 24 h. (B) AsA levels in the fruit of AC and pyramiding lines after fruit petioles were cultured in 5 mM AsA for 24 h. Three replicate experiments were performed. Error bars represent standard error, means ± SE. FW—fresh weight. The asterisks represented significant differences from control (H2O), as indicated by the t-test (** p < 0.01).
Figure 5The oxidative stress tolerance in AC and pyramiding tomato lines. (A,B) The chlorophyll (A) and malondialdehyde (MDA) content (B) in leaves treated with methyl viologen (MV) or water (CK) was measured on days 3 and 7 post-treatment, respectively. Three replicate experiments were performed. The data presented are means ± SE. The asterisks represent significant differences from the control (CK), as indicated by the t-test (** p < 0.01). (C) Detection of H2O2 accumulation in the leaves of AC and pyramiding lines by DAB staining in leaves from the two-month-old plants of AC and pyramiding lines. (D) H2DCFDA fluorescence (bar = 2000 μm) to reveal the accumulation of H2O2 in leaves from the two-month-old plants of AC and pyramiding lines. G × G × G × G means GMP × GME × GGP × GPP.
Figure 6The fruit weight (A), transverse diameter (B), longitudinal diameter (C), and brix degree (D) in AC and pyramiding lines. Three replicate experiments were performed. Error bars represent standard error, means ± SE. G × G × G × G means GMP × GME × GGP × GPP. The asterisks represented significant differences from wild type (AC), as indicated by the t-test (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01).