Jun Zhang1, James F Troendle, Michael K Yancey. 1. Division of Epidemiology, Statistics, and Prevention Research, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development/NIH, Building 6100, Room 7B03, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. jim_zhang@nih.gov
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to examine the pattern of labor progression in nulliparous parturients in contemporary obstetric practice. STUDY DESIGN: We extracted detailed labor data from 1329 nulliparous parturients with a term, singleton, vertex fetus of normal birth weight after spontaneous onset of labor. Cesarean deliveries were excluded. We used a repeated-measures regression with a 10th-order polynomial function to discover the average labor curve under contemporary practice. With use of an interval-censored regression with a log normal distribution, we also computed the expected time interval of the cervix to reach the next centimeter, the expected rate of cervical dilation at each phase of labor, and the duration of labor for fetal descent at various stations. RESULTS: Our average labor curve differs markedly from the Friedman curve. The cervix dilated substantially slower in the active phase. It took approximately 5.5 hours from 4 cm to 10 cm, compared with 2.5 hours under the Friedman curve. We observed no deceleration phase. Before 7 cm, no perceivable change in cervical dilation for more than 2 hour was not uncommon. The 5th percentiles of rate of cervical dilation were all below 1 cm per hour. The 95th percentile of time interval for fetal descent from station +1/3 to +2/3 was 3 hours at the second stage. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the pattern of labor progression in contemporary practice differs significantly from the Friedman curve. The diagnostic criteria for protraction and arrest disorders of labor may be too stringent in nulliparous women.
OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to examine the pattern of labor progression in nulliparous parturients in contemporary obstetric practice. STUDY DESIGN: We extracted detailed labor data from 1329 nulliparous parturients with a term, singleton, vertex fetus of normal birth weight after spontaneous onset of labor. Cesarean deliveries were excluded. We used a repeated-measures regression with a 10th-order polynomial function to discover the average labor curve under contemporary practice. With use of an interval-censored regression with a log normal distribution, we also computed the expected time interval of the cervix to reach the next centimeter, the expected rate of cervical dilation at each phase of labor, and the duration of labor for fetal descent at various stations. RESULTS: Our average labor curve differs markedly from the Friedman curve. The cervix dilated substantially slower in the active phase. It took approximately 5.5 hours from 4 cm to 10 cm, compared with 2.5 hours under the Friedman curve. We observed no deceleration phase. Before 7 cm, no perceivable change in cervical dilation for more than 2 hour was not uncommon. The 5th percentiles of rate of cervical dilation were all below 1 cm per hour. The 95th percentile of time interval for fetal descent from station +1/3 to +2/3 was 3 hours at the second stage. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the pattern of labor progression in contemporary practice differs significantly from the Friedman curve. The diagnostic criteria for protraction and arrest disorders of labor may be too stringent in nulliparous women.
Authors: Jun Zhang; Helain J Landy; D Ware Branch; Ronald Burkman; Shoshana Haberman; Kimberly D Gregory; Christos G Hatjis; Mildred M Ramirez; Jennifer L Bailit; Victor H Gonzalez-Quintero; Judith U Hibbard; Matthew K Hoffman; Michelle Kominiarek; Lee A Learman; Paul Van Veldhuisen; James Troendle; Uma M Reddy Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Katherine L Grantz; Victor Gonzalez-Quintero; James Troendle; Uma M Reddy; Stefanie N Hinkle; Michelle A Kominiarek; Zhaohui Lu; Jun Zhang Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2015-04-30 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Ellen L Tilden; Julia C Phillippi; Mia Ahlberg; Tekoa L King; Mekhala Dissanayake; Christopher S Lee; Jonathan M Snowden; Aaron B Caughey Journal: Birth Date: 2019-03-28 Impact factor: 3.689
Authors: William A Grobman; Jennifer Bailit; Yinglei Lai; Uma M Reddy; Ronald J Wapner; Michael W Varner; John M Thorp; Kenneth J Leveno; Steve N Caritis; Mona Prasad; Alan T N Tita; George Saade; Yoram Sorokin; Dwight J Rouse; Sean C Blackwell; Jorge E Tolosa Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-11-11 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Helain J Landy; S Katherine Laughon; Jennifer L Bailit; Michelle A Kominiarek; Victor Hugo Gonzalez-Quintero; Mildred Ramirez; Shoshana Haberman; Judith Hibbard; Isabelle Wilkins; D Ware Branch; Ronald T Burkman; Kimberly Gregory; Matthew K Hoffman; Lee A Learman; Christos Hatjis; Paul C VanVeldhuisen; Uma M Reddy; James Troendle; Liping Sun; Jun Zhang Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Anna C McCormick; Jennifer J McIntosh; Weihua Gao; Judith U Hibbard; Meredith O Cruz Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2019-06-14 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Lorie M Harper; Aaron B Caughey; Kimberly A Roehl; Anthony O Odibo; Alison G Cahill Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2013-12-19 Impact factor: 8.661