Benjamin De Leener1, Gabriel Mangeat1, Sara Dupont1, Allan R Martin2, Virginie Callot3,4, Nikola Stikov1,5, Michael G Fehlings2, Julien Cohen-Adad1,6. 1. NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada. 2. Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 3. Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, CRMBM UMR 7339, Marseille, France. 4. AP-HM, Hopital de la Timone, Pôle d'imagerie médicale, CEMEREM, Marseille, France. 5. Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada. 6. Functional Neuroimaging Unit, CRIUGM, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To propose a robust and accurate method for straightening magnetic resonance (MR) images of the spinal cord, based on spinal cord segmentation, that preserves spinal cord topology and that works for any MRI contrast, in a context of spinal cord template-based analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The spinal cord curvature was computed using an iterative Non-Uniform Rational B-Spline (NURBS) approximation. Forward and inverse deformation fields for straightening were computed by solving analytically the straightening equations for each image voxel. Computational speed-up was accomplished by solving all voxel equation systems as one single system. Straightening accuracy (mean and maximum distance from straight line), computational time, and robustness to spinal cord length was evaluated using the proposed and the standard straightening method (label-based spline deformation) on 3T T2 - and T1 -weighted images from 57 healthy subjects and 33 patients with spinal cord compression due to degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). RESULTS: The proposed algorithm was more accurate, more robust, and faster than the standard method (mean distance = 0.80 vs. 0.83 mm, maximum distance = 1.49 vs. 1.78 mm, time = 71 vs. 174 sec for the healthy population and mean distance = 0.65 vs. 0.68 mm, maximum distance = 1.28 vs. 1.55 mm, time = 32 vs. 60 sec for the DCM population). CONCLUSION: A novel image straightening method that enables template-based analysis of quantitative spinal cord MRI data is introduced. This algorithm works for any MRI contrast and was validated on healthy and patient populations. The presented method is implemented in the Spinal Cord Toolbox, an open-source software for processing spinal cord MRI data. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;46:1209-1219.
PURPOSE: To propose a robust and accurate method for straightening magnetic resonance (MR) images of the spinal cord, based on spinal cord segmentation, that preserves spinal cord topology and that works for any MRI contrast, in a context of spinal cord template-based analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The spinal cord curvature was computed using an iterative Non-Uniform Rational B-Spline (NURBS) approximation. Forward and inverse deformation fields for straightening were computed by solving analytically the straightening equations for each image voxel. Computational speed-up was accomplished by solving all voxel equation systems as one single system. Straightening accuracy (mean and maximum distance from straight line), computational time, and robustness to spinal cord length was evaluated using the proposed and the standard straightening method (label-based spline deformation) on 3T T2 - and T1 -weighted images from 57 healthy subjects and 33 patients with spinal cord compression due to degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). RESULTS: The proposed algorithm was more accurate, more robust, and faster than the standard method (mean distance = 0.80 vs. 0.83 mm, maximum distance = 1.49 vs. 1.78 mm, time = 71 vs. 174 sec for the healthy population and mean distance = 0.65 vs. 0.68 mm, maximum distance = 1.28 vs. 1.55 mm, time = 32 vs. 60 sec for the DCM population). CONCLUSION: A novel image straightening method that enables template-based analysis of quantitative spinal cord MRI data is introduced. This algorithm works for any MRI contrast and was validated on healthy and patient populations. The presented method is implemented in the Spinal Cord Toolbox, an open-source software for processing spinal cord MRI data. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;46:1209-1219.
Authors: Donatienne Van Weehaeghe; Martijn Devrome; Michel Koole; Koen Van Laere; Georg Schramm; Joke De Vocht; Wies Deckers; Kristof Baete; Philip Van Damme Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-04-20 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Francisco Grandas; Manuel Desco; Francisco J Navas-Sánchez; Luis Marcos-Vidal; Daniel Martín de Blas; Alberto Fernández-Pena; Yasser Alemán-Gómez; Juan A Guzmán-de-Villoria; Julia Romero; Irene Catalina; Laura Lillo; José L Muñoz-Blanco; Andrés Ordoñez-Ugalde; Beatriz Quintáns; María-Jesús Sobrido; Susanna Carmona Journal: J Neurol Date: 2022-01-09 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Julien Cohen-Adad; Eva Alonso-Ortiz; Mihael Abramovic; Carina Arneitz; Nicole Atcheson; Laura Barlow; Robert L Barry; Markus Barth; Marco Battiston; Christian Büchel; Matthew Budde; Virginie Callot; Anna J E Combes; Benjamin De Leener; Maxime Descoteaux; Paulo Loureiro de Sousa; Marek Dostál; Julien Doyon; Adam Dvorak; Falk Eippert; Karla R Epperson; Kevin S Epperson; Patrick Freund; Jürgen Finsterbusch; Alexandru Foias; Michela Fratini; Issei Fukunaga; Claudia A M Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott; Giancarlo Germani; Guillaume Gilbert; Federico Giove; Charley Gros; Francesco Grussu; Akifumi Hagiwara; Pierre-Gilles Henry; Tomáš Horák; Masaaki Hori; James Joers; Kouhei Kamiya; Haleh Karbasforoushan; Miloš Keřkovský; Ali Khatibi; Joo-Won Kim; Nawal Kinany; Hagen Kitzler; Shannon Kolind; Yazhuo Kong; Petr Kudlička; Paul Kuntke; Nyoman D Kurniawan; Slawomir Kusmia; René Labounek; Maria Marcella Laganà; Cornelia Laule; Christine S Law; Christophe Lenglet; Tobias Leutritz; Yaou Liu; Sara Llufriu; Sean Mackey; Eloy Martinez-Heras; Loan Mattera; Igor Nestrasil; Kristin P O'Grady; Nico Papinutto; Daniel Papp; Deborah Pareto; Todd B Parrish; Anna Pichiecchio; Ferran Prados; Àlex Rovira; Marc J Ruitenberg; Rebecca S Samson; Giovanni Savini; Maryam Seif; Alan C Seifert; Alex K Smith; Seth A Smith; Zachary A Smith; Elisabeth Solana; Yuichi Suzuki; George Tackley; Alexandra Tinnermann; Jan Valošek; Dimitri Van De Ville; Marios C Yiannakas; Kenneth A Weber; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Richard G Wise; Patrik O Wyss; Junqian Xu Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2021-08-16 Impact factor: 17.021
Authors: Briana P Meyer; Lydiane Hirschler; Seongtaek Lee; Shekar N Kurpad; Jan M Warnking; Emmanuel L Barbier; Matthew D Budde Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2021-01-28 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Marco Battiston; Francesco Grussu; Andrada Ianus; Torben Schneider; Ferran Prados; James Fairney; Sebastien Ourselin; Daniel C Alexander; Mara Cercignani; Claudia A M Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott; Rebecca S Samson Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-09-16 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Roberta Maria Lorenzi; Fulvia Palesi; Gloria Castellazzi; Paolo Vitali; Nicoletta Anzalone; Sara Bernini; Matteo Cotta Ramusino; Elena Sinforiani; Giuseppe Micieli; Alfredo Costa; Egidio D'Angelo; Claudia A M Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott Journal: Front Cell Neurosci Date: 2020-01-30 Impact factor: 5.505
Authors: Richard L Shinn; Theresa E Pancotto; Krystina L Stadler; Stephen R Werre; John H Rossmeisl Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2020-10-02 Impact factor: 3.333