| Literature DB >> 30922319 |
Yun Liu1, Martha Téllez-Rojo2, Howard Hu3, Brisa N Sánchez4, E Angeles Martinez-Mier5, Niladri Basu6, Adriana Mercado-García7, Maritsa Solano-González7, Karen E Peterson1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous animal and ecological studies have provided evidence for an earlier sexual maturation in females in relation to fluoride exposure; however, no epidemiological studies have examined the association between fluoride exposure and pubertal development in both boys and girls using individual-level biomarkers of fluoride. Capitalizing on an ongoing Mexican birth cohort study, we examined the association between concurrent urinary fluoride levels and physical markers of pubertal development in children.Entities:
Keywords: Fluoride; Genitalia; Menarche; Puberty; Pubic hair
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30922319 PMCID: PMC6439980 DOI: 10.1186/s12940-019-0465-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health ISSN: 1476-069X Impact factor: 5.984
Characteristics of included and excluded participants
| Included (total | Excluded (total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Mean (SD) or % | N | Mean (SD) or % | ||
| Demographics | |||||
| Child’s age (years) | 333 | 13.9 (2.1) | 217 | 15.5 (1.8) | < 0.0001 |
| Sex (male) | 157 | 47.2% | 108 | 49.8% | 0.55 |
| BMI-for-age z-score | 333 | 0.5 (1.4) | 212 | 0.5 (1.0) | 0.79 |
| Number of siblings at birth | 333 | 2.0 (1.0) | 212 | 2.0 (1.0) | 0.34 |
| Maternal education (years) | 333 | 11.1 (3.0) | 212 | 10.6 (2.8) | 0.05 |
| Marital status | |||||
| Married | 245 | 73.6% | 142 | 67.6% | 0.14 |
| Not married | 88 | 26.4% | 68 | 32.4% | |
Distribution of key covariates among 157 boys and 176 girls
| Variables | Min | 10% | 25% | 50% | 75% | 90% | Max | p-valuea | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Child’s age (years) | Boys | 10.7 | 11.5 | 12.2 | 13.4 | 15.8 | 17.2 | 17.7 | 0.70 |
| Girls | 10.8 | 11.4 | 12.0 | 13.5 | 15.8 | 16.8 | 17.8 | ||
| BMI-for-age z-score | Boys | −3.8 | −1.6 | −0.6 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 2.3 | 3.5 | 0.22 |
| Girls | −2.9 | −0.9 | −0.3 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 3.3 | ||
| Maternal education (years) | Boys | 6.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 12.0 | 12.0 | 16.0 | 20.0 | 0.43 |
| Girls | 2.0 | 7.0 | 9.0 | 11.0 | 12.0 | 16.0 | 21.0 | ||
| Number of siblings at birth | Boys | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 0.49 |
| Girls | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 | ||
| Urinary fluoride (mg/L)b | Boys | 0.15 | 0.38 | 0.48 | 0.63 | 0.77 | 0.97 | 3.01 | 0.64 |
| Girls | 0.05 | 0.34 | 0.43 | 0.57 | 0.75 | 1.09 | 2.61 | ||
| Boys | Girls | 0.39 | |||||||
| Marital status | N | % | N | % | |||||
| Married | 119 | 75.8% | 126 | 71.6% | |||||
| Not married | 38 | 24.2% | 50 | 28.4% |
aAnalysis of differences in key covariates by child sex bSpecific gravity-adjusted childhood urinary fluoride
Urinary fluoride levels (mg/L) according to key covariates by sexa
| Variable | N | Geometric mean (95% CI) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boys | ||||
| Age (years) | ≥12 | 123 | 0.61 (0.57, 0.66) | 0.35 |
| < 12 | 34 | 0.58 (0.53, 0.65) | ||
| Number of siblings at birth | < 2 | 55 | 0.58 (0.53, 0.64) | 0.42 |
| ≥2 | 102 | 0.62 (0.57, 0.67) | ||
| Maternal Education (years) | < 12 | 76 | 0.59 (0.54, 0.65) | 0.22 |
| 12 | 56 | 0.65 (0.57, 0.73) | ||
| > 12 | 25 | 0.56 (0.48, 0.64) | ||
| Marital status | Married | 119 | 0.62 (0.57, 0.67) | 0.10 |
| Other | 38 | 0.56 (0.50, 0.62) | ||
| Girls | ||||
| Age (years) | ≥12 | 127 | 0.59 (0.53, 0.64) | 0.55 |
| < 12 | 49 | 0.55 (0.49, 0.61) | ||
| Number of siblings at birth | < 2 | 69 | 0.57 (0.52, 0.63) | 0.84 |
| ≥2 | 107 | 0.57 (0.52, 0.63) | ||
| Maternal Education (years) | < 12 | 90 | 0.57 (0.51, 0.63) | 0.08 |
| 12 | 56 | 0.63 (0.55, 0.71) | ||
| > 12 | 30 | 0.51 (0.46, 0.56) | ||
| Marital status | Married | 126 | 0.57 (0.52, 0.62) | 0.68 |
| Other | 50 | 0.58 (0.51, 0.67) | ||
CI confidence interval
aSpecific gravity-adjusted childhood urinary fluoride
Distribution of physician-assessed secondary sex characteristicsa
| Measure | Stage | N (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Boys | ||
| Pubic hair | 1 | 42 (26.8) |
| 2 | 23 (14.7) | |
| 3 | 41 (26.1) | |
| 4 | 22 (14.0) | |
| 5 | 29 (18.5) | |
| Genitalia | 1 | 9 (5.7) |
| 2 | 30 (19.1) | |
| 3 | 32 (20.4) | |
| 4 | 57 (36.3) | |
| 5 | 29 (18.5) | |
| Testicular volume | Yes (> = 20 ml) | 101 (64.3) |
| No | 56 (35.7) | |
| Girls | ||
| Pubic hair | 1 | 16 (9.4) |
| 2 | 53 (31.0) | |
| 3 | 44 (22.5) | |
| 4 | 37 (21.6) | |
| 5 | 21 (12.3) | |
| Breast | 1 | 10 (5.9) |
| 2 | 26 (15.2) | |
| 3 | 49 (28.7) | |
| 4 | 59 (34.5) | |
| 5 | 27 (15.8) | |
| Menarche | Yes | 137 (78.3) |
| No | 38 (21.7) | |
aThe sample size is 157 for each indicator of puberty in boys. For girls, 171 of 176 girls had available data on pubic hair and breast development, and 175 girls had data on menarche
Adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of physician-assessed pubertal development per IQR (0.31 mg/L) increase in urinary fluoride concentrations in childrena
| Specific-gravity adjusted childhood urinary fluoride | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| N | OR (95% CI) | p-value | |
| Boys | |||
| Pubic hair | 157 | 0.71 (0.51, 0.98) | 0.03 |
| Genitalia | 157 | 0.71 (0.53, 0.95) | 0.02 |
| Testicular volume | 157 | 0.90 (0.65, 1.27) | 0.56 |
| Girls | |||
| Pubic hair | 171 | 0.86 (0.65, 1.14) | 0.29 |
| Breast | 171 | 0.85 (0.63, 1.14) | 0.30 |
OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval
aFor pubic hair, genitalia and breast, all estimates are from ordinal regression models. For testicular volume, all estimates are from logistic regression models. All models adjusted for child age and BMI z-score, number of siblings at birth, maternal education and marital status
Adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of self-reported menarche according to urinary fluoride in girlsa
| Specific-gravity adjusted childhood urinary fluoride | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| N | HR (95% CI) | p-value | |
| Menarche | |||
| Continuous fluoride (mg/L) | 175 | 0.82 (0.51, 1.33) | 0.42 |
| 1st tertile (< 0.48) | 68 | Reference | – |
| 2nd tertile (0.49–0.69) | 53 | 0.98 (0.64, 1.51) | 0.94 |
| 3rd tertile (0.70–2.61) | 55 | 0.76 (0.50, 1.17) | 0.21 |
HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval
aAll estimates are from Cox proportional-hazard models adjusted for maternal education and marital status, child BMI z-score and number of siblings at birth