Literature DB >> 31518502

Inner Speech in Aphasia: Current Evidence, Clinical Implications, and Future Directions.

Mackenzie E Fama1,2, Peter E Turkeltaub2,3.   

Abstract

Purpose Typical language users can engage in a lively internal monologue for introspection and task performance, but what is the nature of inner speech among individuals with aphasia? Studying the phenomenon of inner speech in this population has the potential to further our understanding of inner speech more generally, help clarify the subjective experience of those with aphasia, and inform clinical practice. In this scoping review, we describe and synthesize the existing literature on inner speech in aphasia. Method Studies examining inner speech in aphasia were located through electronic databases and citation searches. Across the various studies, methods include both subjective approaches (i.e., asking individuals with aphasia about the integrity of their inner speech) and objective approaches (i.e., administering objective language tests as proxy measures for inner speech ability). The findings of relevant studies are summarized. Results Although definitions of inner speech vary across research groups, studies using both subjective and objective methods have established findings showing that inner speech can be preserved relative to spoken language in individuals with aphasia, particularly among those with relatively intact word retrieval and difficulty primarily at the level of speech output processing. Approaches that combine self-report with objective measures have demonstrated that individuals with aphasia are, on the whole, reliably able to report the integrity of their inner speech. Conclusions The examination of inner speech in individuals with aphasia has potential implications for clinical practice, in that differences in the preservation of inner speech across individuals may help guide clinical decision making around aphasia treatment. Although there are many questions that remain open to further investigation, studying inner speech in this specific population has also contributed to a broader understanding of the mechanisms of inner speech more generally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31518502      PMCID: PMC7233112          DOI: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-CAC48-18-0212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol        ISSN: 1058-0360            Impact factor:   2.408


  53 in total

1.  Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect.

Authors:  Gary M Oppenheim; Gary S Dell
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-04-02

2.  Is comprehension necessary for error detection? A conflict-based account of monitoring in speech production.

Authors:  Nazbanou Nozari; Gary S Dell; Myrna F Schwartz
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Monitoring and self-repair in speech.

Authors:  W J Levelt
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1983-07

4.  Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers.

Authors:  G S Dell; M F Schwartz; N Martin; E M Saffran; D A Gagnon
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 (SAQOL-39): evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity.

Authors:  Katerina Hilari; Sally Byng; Donna L Lamping; Sarah C Smith
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2003-07-10       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 6.  Bridging computational approaches to speech production: The semantic-lexical-auditory-motor model (SLAM).

Authors:  Grant M Walker; Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

7.  The neural correlates of inner speech defined by voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping.

Authors:  Sharon Geva; P Simon Jones; Jenny T Crinion; Cathy J Price; Jean-Claude Baron; Elizabeth A Warburton
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 8.  A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency.

Authors:  Mai T Pham; Andrijana Rajić; Judy D Greig; Jan M Sargeant; Andrew Papadopoulos; Scott A McEwen
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 5.273

9.  Mental imagery of speech: linking motor and perceptual systems through internal simulation and estimation.

Authors:  Xing Tian; David Poeppel
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Exploring the Ecological Validity of Thinking on Demand: Neural Correlates of Elicited vs. Spontaneously Occurring Inner Speech.

Authors:  Russell T Hurlburt; Ben Alderson-Day; Simone Kühn; Charles Fernyhough
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Distinguishing semantic control and phonological control and their role in aphasic deficits: A task switching investigation.

Authors:  Joshua McCall; Candace M van der Stelt; Andrew DeMarco; J Vivian Dickens; Elizabeth Dvorak; Elizabeth Lacey; Sarah Snider; Rhonda Friedman; Peter Turkeltaub
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.054

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.