Literature DB >> 28885640

Inner Speech's Relationship With Overt Speech in Poststroke Aphasia.

Brielle C Stark1, Sharon Geva2, Elizabeth A Warburton1.   

Abstract

Purpose: Relatively preserved inner speech alongside poor overt speech has been documented in some persons with aphasia (PWA), but the relationship of overt speech with inner speech is still largely unclear, as few studies have directly investigated these factors. The present study investigates the relationship of relatively preserved inner speech in aphasia with selected measures of language and cognition. Method: Thirty-eight persons with chronic aphasia (27 men, 11 women; average age 64.53 ± 13.29 years, time since stroke 8-111 months) were classified as having relatively preserved inner and overt speech (n = 21), relatively preserved inner speech with poor overt speech (n = 8), or not classified due to insufficient measurements of inner and/or overt speech (n = 9). Inner speech scores (by group) were correlated with selected measures of language and cognition from the Comprehensive Aphasia Test (Swinburn, Porter, & Al, 2004).
Results: The group with poor overt speech showed a significant relationship of inner speech with overt naming (r = .95, p < .01) and with mean length of utterance produced during a written picture description (r = .96, p < .01). Correlations between inner speech and language and cognition factors were not significant for the group with relatively good overt speech. Conclusions: As in previous research, we show that relatively preserved inner speech is found alongside otherwise severe production deficits in PWA. PWA with poor overt speech may rely more on preserved inner speech for overt picture naming (perhaps due to shared resources with verbal working memory) and for written picture description (perhaps due to reliance on inner speech due to perceived task difficulty). Assessments of inner speech may be useful as a standard component of aphasia screening, and therapy focused on improving and using inner speech may prove clinically worthwhile. Supplemental Materials: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.5303542.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28885640     DOI: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  4 in total

1.  Self-reported inner speech relates to phonological retrieval ability in people with aphasia.

Authors:  Mackenzie E Fama; Mary P Henderson; Sarah F Snider; William Hayward; Rhonda B Friedman; Peter E Turkeltaub
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2019-03-25

Review 2.  Inner Speech in Aphasia: Current Evidence, Clinical Implications, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Mackenzie E Fama; Peter E Turkeltaub
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.408

3.  The Subjective Experience of Inner Speech in Aphasia Is a Meaningful Reflection of Lexical Retrieval.

Authors:  Mackenzie E Fama; Sarah F Snider; Mary P Henderson; William Hayward; Rhonda B Friedman; Peter E Turkeltaub
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 4.  Neurolinguistics Research Advancing Development of a Direct-Speech Brain-Computer Interface.

Authors:  Ciaran Cooney; Raffaella Folli; Damien Coyle
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2018-09-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.