C Koprowski1, R J Coates, L Bernstein. 1. Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA. carol.koprowski@csun.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The ability of young women (n = 132, average age 17 years) to recall body size and age at menarche was examined. The use of body silhouettes to assist women in recalling their body size at menarche and to represent their current body size was also evaluated. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Subjects, who previously participated in a cohort study, were asked to recall height and weight at the time of menarche, to select body silhouettes that best reflected their body shape at the time of menarche and their current body shape, and to recall age at menarche. Two sets of body silhouettes were developed, one representative of an adult body shape and another representative of an adolescent body shape. RESULTS: Pearson correlation coefficients between the adult and adolescent body figures and actual body mass index (BMI; kg/m(2)) at the time of menarche were not significantly different (r = 0.82 for adult figures vs. r = 0.72 for adolescent figures, p > 0.05). The correlation between actual BMI at the time of menarche and body silhouette (r = 0.77, all subjects) was similar to the correlation between actual and recalled BMI at the time of menarche (r = 0.83) as well as the correlation between current BMI and current body silhouette (r = 0.75). Recalled and actual ages at menarche were highly correlated (r = 0.83). DISCUSSION: The recall of body shape was considered to be a less precise measure of body size than asking about height and weight, but use of body silhouettes may offer advantages in certain situations.
OBJECTIVE: The ability of young women (n = 132, average age 17 years) to recall body size and age at menarche was examined. The use of body silhouettes to assist women in recalling their body size at menarche and to represent their current body size was also evaluated. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Subjects, who previously participated in a cohort study, were asked to recall height and weight at the time of menarche, to select body silhouettes that best reflected their body shape at the time of menarche and their current body shape, and to recall age at menarche. Two sets of body silhouettes were developed, one representative of an adult body shape and another representative of an adolescent body shape. RESULTS: Pearson correlation coefficients between the adult and adolescent body figures and actual body mass index (BMI; kg/m(2)) at the time of menarche were not significantly different (r = 0.82 for adult figures vs. r = 0.72 for adolescent figures, p > 0.05). The correlation between actual BMI at the time of menarche and body silhouette (r = 0.77, all subjects) was similar to the correlation between actual and recalled BMI at the time of menarche (r = 0.83) as well as the correlation between current BMI and current body silhouette (r = 0.75). Recalled and actual ages at menarche were highly correlated (r = 0.83). DISCUSSION: The recall of body shape was considered to be a less precise measure of body size than asking about height and weight, but use of body silhouettes may offer advantages in certain situations.
Authors: Paula Berstad; Ralph J Coates; Leslie Bernstein; Suzanne G Folger; Kathleen E Malone; Polly A Marchbanks; Linda K Weiss; Jonathan M Liff; Jill A McDonald; Brian L Strom; Michael S Simon; Dennis Deapen; Michael F Press; Ronald T Burkman; Robert Spirtas; Giske Ursin Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-05-25 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Allison F Vitonis; Heather J Baer; Susan E Hankinson; Marc R Laufer; Stacey A Missmer Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2010-02-19 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Lusine Yaghjyan; Graham A Colditz; Bernard Rosner; Kimberly A Bertrand; Rulla M Tamimi Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2016-06-28 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Maria E Bleil; Bradley M Appelhans; Melissa D Latham; Michelle A Irving; Steven E Gregorich; Nancy E Adler; Marcelle I Cedars Journal: Nurs Res Date: 2015 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.381
Authors: Ellen W Demerath; Ching-Ti Liu; Nora Franceschini; Gary Chen; Julie R Palmer; Erin N Smith; Christina T L Chen; Christine B Ambrosone; Alice M Arnold; Elisa V Bandera; Gerald S Berenson; Leslie Bernstein; Angela Britton; Anne R Cappola; Christopher S Carlson; Stephen J Chanock; Wei Chen; Zhao Chen; Sandra L Deming; Cathy E Elks; Michelle K Evans; Zofia Gajdos; Brian E Henderson; Jennifer J Hu; Sue Ingles; Esther M John; Kathleen F Kerr; Laurence N Kolonel; Loic Le Marchand; Xiaoning Lu; Robert C Millikan; Solomon K Musani; Nora L Nock; Kari North; Sarah Nyante; Michael F Press; Jorge L Rodriquez-Gil; Edward A Ruiz-Narvaez; Nicholas J Schork; Sathanur R Srinivasan; Nancy F Woods; Wei Zheng; Regina G Ziegler; Alan Zonderman; Gerardo Heiss; B Gwen Windham; Melissa Wellons; Sarah S Murray; Michael Nalls; Tomi Pastinen; Aleksandar Rajkovic; Joel Hirschhorn; L Adrienne Cupples; Charles Kooperberg; Joanne M Murabito; Christopher A Haiman Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2013-04-17 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Maria E Bleil; Nancy E Adler; Bradley M Appelhans; Steven E Gregorich; Barbara Sternfeld; Marcelle I Cedars Journal: Biol Psychol Date: 2013-02-18 Impact factor: 3.251
Authors: Jee H Rah; Abu Ahmed Shamim; Ummeh T Arju; Alain B Labrique; Mahbubur Rashid; Parul Christian Journal: J Health Popul Nutr Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 2.000