Literature DB >> 30921682

Self-reported inner speech relates to phonological retrieval ability in people with aphasia.

Mackenzie E Fama1, Mary P Henderson2, Sarah F Snider3, William Hayward4, Rhonda B Friedman3, Peter E Turkeltaub5.   

Abstract

Many individuals with aphasia report the ability to say words in their heads despite spoken naming difficulty. Here, we examined individual differences in the experience of inner speech (IS) in participants with aphasia to test the hypotheses that self-reported IS reflects intact phonological retrieval and that articulatory output processing is not essential to IS. Participants (N = 53) reported their ability to name items correctly internally during a silent picture-naming task. We compared this measure of self-reported IS to spoken picture naming and a battery of tasks measuring the underlying processes required for naming (i.e., phonological retrieval and output processing). Results from three separate analyses of these measures indicate that self-reported IS relates to phonological retrieval and that speech output processes are not a necessary component of IS. We suggest that self-reported IS may be a clinically valuable measure that could assist in clinical decision-making regarding anomia diagnosis and treatment.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anomia; Aphasia; Articulatory processing; Inner speech; Word retrieval

Year:  2019        PMID: 30921682      PMCID: PMC6544392          DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conscious Cogn        ISSN: 1053-8100


  33 in total

1.  Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production.

Authors:  B Rapp; M Goldrick
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Spoken word production: a theory of lexical access.

Authors:  W J Levelt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect.

Authors:  Gary M Oppenheim; Gary S Dell
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-04-02

4.  The lack of cerebral effects of d-tubocurarine.

Authors:  S M SMITH; H O BROWN
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1947-01       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  The effect of imagination on stimulation: the functional specificity of efference copies in speech processing.

Authors:  Xing Tian; David Poeppel
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  The effects of anodal stimulation of the left prefrontal cortex on sentence production.

Authors:  Nazbanou Nozari; Jennifer E Arnold; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  Monitoring and self-repair in speech.

Authors:  W J Levelt
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1983-07

8.  Toward a quantitative basis for assessment and diagnosis of apraxia of speech.

Authors:  Katarina L Haley; Adam Jacks; Michael de Riesthal; Rima Abou-Khalil; Heidi L Roth
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Auditory Masking Effects on Speech Fluency in Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia: Comparison to Altered Auditory Feedback.

Authors:  Adam Jacks; Katarina L Haley
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Inner Speech's Relationship With Overt Speech in Poststroke Aphasia.

Authors:  Brielle C Stark; Sharon Geva; Elizabeth A Warburton
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Inner Speech in Aphasia: Current Evidence, Clinical Implications, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Mackenzie E Fama; Peter E Turkeltaub
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  Intellectual awareness of naming abilities in people with chronic post-stroke aphasia.

Authors:  Candace M van der Stelt; Mackenzie E Fama; Joshua D Mccall; Sarah F Snider; Peter E Turkeltaub
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.054

3.  Two types of phonological reading impairment in stroke aphasia.

Authors:  Jonathan Vivian Dickens; Andrew T DeMarco; Candace M van der Stelt; Sarah F Snider; Elizabeth H Lacey; John D Medaglia; Rhonda B Friedman; Peter E Turkeltaub
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2021-08-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.