Robert L Barry1,2,3, Seth A Smith4,5,6. 1. Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts. 2. Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Harvard-Massachusetts Institute of Technology Health Sciences & Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 4. Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. 5. Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. 6. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To measure the transverse relaxation time T2* in healthy human cervical spinal cord gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) at 3T. METHODS: Thirty healthy volunteers were recruited. Axial images were acquired using an averaged multi-echo gradient-echo (mFFE) T2*-weighted sequence with 5 echoes. We used the signal equation for an mFFE sequence with constant dephasing gradients after each echo to jointly estimate the spin density and T2* for each voxel. RESULTS: No global difference in T2* was observed between all GM (41.3 ± 5.6 ms) and all WM (39.8 ± 5.4 ms). No significant differences were observed between left (43.2 ± 6.8 ms) and right (43.4 ± 5.5 ms) ventral GM, left (38.3 ± 6.1 ms) and right (38.6 ± 6.5 ms) dorsal GM, and left (39.4 ± 5.8 ms) and right (40.3 ± 5.8 ms) lateral WM. However, significant regional differences were observed between ventral (43.4 ± 5.7 ms) and dorsal (38.4 ± 6.0 ms) GM (p < 0.05), as well as between ventral (42.9 ± 6.5 ms) and dorsal (37.9 ± 6.2 ms) WM (p < 0.05). In analyses across slices, inferior T2* was longer than superior T2* in GM (44.7 ms vs. 40.1 ms; p < 0.01) and in WM (41.8 ms vs. 35.9 ms; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in T2* are observed between ventral and dorsal GM, ventral and dorsal WM, and superior and inferior GM and WM. There is no evidence for bilateral asymmetry in T2* in the healthy cord. These values of T2* in the spinal cord are notably lower than most reported values of T2* in the cortex.
PURPOSE: To measure the transverse relaxation time T2* in healthy human cervical spinal cord gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) at 3T. METHODS: Thirty healthy volunteers were recruited. Axial images were acquired using an averaged multi-echo gradient-echo (mFFE) T2*-weighted sequence with 5 echoes. We used the signal equation for an mFFE sequence with constant dephasing gradients after each echo to jointly estimate the spin density and T2* for each voxel. RESULTS: No global difference in T2* was observed between all GM (41.3 ± 5.6 ms) and all WM (39.8 ± 5.4 ms). No significant differences were observed between left (43.2 ± 6.8 ms) and right (43.4 ± 5.5 ms) ventral GM, left (38.3 ± 6.1 ms) and right (38.6 ± 6.5 ms) dorsal GM, and left (39.4 ± 5.8 ms) and right (40.3 ± 5.8 ms) lateral WM. However, significant regional differences were observed between ventral (43.4 ± 5.7 ms) and dorsal (38.4 ± 6.0 ms) GM (p < 0.05), as well as between ventral (42.9 ± 6.5 ms) and dorsal (37.9 ± 6.2 ms) WM (p < 0.05). In analyses across slices, inferior T2* was longer than superior T2* in GM (44.7 ms vs. 40.1 ms; p < 0.01) and in WM (41.8 ms vs. 35.9 ms; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in T2* are observed between ventral and dorsal GM, ventral and dorsal WM, and superior and inferior GM and WM. There is no evidence for bilateral asymmetry in T2* in the healthy cord. These values of T2* in the spinal cord are notably lower than most reported values of T2* in the cortex.
Authors: A R Martin; B De Leener; J Cohen-Adad; D W Cadotte; S Kalsi-Ryan; S F Lange; L Tetreault; A Nouri; A Crawley; D J Mikulis; H Ginsberg; M G Fehlings Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2017-04-20 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: A R Martin; B De Leener; J Cohen-Adad; D W Cadotte; S Kalsi-Ryan; S F Lange; L Tetreault; A Nouri; A Crawley; D J Mikulis; H Ginsberg; M G Fehlings Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2017-04-20 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Benjamin De Leener; Gabriel Mangeat; Sara Dupont; Allan R Martin; Virginie Callot; Nikola Stikov; Michael G Fehlings; Julien Cohen-Adad Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-01-27 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Arzu Ozturk; Nafi Aygun; Seth A Smith; Brian Caffo; Peter A Calabresi; Daniel S Reich Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2012-12-04 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Robert L Barry; Benjamin N Conrad; Satoshi Maki; Jennifer M Watchmaker; Lydia J McKeithan; Bailey A Box; Quinn R Weinberg; Seth A Smith; John C Gore Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-11-10 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Silvan Büeler; Marios C Yiannakas; Zdravko Damjanovski; Patrick Freund; Martina D Liechti; Gergely David Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-10-03 Impact factor: 4.996