INTRODUCTION: In multiple sclerosis (MS), spinal cord imaging can help in diagnosis and follow-up evaluation. However, spinal cord magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is technically challenging, and image quality, particularly in the axial plane, is typically poor compared to brain MRI. Because gradient-recalled echo (GRE) images might offer improved contrast resolution within the spinal cord at high magnetic field strength, both without and with a magnetization transfer prepulse, we compared them to T2-weighted fast-spin-echo (T2-FSE) images for the detection of MS lesions in the cervical cord at 3T. METHODS: On a clinical 3T MRI scanner, we studied 62 MS cases and 19 healthy volunteers. Axial 3D GRE sequences were performed without and with off-resonance radiofrequency irradiation. To mimic clinical practice, all images were evaluated in conjunction with linked images from a sagittal short tau inversion recovery scan, which is considered the gold standard for lesion detection in MS. Two experienced observers recorded image quality, location and size of focal lesions, atrophy, swelling, and diffuse signal abnormality independently at first and then in consensus. RESULTS: The number and volume of lesions detected with high confidence was more than three times as high on both GRE sequences compared to T2-FSE (p < 0.0001). Approximately 5 % of GRE scans were affected by artifacts that interfered with image interpretation, not significantly different from T2W-FSE. CONCLUSIONS: Axial 3D GRE sequences are useful for MS lesion detection when compared to 2D T2-FSE sequences in the cervical spinal cord at 3T and should be considered when examining intramedullary spinal cord lesions.
INTRODUCTION: In multiple sclerosis (MS), spinal cord imaging can help in diagnosis and follow-up evaluation. However, spinal cord magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is technically challenging, and image quality, particularly in the axial plane, is typically poor compared to brain MRI. Because gradient-recalled echo (GRE) images might offer improved contrast resolution within the spinal cord at high magnetic field strength, both without and with a magnetization transfer prepulse, we compared them to T2-weighted fast-spin-echo (T2-FSE) images for the detection of MS lesions in the cervical cord at 3T. METHODS: On a clinical 3T MRI scanner, we studied 62 MS cases and 19 healthy volunteers. Axial 3D GRE sequences were performed without and with off-resonance radiofrequency irradiation. To mimic clinical practice, all images were evaluated in conjunction with linked images from a sagittal short tau inversion recovery scan, which is considered the gold standard for lesion detection in MS. Two experienced observers recorded image quality, location and size of focal lesions, atrophy, swelling, and diffuse signal abnormality independently at first and then in consensus. RESULTS: The number and volume of lesions detected with high confidence was more than three times as high on both GRE sequences compared to T2-FSE (p < 0.0001). Approximately 5 % of GRE scans were affected by artifacts that interfered with image interpretation, not significantly different from T2W-FSE. CONCLUSIONS: Axial 3D GRE sequences are useful for MS lesion detection when compared to 2D T2-FSE sequences in the cervical spinal cord at 3T and should be considered when examining intramedullary spinal cord lesions.
Authors: G J Nijeholt; E Bergers; W Kamphorst; J Bot; K Nicolay; J A Castelijns; J H van Waesberghe; R Ravid; C H Polman; F Barkhof Journal: Brain Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Joseph C J Bot; Erwin L A Blezer; Wouter Kamphorst; Geert J Lycklama A Nijeholt; Herman J Ader; Jonas A Castelijns; Klaas Nicolay Ig; Elisabeth Bergers; Rivka Ravid; Chris Polman; Frederik Barkhof Journal: Radiology Date: 2004-09-22 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: P A Brex; K A Miszkiel; J I O'Riordan; G T Plant; I F Moseley; A J Thompson; D H Miller Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Adrienne N Dula; Siddharama Pawate; Richard D Dortch; Robert L Barry; Kristen M George-Durrett; Bailey D Lyttle; Lindsey M Dethrage; John C Gore; Seth A Smith Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2015-07-24 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Andrew J Asman; Frederick W Bryan; Seth A Smith; Daniel S Reich; Bennett A Landman Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2014-02-05 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: I Riederer; D C Karampinos; M Settles; C Preibisch; J S Bauer; J F Kleine; M Mühlau; C Zimmer Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-08-28 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Mahdi Alizadeh; Pallav Shah; Chris J Conklin; Devon M Middleton; Sona Saksena; Adam E Flanders; Laura Krisa; M J Mulcahey; Scott H Faro; Feroze B Mohamed Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 4.056
Authors: Pascal Sati; Jiwon Oh; R Todd Constable; Nikos Evangelou; Charles R G Guttmann; Roland G Henry; Eric C Klawiter; Caterina Mainero; Luca Massacesi; Henry McFarland; Flavia Nelson; Daniel Ontaneda; Alexander Rauscher; William D Rooney; Amal P R Samaraweera; Russell T Shinohara; Raymond A Sobel; Andrew J Solomon; Constantina A Treaba; Jens Wuerfel; Robert Zivadinov; Nancy L Sicotte; Daniel Pelletier; Daniel S Reich Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2016-11-11 Impact factor: 42.937