Literature DB >> 16487200

Does the way that women experience the onset of labour influence the duration of labour?

Mechthild M Gross1, Hartmut Hecker, Andrea Matterne, Hans Heinrich Guenter, Marc J N C Keirse.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the way in which women experience the onset of their labour influences the duration of their labour.
DESIGN: Longitudinal study on a convenient sample of women in spontaneous labour with a singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation at term.
SETTING: University hospital in Germany. POPULATION/SAMPLE: Six hundred and fifty-one women (347 primiparae and 304 parae).
METHODS: Women recorded how and when labour had started. Responses were subjected to structured content analysis. Two investigators independently subdivided women's reported signs and symptoms into eight predefined categories. These data were related to maternal characteristics and to the course and outcome of labour as documented in the perinatal record. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Women's perception of how labour had started, interval between onset of labour and rupture of the membranes and duration of first stage labour and overall duration of labour.
RESULTS: Only 60% of women reported contractions as a sign of the onset of their labour. These women had a longer interval between the onset of labour and rupture of the membranes but a similar duration of labour when compared with women who did not report contractions as a sign of the onset of labour. Self-reported loss of amniotic fluid was the only sign that showed a consistent relationship with the duration of labour. Other patterns of labour onset had no effect on the duration of labour.
CONCLUSION: Irrespective of whether they have given birth before, women experience their onset of labour in a variety of ways. A large proportion of these experiences bear no resemblance to the classical diagnosis of labour and most are unrelated to the duration of labour.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16487200     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00817.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  6 in total

Review 1.  Assessment and support during early labour for improving birth outcomes.

Authors:  Shinobu Kobayashi; Nobutsugu Hanada; Masayo Matsuzaki; Kenji Takehara; Erika Ota; Hatoko Sasaki; Chie Nagata; Rintaro Mori
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-20

2.  Describing latent phase duration and associated characteristics among 1281 low-risk women in spontaneous labor.

Authors:  Ellen L Tilden; Julia C Phillippi; Mia Ahlberg; Tekoa L King; Mekhala Dissanayake; Christopher S Lee; Jonathan M Snowden; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.689

3.  Depressive Symptoms and Resilience among Pregnant Adolescents: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Danny Salazar-Pousada; Dalton Arroyo; Luis Hidalgo; Faustino R Pérez-López; Peter Chedraui
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2011-02-21

4.  Effects of algorithm for diagnosis of active labour: cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  Helen Cheyne; Vanora Hundley; Dawn Dowding; J Martin Bland; Paul McNamee; Ian Greer; Maggie Styles; Carol A Barnett; Graham Scotland; Catherine Niven
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-12-08

Review 5.  Diagnosing onset of labor: a systematic review of definitions in the research literature.

Authors:  Gillian E Hanley; Sarah Munro; Devon Greyson; Mechthild M Gross; Vanora Hundley; Helen Spiby; Patricia A Janssen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Induction of labor compared to expectant management in term nulliparas with a latent phase of labor of more than 8 hours: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Patrick Naveen Sargunam; Lindy Li Mei Bak; Peng Chiong Tan; Narayanan Vallikkannu; Mat Adenan Noor Azmi; Syeda Nureena Zaidi; Sandar Tin Win; Siti Zawiah Omar
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.007

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.