Literature DB >> 30924182

Describing latent phase duration and associated characteristics among 1281 low-risk women in spontaneous labor.

Ellen L Tilden1,2, Julia C Phillippi3, Mia Ahlberg4, Tekoa L King5, Mekhala Dissanayake2, Christopher S Lee6, Jonathan M Snowden2,7, Aaron B Caughey1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent research suggests that latent phase of labor may terminate at 6 rather than 4 centimeters of cervical dilation. The objectives of this study were to: (a) characterize duration of the latent phase of labor among term, low-risk, United States women in spontaneous labor using the women's self-identified onset; and (b) quantify associations between demographic and maternal/newborn health characteristics and the duration of the latent phase.
METHODS: This prospective study (n = 1281) described the duration of the latent phase of labor in hours, stratified by parity at the mean, median, and 80th, 90th, and 95th percentiles. The duration of the latent phase was compared for each characteristic using t tests or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and regression models that controlled for confounders.
RESULTS: In this sample of predominantly white, healthy women, duration of the latent phase of labor was longer than described in previous studies: The median duration was 9.0 hours and mean duration was 11.8 hours in nulliparous women. The median duration was 6.8 hours and mean duration was 9.3 hours in multiparous women. Among nulliparous women, longer duration was seen in women whose fetus was in a malposition. Among multiparous women, longer durations were noted in women with chorioamnionitis and those who gave birth between 41 and 41 + 6 weeks' gestation (vs between 40 and 40 + 6 weeks' gestation).
CONCLUSIONS: The latent phase of labor may be longer than previously estimated. Contemporary estimates of latent phase of labor duration will help women and providers accurately anticipate, prepare, and cope during spontaneous labor.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chorioamnionitis; fetal malposition; labor; labor progress; latent phase of labor; postdates

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30924182      PMCID: PMC6765461          DOI: 10.1111/birt.12428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  42 in total

1.  Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; James F Troendle; Michael K Yancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Labor in multiparas; a graphicostatistical analysis.

Authors:  E A FRIEDMAN
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1956-12       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Epidural analgesia in British obstetrics.

Authors:  D D Moir; J Willocks
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1968-02       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Women's Descriptions of Labor Onset and Progression Before Hospital Admission.

Authors:  Joyce K Edmonds; Gabriella Zabbo
Journal:  Nurs Womens Health       Date:  2017 Aug - Sep

5.  Use of an Early Labor Lounge to Promote Admission in Active Labor.

Authors:  Julie A Paul; Susan M Yount; Rachel Blankstein Breman; Melissa LeClair; Diane M Keiran; Nannette Landry; Kimberly Dever
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 6.  Committee Opinion No. 687: Approaches to Limit Intervention During Labor and Birth.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 7.  Chorioamnionitis and labor.

Authors:  Rodney K Edwards
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  The natural history of the normal first stage of labor.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; James Troendle; Rafael Mikolajczyk; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Julie Beaver; William Fraser
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Latent phase of labor in normal patients: a reassessment.

Authors:  D B Peisner; M G Rosen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Does the way that women experience the onset of labour influence the duration of labour?

Authors:  Mechthild M Gross; Hartmut Hecker; Andrea Matterne; Hans Heinrich Guenter; Marc J N C Keirse
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.531

View more
  3 in total

1.  The association between longer durations of the latent phase of labor and subsequent perinatal processes and outcomes among midwifery patients.

Authors:  Ellen L Tilden; Julia C Phillippi; Nicole Carlson; Mekhala Dissanayake; Christopher S Lee; Aaron B Caughey; Jonathan M Snowden
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 3.689

2.  Induction of labor or expectant management? Birth outcomes for nulliparous individuals choosing midwifery care.

Authors:  Elise N Erickson; Joanne M Bailey; Shanti D Colo; Nicole S Carlson; Ellen L Tilden
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 3.081

3.  Induction of labor compared to expectant management in term nulliparas with a latent phase of labor of more than 8 hours: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Patrick Naveen Sargunam; Lindy Li Mei Bak; Peng Chiong Tan; Narayanan Vallikkannu; Mat Adenan Noor Azmi; Syeda Nureena Zaidi; Sandar Tin Win; Siti Zawiah Omar
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.007

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.