| Literature DB >> 30921682 |
Mackenzie E Fama1, Mary P Henderson2, Sarah F Snider3, William Hayward4, Rhonda B Friedman3, Peter E Turkeltaub5.
Abstract
Many individuals with aphasia report the ability to say words in their heads despite spoken naming difficulty. Here, we examined individual differences in the experience of inner speech (IS) in participants with aphasia to test the hypotheses that self-reported IS reflects intact phonological retrieval and that articulatory output processing is not essential to IS. Participants (N = 53) reported their ability to name items correctly internally during a silent picture-naming task. We compared this measure of self-reported IS to spoken picture naming and a battery of tasks measuring the underlying processes required for naming (i.e., phonological retrieval and output processing). Results from three separate analyses of these measures indicate that self-reported IS relates to phonological retrieval and that speech output processes are not a necessary component of IS. We suggest that self-reported IS may be a clinically valuable measure that could assist in clinical decision-making regarding anomia diagnosis and treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Anomia; Aphasia; Articulatory processing; Inner speech; Word retrieval
Year: 2019 PMID: 30921682 PMCID: PMC6544392 DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.03.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Conscious Cogn ISSN: 1053-8100