Literature DB >> 4058822

Latent phase of labor in normal patients: a reassessment.

D B Peisner, M G Rosen.   

Abstract

The vaginal examination data (dilation, station, and time) were examined from 2845 consecutive uncomplicated patients who were admitted in early labor to Cleveland Metropolitan General Hospital between January 1, 1979 and December 31, 1982, using data from the computer database of the Perinatal Clinical Research Center. The length of the latent phase of labor was calculated in 2479 of these patients to form the study group. Individual effects of parity and the cervical dilation on the length of the latent phase of labor resembled Friedman's results from 20 years ago. Furthermore, the average and prolonged lengths of the latent phase confirmed that labors have not changed appreciably in 20 years. However, multivariable analysis and standard stepwise regression on all of the vaginal examination data revealed that the largest influence on the length of latent labor was the admitting cervical dilation. Parity had only a small effect when cervical dilation was controlled. Thus, a multiparous patient may progress as slowly as a primiparous patient if they both are admitted with a low cervical dilation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4058822

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  5 in total

1.  Describing latent phase duration and associated characteristics among 1281 low-risk women in spontaneous labor.

Authors:  Ellen L Tilden; Julia C Phillippi; Mia Ahlberg; Tekoa L King; Mekhala Dissanayake; Christopher S Lee; Jonathan M Snowden; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.689

Review 2.  The management of term labour.

Authors:  J A Spencer
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  The association between longer durations of the latent phase of labor and subsequent perinatal processes and outcomes among midwifery patients.

Authors:  Ellen L Tilden; Julia C Phillippi; Nicole Carlson; Mekhala Dissanayake; Christopher S Lee; Aaron B Caughey; Jonathan M Snowden
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 3.689

Review 4.  Diagnosing onset of labor: a systematic review of definitions in the research literature.

Authors:  Gillian E Hanley; Sarah Munro; Devon Greyson; Mechthild M Gross; Vanora Hundley; Helen Spiby; Patricia A Janssen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 5.  Duration of spontaneous labour in 'low-risk' women with 'normal' perinatal outcomes: A systematic review.

Authors:  Edgardo Abalos; Olufemi T Oladapo; Mónica Chamillard; Virginia Díaz; Julia Pasquale; Mercedes Bonet; Joao Paulo Souza; A Metin Gülmezoglu
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.435

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.