Literature DB >> 12388957

Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women.

Jun Zhang1, James F Troendle, Michael K Yancey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to examine the pattern of labor progression in nulliparous parturients in contemporary obstetric practice. STUDY
DESIGN: We extracted detailed labor data from 1329 nulliparous parturients with a term, singleton, vertex fetus of normal birth weight after spontaneous onset of labor. Cesarean deliveries were excluded. We used a repeated-measures regression with a 10th-order polynomial function to discover the average labor curve under contemporary practice. With use of an interval-censored regression with a log normal distribution, we also computed the expected time interval of the cervix to reach the next centimeter, the expected rate of cervical dilation at each phase of labor, and the duration of labor for fetal descent at various stations.
RESULTS: Our average labor curve differs markedly from the Friedman curve. The cervix dilated substantially slower in the active phase. It took approximately 5.5 hours from 4 cm to 10 cm, compared with 2.5 hours under the Friedman curve. We observed no deceleration phase. Before 7 cm, no perceivable change in cervical dilation for more than 2 hour was not uncommon. The 5th percentiles of rate of cervical dilation were all below 1 cm per hour. The 95th percentile of time interval for fetal descent from station +1/3 to +2/3 was 3 hours at the second stage.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the pattern of labor progression in contemporary practice differs significantly from the Friedman curve. The diagnostic criteria for protraction and arrest disorders of labor may be too stringent in nulliparous women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12388957     DOI: 10.1067/mob.2002.127142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  50 in total

1.  Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Helain J Landy; D Ware Branch; Ronald Burkman; Shoshana Haberman; Kimberly D Gregory; Christos G Hatjis; Mildred M Ramirez; Jennifer L Bailit; Victor H Gonzalez-Quintero; Judith U Hibbard; Matthew K Hoffman; Michelle Kominiarek; Lee A Learman; Paul Van Veldhuisen; James Troendle; Uma M Reddy
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Labor patterns in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean with normal neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Katherine L Grantz; Victor Gonzalez-Quintero; James Troendle; Uma M Reddy; Stefanie N Hinkle; Michelle A Kominiarek; Zhaohui Lu; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Describing latent phase duration and associated characteristics among 1281 low-risk women in spontaneous labor.

Authors:  Ellen L Tilden; Julia C Phillippi; Mia Ahlberg; Tekoa L King; Mekhala Dissanayake; Christopher S Lee; Jonathan M Snowden; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.689

Review 4.  What is the slowest-yet-normal cervical dilation rate among nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset?

Authors:  Jeremy L Neal; Nancy K Lowe; Thelma E Patrick; Lori A Cabbage; Elizabeth J Corwin
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug

5.  Defining failed induction of labor.

Authors:  William A Grobman; Jennifer Bailit; Yinglei Lai; Uma M Reddy; Ronald J Wapner; Michael W Varner; John M Thorp; Kenneth J Leveno; Steve N Caritis; Mona Prasad; Alan T N Tita; George Saade; Yoram Sorokin; Dwight J Rouse; Sean C Blackwell; Jorge E Tolosa
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Estimating time to event characteristics via longitudinal threshold regression models - an application to cervical dilation progression.

Authors:  Caroline M Mulatya; Alexander C McLain; Bo Cai; James W Hardin; Paul S Albert
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Characteristics associated with severe perineal and cervical lacerations during vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Helain J Landy; S Katherine Laughon; Jennifer L Bailit; Michelle A Kominiarek; Victor Hugo Gonzalez-Quintero; Mildred Ramirez; Shoshana Haberman; Judith Hibbard; Isabelle Wilkins; D Ware Branch; Ronald T Burkman; Kimberly Gregory; Matthew K Hoffman; Lee A Learman; Christos Hatjis; Paul C VanVeldhuisen; Uma M Reddy; James Troendle; Liping Sun; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  The Impact of Fetal Anomalies on Contemporary Labor Patterns.

Authors:  Anna C McCormick; Jennifer J McIntosh; Weihua Gao; Judith U Hibbard; Meredith O Cruz
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Influence of Maternal Obesity on Labor Induction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jessica A Ellis; Carolyn M Brown; Brian Barger; Nicole S Carlson
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 2.388

10.  Defining an abnormal first stage of labor based on maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Lorie M Harper; Aaron B Caughey; Kimberly A Roehl; Anthony O Odibo; Alison G Cahill
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.