Amanda M Barberio1,2, Carlos Quiñonez3, F Shaun Hosein4, Lindsay McLaren5. 1. Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada. 2. Department of Community Health Sciences and O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, TRW3, 3280 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada. 3. Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 4. Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia. 5. Department of Community Health Sciences and O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, TRW3, 3280 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada. lmclaren@ucalgary.ca.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Recent studies have connected increased fluoride exposure with increased risk of neurodevelopmental-related outcomes, such as ADHD (attention deficit hyperactivity disorder) and lower IQ in children. Our primary objective was to examine the association between fluoride exposure and reported diagnosis of a learning disability among a population-based sample of Canadian children aged 3-12 years. METHODS: We analyzed data from Cycles 2 and 3 of the Canadian Health Measures Survey. Four measures of fluoride exposure were available: 1) urinary fluoride (μmol/L), 2) creatinine-adjusted urinary fluoride (μmol/mmol), 3) specific gravity-adjusted urinary fluoride (μmol/L), and 4) fluoride concentration of tap water (mg/L) (Cycle 3 only). Diagnosis of a learning disability (yes/no) was based on parental- or self-report. Associations were examined using logistic regression (where possible), unadjusted and adjusted for covariates. RESULTS: When Cycles 2 and 3 were examined separately, reported learning disability diagnosis was not significantly associated with any measure of fluoride exposure in unadjusted or adjusted models. When Cycles 2 and 3 were combined, a small but statistically significant effect was observed such that children with higher urinary fluoride had higher odds of having a reported learning disability in the adjusted model (p = 0.03). However, the association was not observed in models that used creatinine-adjusted urinary fluoride and specific gravity-adjusted urinary fluoride, which are believed to be more accurate measures due to their correction for urinary dilution. CONCLUSION: Overall, there did not appear to be a robust association between fluoride exposure and parental- or self-reported diagnosis of a learning disability among Canadian children.
OBJECTIVES: Recent studies have connected increased fluoride exposure with increased risk of neurodevelopmental-related outcomes, such as ADHD (attention deficit hyperactivity disorder) and lower IQ in children. Our primary objective was to examine the association between fluoride exposure and reported diagnosis of a learning disability among a population-based sample of Canadian children aged 3-12 years. METHODS: We analyzed data from Cycles 2 and 3 of the Canadian Health Measures Survey. Four measures of fluoride exposure were available: 1) urinary fluoride (μmol/L), 2) creatinine-adjusted urinary fluoride (μmol/mmol), 3) specific gravity-adjusted urinary fluoride (μmol/L), and 4) fluoride concentration of tapwater (mg/L) (Cycle 3 only). Diagnosis of a learning disability (yes/no) was based on parental- or self-report. Associations were examined using logistic regression (where possible), unadjusted and adjusted for covariates. RESULTS: When Cycles 2 and 3 were examined separately, reported learning disability diagnosis was not significantly associated with any measure of fluoride exposure in unadjusted or adjusted models. When Cycles 2 and 3 were combined, a small but statistically significant effect was observed such that children with higher urinary fluoride had higher odds of having a reported learning disability in the adjusted model (p = 0.03). However, the association was not observed in models that used creatinine-adjusted urinary fluoride and specific gravity-adjusted urinary fluoride, which are believed to be more accurate measures due to their correction for urinary dilution. CONCLUSION: Overall, there did not appear to be a robust association between fluoride exposure and parental- or self-reported diagnosis of a learning disability among Canadian children.
Authors: Anna L Choi; Ying Zhang; Guifan Sun; David C Bellinger; Kanglin Wang; Xiao Jing Yang; Jin Shu Li; Quanmei Zheng; Yuanli Fu; Philippe Grandjean Journal: Neurotoxicol Teratol Date: 2014-11-08 Impact factor: 3.763
Authors: Zipporah Iheozor-Ejiofor; Helen V Worthington; Tanya Walsh; Lucy O'Malley; Jan E Clarkson; Richard Macey; Rahul Alam; Peter Tugwell; Vivian Welch; Anne-Marie Glenny Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2015-06-18
Authors: Jonathan M Broadbent; W Murray Thomson; Sandhya Ramrakha; Terrie E Moffitt; Jiaxu Zeng; Lyndie A Foster Page; Richie Poulton Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Yun Liu; Martha Téllez-Rojo; Howard Hu; Brisa N Sánchez; E Angeles Martinez-Mier; Niladri Basu; Adriana Mercado-García; Maritsa Solano-González; Karen E Peterson Journal: Environ Health Date: 2019-03-29 Impact factor: 5.984
Authors: Rivka Green; Christine Till; Alejandra Cantoral; Bruce Lanphear; E Angeles Martinez-Mier; Pierre Ayotte; Robert O Wright; Martha M Tellez-Rojo; Ashley J Malin Journal: Toxics Date: 2020-11-20
Authors: Jacqueline M Burgette; Zelda T Dahl; Janice S Yi; Robert J Weyant; Daniel W McNeil; Betsy Foxman; Mary L Marazita Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-04-01