Ángel Pintos1, Pablo Alvarado2, Juan Planas3, Rene Jarling1. 1. Departamento de Investigación Mycologica, Cultivos Pima SL, Son Peretó 50 bajos, 07013 Palma de Mallorca, Spain Departamento de Investigación Mycologica Palma de Mallorca Spain. 2. ALVALAB, La Rochela 47, 39012 Santander, Spain ALVALAB Santander Spain. 3. Carrer can Socies 12, 07010 Palma de Mallorca, Spain Unaffiliated Palma de Mallorca Spain.
Abstract
Several new Arthrinium specimens were collected from various locations in Mediterranean and temperate Europe. A collection of the type species, A.caricicola, was obtained from dead leaves of Carexericetorum in Berlin. Sequences of four genetic markers, ITS, 28S rDNA, tef1 and tub2 were produced from almost all collections and analyzed with those available in public databases. Results are employed to support six new species: A.balearicum, A.descalsii, A.esporlense, A.ibericum, A.italicum and A.piptatheri. The type species, A.caricicola, is related to other species occurring on Carex sp.; these might represent an independent lineage from Apiospora and the remaining species of Arthrinium. Finally, the sexual morph of A.marii is described and illustrated for the first time.
Several new Arthrinium specimens were collected from various locations in Mediterranean and temperate Europe. A collection of the type species, A.caricicola, was obtained from dead leaves of Carexericetorum in Berlin. Sequences of four genetic markers, ITS, 28S rDNA, tef1 and tub2 were produced from almost all collections and analyzed with those available in public databases. Results are employed to support six new species: A.balearicum, A.descalsii, A.esporlense, A.ibericum, A.italicum and A.piptatheri. The type species, A.caricicola, is related to other species occurring on Carex sp.; these might represent an independent lineage from Apiospora and the remaining species of Arthrinium. Finally, the sexual morph of A.marii is described and illustrated for the first time.
The genus Kunze (, ) differs from other anamorphic genera because of the presence of basauxic conidiophores, which arise from structures called conidiophore mother cells (Schmidt and Kunze 1817; Hughes 1953; Minter 1985). This infrequent type of conidiogenesis can be found also in Speg., S. Hughes, Sacc. ex Grove, and Sacc. (Ellis 1971), but and are now considered synonyms of (Seifert et al. 2011; Crous and Groenewald 2013). Sacc., the sexual state of , is also considered a synonym based on the one fungus-one name policy (Hawksworth et al. 2011; Crous and Groenewald 2013), and Zimm. is thought to be the closest relative (Wang et al. 2017).There are about 80 valid species names of . The most significant contributions to species diversity of before the DNA-era were those of Schmidt and Kunze (1817), Kunze and Schmidt (1823), Fuckel (1870, 1874), Ellis (1963, 1965, 1971, 1976), and Larrondo and Calvo (1990, 1992). Genetic evidence allowed to confirm some of these taxa and propose multiple new species, e.g. Crous and Groenewald (2013), Singh et al. (2013), Dai et al. (2016, 2017), Jiang et al. (2018), and Wang et al. (2018). Smith et al. (2003) produced the first genetic data (18S and 28S rDNA) of (Corda) M.B. Ellis, supporting that this genus, as well as , represent a separate family within . This was later confirmed by Spatafora et al. (2006) and Zhang et al. (2006) who added new information from gene-coding DNA markers (18S and 28S rDNA, tef1, rpb2). Singh et al. (2013) published a ITS rDNA phylogeny including several type sequences obtained by Ogawa et al. (unpublished), such as those of Larrondo & Calvo, Larrondo & Calvo, Larrondo & Calvo, Larrondo & Calvo, and , and introduced the new species Shiv M. Singh, L.S. Yadav, P.N. Singh, Rah. Sharma & S.K. Singh (as ). Soon afterwards, Crous and Groenewald (2013) published a comprehensive re-evaluation of based on multigenic data, introducing eight new species and providing genetic data from several type strains of other taxa. They formally proposed the synonymy between and , giving priority to , but provided no data of the type species, Kunze & J.C. Schmidt. Sharma et al. (2014) published the new species R. Sharma, G. Kulk. & Shouche and built a phylogenetic tree based on rDNA that showed three main clades: one formed by M.B. Ellis, a second including Kunze & J.C. Schmidt and Pollack & C.R. Benj., and a third including the remaining known species of and . Multigenic data of the first two clades was first obtained by Ogawa et al. (unpublished), and also Crous and Groenewald (2013), although they did not include these data in their phylogenetic analyses. Some new species of were described in the next years (Crous et al. 2015; Senanayake et al. 2015; Hyde et al. 2016; Dai et al. 2016, 2017; Wang et al. 2018; Jiang et al. 2018), and the multilocus phylogenetic analysis revealed that the sister clade of was in (Wang et al. 2017).Morphological features traditionally employed to discriminate between species of include conidial shape, conidiophores, presence or absence of sterile cells and the presence of setae. Two great groups of species can be discriminated: 1) those with irregularly shaped conidia (including the type species and several others mainly associated with spp. (, ), such as Petr., Gjaerum, Koskela, , Tranzschel & Woron., Fuckel, M.B. Ellis, Rostr., and Kunze), and 2) the remaining species with globose to ellipsoid conidia, mainly associated with other plants in the (, , ), e.g. (Cooke & Massee) Arx, Crous, (Speg.) M.B. Ellis, F. Stevens, Crous, and (Sacc.) P.M. Kirk, or even a wider diversity of potential hosts, such as (Corda) Dyko & B. Sutton, , and Crous.Spatafora et al. (2006) and Zhang et al. (2006) were the first to obtain genetic data from the type species of , Sacc. (CBS 212.30, AFTOL-ID 951) and suggested that it belongs in a distinct family within . Sequences of a few other species of are also available, including K.D. Hyde, J. Fröhl. & Joanne E. Taylor (HKUCC 3143 in Smith et al. 2003), Samuels, McKenzie & D.E. Buchanan (ICMP 6888 /ATCC 58184 ex type PDD 41017 in Huhndorf et al. 2004), and Samuels, McKenzie & D.E. Buchanan (ICMP 6889-96 ex type PDD 41022 in Jaklitsch and Voglmayr 2012). Jaklitsch and Voglmayr (2012) produced a 28S rDNA phylogeny where the type species seemed not significantly different from but distinct from the other species sequenced. In addition, some sexual morphs have been biologically linked with putatively prioritary taxa: = (Turconi) Sivan. (Sivanesan 1983; Kirk 1986; Réblová et al. 2016), = (Hyde et al. 1998), and = (Réblová et al. 2016). However, none of these putative synonymies has been confirmed with genetic data, as some type collections are missing or too old for standard DNA analysis.The aim of the present study was to study new samples found in temperate and southern Europe, including one specimen of and several putatively new species, and compare them morphologically and genetically with existing taxa. In some cases, e.g. , type collections were loaned and additional sequences obtained to delimit the genetic boundaries of some species.
Materials and methods
Pure culture isolation
During the surveys conducted in 2017 and 2018, 34 fresh specimens were collected from various plant hosts in Germany, Italy, Portugal and Spain. To isolate the sexual morph, ascomata were removed from the stromata using a sterile razor blade, transferred to a water droplet mounted on a microscope slide, torn apart with forceps to release the ascospores from asci, and pipetted on a 2% malt extract agar (MEA) plate supplemented with 200 mg/L penicillin G and streptomycin sulphate. Germinated ascospores were then transferred to MEA 2% plates, which were sealed with plastic film and incubated at room temperature. To isolate the asexual morph, plate cultures were superficially scrapped with a needle to dislodge conidia that were transferred to a drop of water. The suspension was then picked up with a syringe, and small droplets sown on a MEA 2% plate supplemented with 200 mg/L penicillin G and streptomycin sulphate. The germinated conidia were then transferred to 2% MEA plates, which were sealed with laboratory film and incubated at room temperature. Cultures were deposited at CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands (CBS).
Morphological observations
Hand sections of stromata or conidiomata were made using a razor blade and mounted in water on a microscope slide. Observations were made with a Zeiss Axioscop microscope using differential interference contrast (DIC), images were taken with a FLIR camera with A. Coloma open source software. Measurements were taken with FIJI ImajeJ software, reported with maximum and minimum values in parentheses, and the range representing the mean plus and minus the standard deviation, followed by the number of measurements in parentheses. For certain images of conidiophores, the image stacking software Zerene Stacker v. 1.04 (Zerene Systems LLC, Richland, WA, USA) was used. Morphological descriptions were based on cultures sporulating on 2% MEA medium at room temperature. The original specimens were deposited at the fungarium of the Real Jardin Botanico de Madrid (MA-Fungi).
DNA isolation, amplification and phylogenetic analyses
Total DNA was extracted from dry specimens employing a modified protocol based on Murray and Thompson (1980). PCR amplification was performed with the primers ITS1F and ITS4 (White et al. 1990; Gardes and Bruns 1993) for ITS region, while LR0R and LR5 (Vilgalys and Hester 1990; Cubeta et al. 1991) were used to amplify the 28S rDNA region, T1, Bt2a, and Bt2b (Glass and Donaldson 1995; O’Donnell and Cigelnik 1997) for the β-tubulin gene (tub2), and EF1-728F, EF1-983F and EF1-1567R (Rehner and Buckley 2005) for the translation elongation factor 1a (tef1) gene. PCR reactions were performed under a program consisting of a hot start at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C, 54 °C and 72 °C (45, 30 and 45 s respectively) and a final 72 °C step 10 min. PCR products were checked in 1% agarose gels, and positive reactions were sequenced with one or both PCR primers. Chromatograms were checked searching for putative reading errors, and these were corrected.BLAST (Altschul et al. 1990) was used to select the most closely related sequences from INSDC public databases. Sequences came mainly from Crous and Groenewald (2013), Singh et al. (2013), Sharma et al. (2014), Crous et al. (2015), Senanayake et al. (2015), Dai et al. (2016, 2017), Hyde et al. (2016), Réblová et al. (2016), Jiang et al. (2018), and Wang et al. (2018), as well as Ogawa et al. (unpublished). Two distinct alignments were built in MEGA 5.0 (Tamura et al. 2011) and aligned with Clustal W with manual corrections: 1) a multigenic alignment including ITS, 28S rDNA, tub2 and tef1 data (without introns) from all and related families, and 2) a second alignment built with the same DNA markers (with introns) including only species related with (/saccharii clade). Introns were removed from tef1 and tub2, and GBlocks (Castresana 2000) was employed to remove 201 ambiguously aligned sites from ITS rDNA in the alignment, but not in the alignment of the / clade, in order to resolve this complex with all the phylogenetic signal available. The final alignment of the included five partitions with 217/461 (ITS rDNA), 229/846 (28S rDNA), 78/252 (tub2), 43/147 (tef1 EF1-728F to EF1-983F), and 76/413 (tef1 EF1-983F to EF1-1567R) variable sites, while the final alignment of the / clade had 35/535 (ITS rDNA), 18/837 (28S rDNA), 99/719 (tub2), 68/429 (tef1 EF1-728F to EF1-983F), and 4/407 (tef1 EF1-983F to EF1-1567R) variable sites. The aligned loci were loaded in PAUP* 4.0b10 (Swofford 2001) and subjected to MrModeltest 2.3 (Nylander 2004). Model GTR+G+I was selected and implemented in all partitions in MrBayes 3.2.6 (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003), where a Bayesian analysis was performed (data partitioned, two simultaneous runs, six chains, temperature set to 0.2, sampling every 100th generation) until convergence parameters were met after about 3.43M generations () or 0.9M (/sacharii clade), standard deviation having fell below 0.01. Finally, a full search for the best-scoring maximum likelihood tree was performed in RAxML (Stamatakis 2006) using the standard search algorithm (data partitioned, GTRMIX model, 2000 bootstrap replications). Significance threshold was set above 0.95 for posterior probability (PP) and 70% bootstrap proportions (BP).
Results
Phylogeny
The analysis of ITS, 28S rDNA, tef1 and tub2 data from the entire family (Fig. 1) produced a phylogeny with two main significantly supported clades: 1) composed of , and newly sequenced specimens matching the species , , and , and 2) a second clade containing all other sequences of and . Among the other specimens analyzed, some matched the genetic concept of , , , , or . Five new lineages were also found, which are formally proposed as new taxa below.
Figure 1.
50% majority rule consensus phylogram obtained in MrBayes from 25725 trees after the analysis of ITS rDNA, 28S rDNA, tef1 and tub2 sequences (introns excluded) of the family . Nodes were annotated if supported by > 70% ML BP or > 0.95 bayesian PP, but non-significant support values are exceptionally represented inside parentheses. Bold names represent samples sequenced in the present study.
The analysis of ITS, 28S rDNA, tef1 and tub2 of the species around (/ clade) (Fig. 2) showed that the clade of contains the types of and , but receives low overall support, maybe because of the incomplete data from these two species. Samples CBS 113535 and CBS 114803 were identified as too, but seem to represent an independent lineage.
Figure 2.
50% majority rule consensus phylogram obtained in MrBayes from 6750 trees after the analysis of ITS rDNA, 28S rDNA, tef1 and tub2 sequences (introns included) of the /sacchari clade. Nodes were annotated if supported by > 70% ML BP or > 0.95 bayesian PP, but non-significant support values are exceptionally represented inside parentheses. Bold names represent samples sequenced in the present study.
50% majority rule consensus phylogram obtained in MrBayes from 25725 trees after the analysis of ITS rDNA, 28S rDNA, tef1 and tub2 sequences (introns excluded) of the family . Nodes were annotated if supported by > 70% ML BP or > 0.95 bayesian PP, but non-significant support values are exceptionally represented inside parentheses. Bold names represent samples sequenced in the present study.50% majority rule consensus phylogram obtained in MrBayes from 6750 trees after the analysis of ITS rDNA, 28S rDNA, tef1 and tub2 sequences (introns included) of the /sacchari clade. Nodes were annotated if supported by > 70% ML BP or > 0.95 bayesian PP, but non-significant support values are exceptionally represented inside parentheses. Bold names represent samples sequenced in the present study.Details of strains included in this study. Types are in bold.Details of all strains included in the phylogenetic analyses. Sequences generated in this study are shown in bold.
Taxonomy
Pintos & P. Alvarado
sp. nov.828866Fig. 3
Figure 3.
A stromata on host; B asci C–F ascospores G colony on MEA. Scale bars: 200 µm (A); 20 µm (B); 5 µm (C–F).
Etymology.
Refers to the Balearic Islands (Spain), where the holotype was found.
Diagnosis.
Sexual morph: Stromata forming black, linear, confluent raised areas on host surface, with the longer axis broken at the apex, (500–)600–1500(–2000) µm × (200–)320–450(–500) µm (n = 20). Ascomata globose to subglobose, with flattened base, blackish brown, (120–) 140–180 (–200) µm in diameter (n = 30). Peridium 8–15 µm thick, consisting of 4–5 layers of cells arranged in textura angularis, externally dark brown, hyaline in the inner part. Ostiole single, central, 30–60 µm in diameter, with a periphysate channel 20–30 µm long. Peryphises broad, colourless. Hamathecium composed of dense hypha-like, broad septate paraphyses, deliquescing early, 4–6 µm thick. Asci 8-spored, unitunicate, clavate, broadly cylindrical, with an inconspicuous pedicel, rounded apex, thin-walled, without an apical apparatus, measuring (77–)80–98(–105) × (14–)15–19(–21) µm (n = 22). Ascospores 1–3-seriate, hyaline, apiospore smooth-walled, fusiform, elliptical, reniform, straight or curved, bicellular, wider at the center of the longest cell, measuring (23–)26–30(–32) × (7–)9–10(–12) µm (n = 35), basal cell 3–6 µm long, sometimes containing a droplet. Asexual morph: not observed. Culture characteristics: colonies flat spreading on MEA 2%, with moderate aerial mycelium, reverse withish.
Type.
Spain: Balearic Islands: Mallorca, Llucmajor, on undetermined , 24 Jan. 2018, A. Pintos (MA-Fungi 91723 holotype, AP24118 isotype, CBS 145129 ex-type culture).
Notes.
is related with , but has some genetic differences with this species having only 93% (482/518 bp) of its ITS rDNA, 99% (821/823 bp) of 28S rDNA, 97% (688/707 bp) of tef1, and 98% (406/413 bp) of tub2 similar. It is also phylogenetically close to , a species with a similar ascospore size, (23–)26–30(–32) × (7–)9–10(–12) µm in and (22–)23–28(–30) µm × (6–)7–9(–10) µm in . Unfortunately, the asexual morph of could not be studied to compare it with that of .A stromata on host; B asci C–F ascospores G colony on MEA. Scale bars: 200 µm (A); 20 µm (B); 5 µm (C–F).Kunze & J.C. Schmidt, Mykologische Hefte (Leipzig) 1: 9 (1817)Fig. 4
Figure 4.
A colony on host B colony on MEAC conidiophore mother cell D, E conidiophore mother cell, conidiophore bearing conidia, conidia F–H conidia I conidia with scar J lobate sterile cells. Scale bars: 200 µm (A); 5 µm (C–I); 10 µm (J). K syntype, colonies on host; L, M conidia.
Description.
Asexual morph: colonies on the host punctiform, pulvinate, 140–400 µm in diameter, blackish brown. Mycelium formed by hyaline smooth, branched hyphae, 2–5 µm in diameter. Conidiophore mother cells arising from a superficial or erumpent mycelial mat, subspherical to lageniform in shape, hyaline with brown pigments at the base, measuring (4–)5–7(–8) × (8–)9–11(–12) µm (n = 45). Conidiophores erect or ascending, simple, straight or flexuous, cylindrical, smooth-walled, colourless excepting for the thick, brown to dark brown, transversal septa, 15–100 × 3–5 µm (n = 50). Conidia fusiform or broadly spindle-shaped, smooth-walled, broader at the middle, tapering towards the narrowly rounded ends, dark brown with a hyaline rim, (37–)44–51(–55) µm in frontal view, (8–)9–11(–12) µm in side view (n = 50). Sterile cells smaller, 15–19 × 10–13 µm, and paler than conidia, bicuspidate or irregularly lobed. Culture characteristics: flat colonies spreading on MEA 2%, with moderately abundant, white cottony aerial mycelium, reverse whitish too, circular in shape with irregular edge.The conidia of and have a similar fusiform shape and length, but differ in width ((8–)9–11(–12) µm vs 12–16(–20) µm). Conidia of have also a similar shape, but turns out shorter and thinner (20–30 × 6–8.5 µm). The morphological characters of the syntype of deposited by Fries in the Herbarium of Uppsala University as Fung. Scleromyc. Suecici, fully match the specimen collected in this study. The closely related species has very different lemon-shaped conidia, while those of are curved, and those of are polygonal.
Specimens examined.
Germany: Brandenburg: south of Liberose, on dead leaves of , 14 May 2018, R. Jarling (MA-Fungi 91725).A colony on host B colony on MEAC conidiophore mother cell D, E conidiophore mother cell, conidiophore bearing conidia, conidia F–H conidia I conidia with scar J lobate sterile cells. Scale bars: 200 µm (A); 5 µm (C–I); 10 µm (J). K syntype, colonies on host; L, M conidia.M.B. Ellis, Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 34: 501 (1951)Fig. 5
Figure 5.
A colony on host B conidiophore mother cell C, D conidiophore mother cell, conidiophore bearing conidia E, F curved conidia G colony on MEA. Scale bars: 200 µm (A); 5 µm (B–F).
Arx, Gen. Fungi Sporul. Cult. (Lehr): 116 (1970).Gutner, Mater. Mikol. Fitopat. Ross. 6(1): 311 (1927).Asexual morph: Colonies are compact, round, dark to black, 80–320 in diameter. Mycelium is composed of hyaline to pale brown smooth hyphae 2–7 µm in diameter. Conidiophore mother cells spherical to lageniform, hyaline with brown pigments at the base, measuring (4–)5–7(–8) × (4–)5–6(–7) µm (n = 30). Conidiophores cylindrical unbranched, straight or flexuous, hyaline and smooth walled, with a single brown transversal septa, measuring 30–100 × 2–4 µm. (n = 30). Conidiogenous cells cylindrical 1–1.5 × 1–1.5 µm (n = 20). Conidia borne along the sides of conidiophores, curved, rounded at the ends, brown, with a hyaline germ slit and a clearly visible scar, (8–)9–10(–11) µm long in frontal view, (5–)6–7(–8) µm in side view (n = 30). Sterile cells rounded, paler than conidia. Culture characteristics flat colonies spreading on MEA 2% with moderate aerial mycelium, reverse withish.can be confused with , but conidia of var. measure (8–)9–10(–11) × (5–)6–7(–8) µm, while those of measure 11–15 × 6–8 µm. Gutner (1927) described , a sexual morph of , later combined as (Arx 1970). is closely related with (with lemon-shaped conidia) and (with larger fusiform conidia) and to a lesser extent also with (with larger fusiform conidia) and (with polygonal conidia). Ellis et al. (1951) described , a taxon with similarly shaped but smaller conidia than . The specimen studied in the present work matches the shape and size of conidia reported by Ellis et al. (1951) for , rather than those of .Germany: Brandenburg: south of Liberose, on dead leaves of sp., 28 Mar. 2018, R. Jarling (MA-Fungi 91726).A colony on host B conidiophore mother cell C, D conidiophore mother cell, conidiophore bearing conidia E, F curved conidia G colony on MEA. Scale bars: 200 µm (A); 5 µm (B–F).Pintos & P. Alvarado
sp. nov.828867Fig. 6
Figure 6.
A stromata on host B–D asci with ascospores E paraphyses F, G ascospores I, J ascospores with sheath K colony on MEA 2%; coniogenous cell giving rise to conidia; conidiogenous cells giving rise to conidia and conidia cluster G conidia. Scale bars: 200 µm (A); 10 µm (B–E); 5 µm (F–J); 5 µm (L–N).
Named to honor the eminent mycologist Enric Descals Callisen.Sexual morph: Stromata forming black fusiform spots that merge with each other with age, forming an erumpent black mass visible at the naked eye, 2–10 × 0.2–0.5 mm in size, with the long axis broken at the top revealing the ostioles of pseudothecia. Ascomata pseudothecia, subglobose with a flattened base, arranged in rows, brown to dark brown, 150–220 μm high × 150–250 μm wide (n = 20). Peridium with several layers of cells arranged in textura angularis, with a conspicuous ostiole 50–80 μm in diameter, periphysate. Hamathecium paraphyses hyphae-like, septate, hyaline. Asci cylindrical, clavate, with a short or indistinct pedicel, with rounded apices, measuring (73–)82–95(–111) × (16–)17–20(–23) μm (n = 30). Ascospores uniseriate to biseriate, hyaline, smooth-walled, apiosporic, composed of a large curved upper cell and smaller lower cell, fusiform to slightly curved in shape with narrowly rounded ends, guttulated, sometimes with a thick gelatinous sheath, (17–)18–22(–24) × (6–)7–9(–10) μm, and a basal cell 3–5 μm (n = 45). Asexual morph: Mycelium hyaline, septate, branched, hyphae 1.5–4.5 μm in diameter Conidiophores reduced to the conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells solitary on hyphae, ampuliform, hyaline to brown, 5 × 4 μm. Conidia brown, smooth, guttulate, globose to ellipsoid (5–)7(–8) µm long (n = 20) in face view, lenticular with a paler equatorial slit and 6-7 μm long in side view (n = 10). Sterile cells elongated, sometimes mixed among conidia. Culture characteristics: ascospores germinating on MEA 2% within 24–48 h. Colonies flat, spreading, with sparse aerial mycelium, pale siena.is closely related with and . It was found in the Mediterranean grass , although additional samples are needed before concluding if it could be exclusively associated with this endemic host. Ascospore size is often smaller than that of , (23–)26–30(–32) × (7–)9–10(–12) µm, but it matches that reported in the protologue of , (20–)22–24(–25) × (7–)8–9(–10) µm. However, the conidiophores of are reduced to conidiogenous cells, while those of measure about 10–45 × 1.5–2 µm, and conidia are slightly smaller in face view, measuring (5–)7(–8) µm long in and up to 8–10(–11) µm in .Spain: Balearic Islands: Mallorca, es Capdella, on dead stems of , 31 Jan. 2018, A. Pintos (MA-Fungi 91724 holotype, AP31118A isotype, CBS 145130 ex-type culture).A stromata on host B–D asci with ascospores E paraphyses F, G ascospores I, J ascospores with sheath K colony on MEA 2%; coniogenous cell giving rise to conidia; conidiogenous cells giving rise to conidia and conidia cluster G conidia. Scale bars: 200 µm (A); 10 µm (B–E); 5 µm (F–J); 5 µm (L–N).Pintos & P. Alvarado
sp. nov.828868Fig. 7
Figure 7.
A colony on MEAB–F coniogenous cell giving rise to conidia G conidia. Scale bars: 5 µm (B–G).
In reference to Esporles, the village of Mallorca (Spain) where it was found.Asexual morph: Mycelium consisting of smooth, hyaline, branched septate hyphae about 1.5–4 µm in diameter. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogeous cells. Conidiogenous cells polyblastic, aggregated in clusters on hyphae, smooth, hyaline to pale brown, ampuliform, cylindrical or lageniform, measuring 4–22 × 4–8 μm. Conidia brown, smooth, globose with a pale equatorial slit and (8–)9–12(–13) µm long in frontal view, lenticular and 6–8 μm long in side view (n = 30). Sterile cells elongated, sometimes mixed among conidia, paler than them. Culture characteristics: colonies flat, spreading, with moderate aerial mycelium, on MEA 2% surface white with yellowish patches, reverse concolour with age.Spain: Balearic Islands: Mallorca, Esporles, on dead culms of , 16 July 2017, A. Pintos (MA-Fungi 91727 holotype, AP16717 isotype, CBS 145136 ex-type culture).is closely related with and . However, does not produce brown setae as , a species until now known only from soil samples (Crous and Groenewald 2013). morphologically differs from by producing slightly bigger conidiogenous cells (4–22 × 4–8 μm vs 5–12 × 4–5 μm). These three species are genetically related (1.00 PP, 96 BP) to the group formed by , D.Q. Dai & K.D. Hyde, and the new species proposed below.A colony on MEAB–F coniogenous cell giving rise to conidia G conidia. Scale bars: 5 µm (B–G).(Sacc.) P.M. Kirk, Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 86: 409 (1986)Fig. 8
Figure 8.
lenticular-shaped colonies on host A stromata and conidiomata B, C asci D–G ascospores H colony on MEAI black masses of conidia in culture K, L conidiophore mother cell M rugose conidiogenous cell N–P conidia with lobate sterile cells O conidia. Scale bars: 200 µm (A); 10 µm (B, C); 5 µm (D–G); 200 µm (I); 5 µm (K, M, O); 10 µm (P).
Sacc., Bolm Soc. broteriana, Coimbra, sér. 1 11: 21 (1893) [Basionym].(Sacc.) Sivan., Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 81: 331 (1983).Turconi, Atti Ist. bot. R. Univ. Pavia, sér. 2 16: 251 (1916).Turconi, Atti Ist. bot. R. Univ. Pavia, sér. 2 16: 531 (1916).(Turconi) Trotter, in Saccardo, Syll. Fung. 24: 611 (1926).(Turconi) R. Sprague, Diseases Cereals Grasses N. Amer.: 121 (1950).(Turconi) Sivan., Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 81: 331 (1983).L.A. Kantsch., Bolêz. Rast. 17: 88 (1928).M.B. Ellis, Mycol. Pap. 103: 31 (1965).Samuels et al., New Zealand J. Bot. 19: 142 (1981).Samuels et al., New Zealand J. Bot. 19: 142 (1981).Sexual morph: Stromata black, fusiform, forming rows of densely arranged perithecial ascomata parallel to the main axis of the host, measuring (400–) 600–2500(–3000) × (250–)320–450(–550) µm (n = 30). Ascomata globose to subglobose, with a flattened base, blackish brown, (130–)250–290(–320) µm in diameter (n = 30). Peridium consisting of 3 or 4 layers of cells arranged in textura angularis, dark brown in the external side, hyaline in the inside, ostiole single, central, 10–30 µm in diameter, with a periphysate channel 20–35 µm long. Peryphises broad, colourless. Hamathecium composed of dense hypha-like, broad septate paraphyses, early deliquescing. Asci 8-spored, unitunicate, clavate, broadly cylindrical, pedicel indistinct, apical rounded, thin-walled, without an apical apparatus, measuring (76–) 85–98(–115) × (20–)22–26(–28) µm (n = 22). Ascospores uni- to tri-seriate, hyaline, apiosporic, smooth-walled, fusiform, elliptical, reniform, straight or curved, smooth-walled, sometimes with an internal droplet, bicellular, the widest part located in the central part of the longest cell, some ascospores have a mucose sheath covering them, (28–)32–34(–38) × (8–)9–11(–13) (n = 35) µm, basal cell 5–7 µm. Asexual morph: Mycelium branched, septate. Conidiomata on host surrounding the stromata of the sexual phase, parallel to the longitudinal axis of the stem, subepidermal, opening by longitudinal splitting of the epidermis and revealing a black conidial mass, (450–) 630–950(–1000) × (275–)345–550 (–600) µm (n = 35). Conidiophore mother cell arising from the stroma, ampuliform, lageniform, cupulate or cylindrical, sometimes with granular pigments at the apex, (5)6–10(–16) × (3–)5–7(–8) µm (n = 24). Conidiophores basauxic, polyblastic, cylindrical, hyaline to light brown, smooth or with granular pigments in all their length, straight or flexuous, septate or not, sometimes exceeding 90 μm in length × 2–4 μm wide (n = 43). Conidia globose to obovoid, dark brown, with a central scar at the base, (15–)16–20(–21) in frontal view, (14–)15–18(–19) in side view (n = 40). Sterile cells gray, irregularly angled and lobed, (15–)17–41(–42) × (10–)14–23(–25) µm (n = 30). Culture characteristics: colonies in MEA 2% flat, spreading, first white and cottony, later became dark pink, mycelium branched, septate, hyaline, reverse dark.After the works of Samuels (1981), Sivanesan (1983), Kirk (1986) and Réblová et al. (2016), , and , as well as , are all considered synonyms of . is phyllogenetically close to D.Q. Dai & K.D. Hyde, but morphologically differs from the latter because of its thinner asci (76–115 × 20–28 vs 85–100 × 30–35 μm). In addition, has longer conidiophores up to 90 μm long, and lobed sterile cells while in conidiophores do not exceed 50 μm, and sterile cells are lacking.New Zealand: Waikato: Paeroa, on dead culm of sp., 28 Feb. 1980, E.H.C. McKenzie & P.R. Johnston (ICMP 6889 ex-type culture).Spain: Galicia: Santiago de Compostela, on dead culms of , 12 Jan. 2018, A. Pintos (MA-Fungi 91731, AP12118). Balearic Islands: Mallorca, Esporlas, on dead culms of , 29 July 2017, A. Pintos (MA-Fungi 91729, AP29717). Mallorca, Jardin Botanico de Soller, on dead culms of , 24 Oct. 2017, A. Pintos (MA-Fungi 91730, AP2410173). Mallorca, Soller, on dead culms of , 15 Mar. 2018, A. Pintos (MA-Fungi 91728, AP15318).lenticular-shaped colonies on host A stromata and conidiomata B, C asci D–G ascospores H colony on MEAI black masses of conidia in culture K, L conidiophore mother cell M rugose conidiogenous cell N–P conidia with lobate sterile cells O conidia. Scale bars: 200 µm (A); 10 µm (B, C); 5 µm (D–G); 200 µm (I); 5 µm (K, M, O); 10 µm (P).Pintos & P. Alvarado
sp. nov.828869Fig. 9
Figure 9.
A ascomata with oozing ascospores B–D asci E–H ascospores I colony on MEAJ–M conidiogenous cells giving rise to conidia N sterile cell with conidia O conidia. Scale bars: 200 µm (A); 10 µm (B–D); 20 µm (C); 5 µm (E–H); 5 µm (J–O).
In reference to the Iberian Peninsula, where the holotype was collected.Sexual morph: Stromata solitary to gregarious, immersed or semi-immersed, fusiform to ellipsoid in shape, black, with the long axis broken at the top, 2–5 × 0.5–1 mm. Ascomata perithecial, subglobose with a flattened base, arranged in rows, brown to dark brown, exudating a white cirrhus of ascospores, 170–300 µm in diameter and 200–300 µm high. Peridium consisting in 3 or 4 layers of cells arranged in textura angularis. Ostiole single, central, 12–30 µm in diameter, with a periphysate channel. Hamathecium composed of dense, septate, branched paraphyses. Asci 8-spored, clavate or cylindrical, lacking an apical apparatus, shortly pedicelate, measuring (82–)90–125(–128) × (14–)15–19(–21) μm (n = 30). Ascospores uniseriate to biseriate, hyaline, smooth-walled, apiosporic, composed of a large curved upper cell and small lower cell, fusiform or slightly curved in shape with narrowly rounded ends, uniguttulated, lacking a gelatinose sheath, measuring (28–)29–34(–37) × (5–)6–8(–9) μm, and a basal cell 5–7 μm (n = 45). Asexual morph: Mycelium hyaline, septate, branched, hyphae 2–4 μm in diameter. Conidiophores reduced to the conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells aggregated in clusters on hypha or solitary, ampuliform or cylindrical, 6–12 × 3 μm. Conidia brown, smooth, globose to ellipsoid (9–)10(–12) µm long (n = 30) in face view, lenticular, with a paler equatorial slit, and (6–)7(–8) μm long (n = 40) in side view. Sterile cells elongated, rolled up, sometimes mixed among conidia. Culture characteristics: ascospores germinating on MEA 2% within 24–48 h. Colonies flat, spreading, with sparse aerial mycelium, pale siena with white patches.Portugal. Viana do Castelo: Valença do Minho, on dead culms of . 10 Jan. 2018, A. Pintos (MA-Fungi 91732 holotype, AP10118 isotype, CBS 145137 ex-type culture).belongs to the large clade around , where it shows a relation with the subclade of , , and the modern species , , , , and . The size of conidia is more or less similar to that of , where these measure about 9.0–13.5 μm in frontal view, but conidiogenous cells are a bit smaller in this species, measuring about 4.0–9.5 × 3.0–6.0 μm. has slightly smaller asci measuring 85–100 × 15–20 µm, and ellipsoid conidia covered with a mucilaginous sheath. has hyphae slightly wider, about 3–5 µm. The genetic identity of is still dubious because of the lack of a proper type, but the lineages of this species in the work of Crous and Groenewald (2013) have slightly smaller conidiogenous cells measuring 5–10 × 3–5 μm, and a different iron-grey colour of colonies in MEA.A ascomata with oozing ascospores B–D asci E–H ascospores I colony on MEAJ–M conidiogenous cells giving rise to conidia N sterile cell with conidia O conidia. Scale bars: 200 µm (A); 10 µm (B–D); 20 µm (C); 5 µm (E–H); 5 µm (J–O).Pintos & P. Alvarado
sp. nov.828870Fig. 10
Figure 10.
A, B stromata on host C asci D, E, G ascospores F ascospores with sheath H colony on MEAI–M conidiogenous cell giving rise to conidia N, O conidia. Scale bars: 200 µm (A, B); 5 µm (D–G); 5 µm (H–L, N, O); 10 µm (M).
In reference to Italy, the country where the holotype was found.Sexual morph: Stromata solitary to gregarious, inmersed to erumpent, fusiform, with long axis broken at the top by one or two cracks, 0.5–4 × 0.2–0.5 mm (n = 20). Ascomata uniseriate or irregularly arranged beneath stromata, pseudothecial, black, globose to subglobose with a flattened base, 150–200 μm high × 230–300 μm wide. Peridium composed of 5 or 6 layers of brown cells arranged in textura angularis, with a conspicuous peryphisate ostiole. Hamathecium paraphyses hyphae-like. Asci broadly cylindrical, clavate or subglobose, pedicel indistinct, apically rounded (70–)72–93(–96) × (14–)15–18(–20) μm (n = 30). Ascospores apiosporic, clavate to fusiform with narrowly rounded ends, composed of a large upper cell and small lower cell, hyaline, smooth-walled, surrounded by a gelatinose sheath, measuring (20–)21–25(–26) × (5–)6– 9(–10) μm, basal cell 3–5 μm (n = 45). Asexual morph: Mycelium consisting of smooth, hyaline, branched, septate hyphae 1.5–4 µm in diameter. Conidiophores straight or flexuous, cylindrical, colourless except for the thick brown transversal septa, smooth-walled, 10–50 × 1–3 μm. Conidiogenous cells ampuliform, cylindrical or doliform, hyaline to brown, (3–)4–7(–9) × (1.5–)2–3(–5) μm (n = 30). Conidia brown, smooth, globose in face view, lenticular in side view, 4–6 × 3–4 μm (n = 65), with a pale equatorial slit. Culture characteristics: on MEA 2%, sparse aerial mycelia, surface dirty white, reverse pale yellowish.Italy: Sicily: On dead culms of , 19 June 2016, H. Voglmayr (MA-Fungi 91733 holotype, AP221017 isotype, CBS 145138 ex-type culture).is phylogenetically close to , and to a lesser extent to . Stromata of are smaller than those of , measuring 0.45–0.99 × 0.3–0.55 mm, ascomata are perithecical, its conidiogenous cells are longer (11.5–39 × 2–3.5 μm) and branched, and conidia measure 5–9 × 5–8 μm. The conidia of are similar in size, but this species does not produce conidiophores.
Other specimens examined.
Spain: Balearic Islands: Mallorca, Puerto de Andratx, on dead culms of , 29 Jan. 2018, A. Pintos (MA-Fungi 91734, AP29118).A, B stromata on host C asci D, E, G ascospores F ascospores with sheath H colony on MEAI–M conidiogenous cell giving rise to conidia N, O conidia. Scale bars: 200 µm (A, B); 5 µm (D–G); 5 µm (H–L, N, O); 10 µm (M).Larrondo & Calvo, Mycologia 82: 397 (1990)Fig. 11
Figure 11.
A stromata on host B asci C–F ascospores G colony on MEAH–I, K conidiogenous cells giving rise to conidia J conidiophore bearing conidia L conidia and sterile cells. Scale bars: 200 µm (A); 10 µm (B); 5 µm (C–F); 5 µm (H–L).
Sexual morph: Stromata forming black fusiform spots, visible at the naked eye, with a long axis broken at the top revealing the ostioles of pseudothecia, 2–6 × 0.2–0.5 mm in size. Ascomata subglobose, sometimes with a flattened base, brownish to reddish brown, 150–190 μm high × 160–250 μm wide (n = 20). Peridium with several layers of cells arranged in textura angularis, with a conspicuous ostiole 50–7–80 μm diameter, periphysate. Hamathecium paraphyses not prominent, hyphae-like, septate, hyaline. Asci 8-spored, unitunicate, broadly cylindrical to clavate, with rounded apex and a short pedicel, (60–)70–100(–115) × (16–)18–20(–22) μm (n = 30). Ascospores fusiform to elliptical, with narrowly rounded ends, hyaline, with multiple guttules, surrounded by a mucilaginous sheath, (16)19–23(–24) × (6–)7–8(–10) μm, basal cell 2–5 (n = 30). Asexual morph: Mycelium consisting of smooth, hyaline, branched, septate hyphae measuring 1.5–5 µm in diameter. Conidiophores straight or flexuous, cylindrical, colourless except for the thick brown transverse septa, measuring 10–40 × 2–3 μm. Conidiogenous cells ampuliform to cylindrical, hyaline to brown, (3–)4–7(–11) × (1.4–)2–4(–5) μm (n = 30). Conidia, brown, smooth, granular, globose in face view, lenticular in side view, measuring (6–)7–8(–9) × 4–5(–6) µm, with a pale equatorial slit. Sterile cells elongated, brown. Culture characteristics: ascospores germinating on MEA 2% within 24–48 h. Colonies flat, spreading, with sparse aerial mycelium, reverse concolour with agA.was proposed by Larrondo and Calvo (1990) who described its asexual morph. This apparently frequent species has been isolated from the atmosphere, pharmaceutical excipients, home dust, and beach sand, as well as from various plant hosts (Crous 2013). In the present work the sexual morph is described for the first time. Genetically, samples identified as seem to represent two distinct clades (Fig. 2), with differences in tub2 and tef1 genes, but it should be further investigated with additional data before concluding if these clades should be interpreted as intraspecific variability, partially isolated lineages, or fully isolated species. Similarly, the incomplete data from the type specimens of and do not allow one to conclude if these apparently related species represent a single taxon or even belong to .Austria: Oberösterreich: St. Willibald, on dead culms of , 10 July 2016, H. Voglmayr, (MA-Fungi 91738, AP191017).Italy: Sicily: casa de la Monache, on dead culms of , 16 July 2016, H. Voglmayr (MA-Fung 91740, APVog2).Portugal: Viana do Castelo: Valença do Minho, on dead culms of , 10 Jan. 2018, A. Pintos (AP10118A).Spain: Balearic Islands: Mallorca, Esporlas, on dead culms of , 13 July 2017, A. Pintos (MA-Fungi 91735, AP13717). Ibidem., 29 July 2017, A. Pintos (AP29717). Palma de Mallorca, on , 11 July 2017, A. Pintos (MA-Fungi 91737, AP11717A). Palma de Mallorca, on dead culms of , 26 July 2017, A. Pintos (MA-Fungi 91739, AP261017).A stromata on host B asci C–F ascospores G colony on MEAH–I, K conidiogenous cells giving rise to conidia J conidiophore bearing conidia L conidia and sterile cells. Scale bars: 200 µm (A); 10 µm (B); 5 µm (C–F); 5 µm (H–L).Pintos & P. Alvarado.
sp. nov.828871Fig. 12
Figure 12.
A colony on MEAB–K conidiogenous cells giving rise to conidia. Scale bars: 5 µm (B–K).
Named after , the host plant from which it was first isolated.Asexual morph: Mycelium consisting of smooth, hyaline, branched, septate hyphae measuring 1–4 µm in diameter. Conidiophore mother cells hyaline to brown, aggregated in clusters or solitary on hyphae, ampuliform, cylindrical or doliform, 4–11 × 2–5 µm, growing above one or several hyaline cylindrical cells. Conidiophore reduced to a conidiogenous cell. Conidiogenous cells basauxic, polyblastic, sympodial, cylindrical, discrete, sometimes branched, smooth-walled, measuring 6–27 × 2–5 μm (n = 25). Conidia globose to ellipsoidal, pale brown to brown, with a thin hyaline germ-slit, 6–8 × 3–5 μm (n = 30). Sterile cells eloganted, brown, sometimes mixed among conidia, 13–16 × 4–5 μm (n = 30). Culture characteristics: on MEA 2%, colonies flat, spreading, with sparse aerial mycelium, reverse concolour with agar.Spain: Balearic Islands: Mallorca: Llucmajor, on dead stems of , 4 Aug. 2017, A. Pintos (MA-Fungi 91745 holotype, AP4817A isotype, CBS 145149 ex-type culture).is genetically close, but genetically distinct from , , , , , D.Q. Dai & K.D. Hyde, and to a lesser extent (Fig. 2) and the clade around (Fig. 1). The incomplete genetic data available is probably the cause behind the lack of significant support for some of these taxa. Morphologically, differs from because of its sympodial, branched conidiogenous cells. has shorter conidiogenous cells (3.5–8.0 μm). Finally, some sequences of are related also with this group (Fig. 2), but this species is considered the sexual morph of , with a very different genetic profile in Crous and Groenewald (2013), so its actual identity should be further investigated.A colony on MEAB–K conidiogenous cells giving rise to conidia. Scale bars: 5 µm (B–K).Kunze & J.C. Schmidt, Mykologische (Leizpig) 2: 103 (1823)Fig. 13
Figure 13.
A colony on host B colony on MEAC conidiophore mother cell D–F conidiophore bearing conidia G–H conidia in side view. Scale bars: 100 µm (A); 5 µm (C–H).
DE Candolle, 1905, Flore Francaise, Ed. 3, Tome 2, p.73, ex Mérat, Novuvelle Flore des environs de Paris, 1821, p. 16.(Kunze & J. C.Schmidt) Link, in Willdenow, Sp.pl., Edn 4 6(1): 44 (1824).(Kunze & J. C.Schmidt) Corda, Icon. Fung. (Prague) 3:8 (1839).Asexual morph: Mycelium consisting on smooth hyaline, branched, septate hyphae measuring 1.5–5 µm in diameter. Colonies are small, rounded or ovoid, dark brown, 50–400 µm in diameter. Conidiophore mother cells subspherical, lageniform or barrel-shaped, 4–5 × 3–5 µm (n = 30). Conidiophores cylindrical, straight or flexuous, septate, hyaline excepting for the thick brown or dark brown transversal septa, 20–140 × 3–4 µm (n = 30). Conidiogenous cells cylindrical, occurring between the conidiophore septa, 0.9–1.8 µm. Conidia dark brown, smooth, polygonal with rounded angles to hemispherical, measuring (8–)9–11(–12) × 8–9 µm, with one or two concentric pale rings. Sterile cells spherical, triangular or polygonal, with refractive bodies inside, paler than conidia, 6–9 µm in diameter. Culture characteristics colonies flat spreading on MEA 2%, with moderate aerial mycelium, reverse whitish, no esporulate on culture.is the only species of with polygonal conida. It shows a genetic relationship with other species found in sp. hosts, such as , , or . The present sample fits the original description of by Kunze and Schmidt (1823) as well as those by Ellis et al. (1951), Ellis (1965), and Scheuer (1996).Germany: Berlin: Köpenick, Stellingdamm, on dead leaves of , 26 April 2017, R. Jarling (MA-Fungi 91746, AP26418).A colony on host B colony on MEAC conidiophore mother cell D–F conidiophore bearing conidia G–H conidia in side view. Scale bars: 100 µm (A); 5 µm (C–H).Kunze, 1823, in Kunze & Schmidt's Mykologische Hefte, 2, p. 104; Fries, 1832, Systema Mycol., 3, p. 377Fig. 14
Figure 14.
A colony on host B conidiophore mother cells C–E conidiophore mother cells with conidiophore bearing conidia, F with sterile cell F–H conidia I colony on MEA. Scale bars: 100 µm (A); 5 µm (B–H).
Nees, 1824, apud Link in Linne, Species Plantarum, ed. 4 (Willdenow's), 6, 1, p. 45.Berkeley, 1836,Fuckel, Jb. nassau. Ver. Naturk. 27–28: 78 (1874) [1873-74]Asexual morph: Mycelium consisting on smooth hyaline branched hyphae, 2–5 µm in diameter. Colonies oval to irregular, dark blakish brown, 300–1200 × 150–650 µm. Conidiophore mother cells sub-cylindrical, hyaline to pale brown, measuring 5–7 × 5–7 µm (n = 20). Conidiophores straight to flexuous, cylindrical, hyaline except for the thick brown to dark brown transversal septa, 30–130 × 2–4 µm (n = 20). Conidia brown, smooth, lemon-shaped in face view, measuring (10–)11–14(–15) × (5–)6–8(–9) µm (n = 45), triangular with the outer edge curved and rounded angles in side view, measuring 5–8 µm thick. Sterile cells paler than conidia, subspherical or triangular, 5–8 µm wide. Culture characteristics: on MEA 2% colonies cottony, white with grey patches, reverse pale grey.is the only species of with lemon-shaped conidia. Kunze (1823) considered that represents a synonym of this species, and Cooke (1954) considered Fuckel a synonym of this species too. The only sample analyzed in the present work fits the descriptions of this species by Kunze (1823), Ellis et al. (1951), Ellis (1965) and Scheuer (1996). This sample was found in sp., but this remarkable species has been often reported from sp. hosts (Ellis 1965). Interestingly, other species occurring in sp. present also conidia with unusual shapes, e.g. (polygonal), (curved), and or (fusiform).Spain: Balearic Islands: Mallorca, Escorca, on dead leaves of sp., 21 Feb. 2018, A. Pintos 21218 (MA-Fungi 91749).
Other specimens studied.
: Spain: Galicia: Santiago de Compostela, city garden, culms of sp., 11 Jan. 2018, A. Pintos 11118A (MA-Fungi 91722). : Spain: Balearic Islands: Mallorca, Esporles, on dead culms of , 29 July 2017, A. Pintos (MA-Fungi 91744, AP29717A). Ibidem., on dead stem of , 3 Feb. 2018, A. Pintos (MA-Fungi 91743, AP3218). Jardin Botanico de Soller, on dead culms of , 24 Oct. 2017, A. Pintos (MA-Fungi 91742, AP2410172A). Puigpunyent, on dead culms of , 28 Dec. 2017, A. Pintos (MA-Fungi 91741, AP281217A1). : Spain: Balearic Islands: Mallorca, Esporlas, on dead culms of , 8 Aug. 2017, A. Pintos (MA-Fungi 91747, AP8817). Jardin Botanico de Soller, on dead culms of sp., 24 Oct. 2017, A. Pintos (AP2420171). Soller, on dead culms of , 10 Apr. 2018, A. Pintos (MA-Fungi 91748, AP10418).A colony on host B conidiophore mother cells C–E conidiophore mother cells with conidiophore bearing conidia, F with sterile cell F–H conidia I colony on MEA. Scale bars: 100 µm (A); 5 µm (B–H).
Discussion
is thought to represent the asexual morph of because genetic data of (type species of , Müller and Arx 1962) grouped together with other species of (Crous and Groenewald 2013; Senanayake et al. 2015; Réblová et al. 2016). Unfortunately, no data from the type species of , , was available to confirm this synonymy. In the present work, a phylogenetic relationship was found between a specimen identified as and other species of mainly occurring in sp., such as , , and . Moreover, this clade was not significantly related with all other species of and found in other hosts or substrates, suggesting that both clades could be interpreted as independent genera sister to . In this case, the synonymy between and could be rejected, requiring new combinations. However, this hypothesis should be further confirmed after the analysis of the remaining known species occurring in hosts, such as , , , , , , or .species have been found in several different plant hosts (Ramos et al. 2010; Sharma 2014), where they sometimes cause plant diseases (Martínez-Cano et al. 1992; Mavragani et al. 2007; Chen et al. 2014; Li et al. 2016). They are also isolated from lichens (He and Zhang 2012), marine algae (Suryanarayanan 2012), soil (Singh et al. 2013) and can even cause infections in humans (Rai 1989; Zhao et al. 1990; Hoog et al. 2000). In the present study six new species of are proposed: , , , , , and , all of them found in the Mediterranean biogeographical region, excepting for , which was found in the Atlantic areas of Spain. All these new taxa were found growing on plant hosts of the family, such as or . However, was the species most frequently found in the surveys, occurring on the grasses and , in agreement with the data reported by Crous and Groenewald (2013). was found also on and less commonly in , while and were associated with the bamboos and sp. Several colonies of were found growing on as well, where they developed acervular conidiomata, a feature not observed in the protologue of this species, and therefore not considered diagnostic, in the same way as conidial shape, presence of setae, or lobate sterile cells.(Samuels et al. 1981) is considered a synonym of (Sivanesan 1983; Kirk 1986). Multigenic data from the ex-type culture ICMP 6889 of was obtained so as to compare it with the newly found specimens of , and no significant difference could be found. Interestingly, the collections of studied in the present work presented sterile lobed cells, a feature not mentioned in the protologue of . The genetic data available from and (28S and tub2) are not significantly different from those of and , although additional markers would be needed to confirm a putative synonymy.
Table 1.
Details of strains included in this study. Types are in bold.
Species
Isolate
CBS culture
Herbarium code
Host
ITS rDNA
28S rDNA
tef1
tub2
A.arundinis
AP11118A
CBS 145128
MA-Fungi 91722
Bambusa sp.
MK014835
MK014868
MK017945
MK017974
A.balearicum, holotype
AP24118
CBS 145129
MA-Fungi 91723
Undetermined poaceae
MK014836
MK014869
MK017946
MK017975
A.caricicola
AP23518
CBS 145127
MA-Fungi 91725
Carexericetorum
MK014838
MK014871
MK017948
MK017977
A.curvatumvar.minus.
AP25418
CBS 145131
MA-Fungi 91726
hojas de Carex sp.
MK014839
MK014872
MK017949
MK017978
A.descalsii, holotype
AP31118A
CBS 145130
MA-Fungi 91724
Ampelodesmosmauritanicus
MK014837
MK014870
MK017947
MK017976
A.esporlense, holotype
AP16717
CBS 145136
MA-Fungi 91727
Phyllostachysaurea
MK014845
MK014878
MK017954
MK017983
A.hysterinum
AP15318
CBS 145132
MA-Fungi 91728
Phyllostachysaurea
MK014840
MK014873
MK017950
MK017979
ICMP6889
Bambusa
MK014841
MK014874
MK017951
MK017980
AP29717
CBS 145133
MA-Fungi 91729
Phyllostachysaurea
MK014842
MK014875
MK017952
MK017981
AP2410173
CBS 145134
MA-Fungi 91730
Phyllostachysaurea
MK014843
MK014876
AP12118
CBS 145135
MA-Fungi 91731
Phyllostachysaurea
MK014844
MK014877
MK017953
MK017982
A.ibericum, holotype
AP10118
CBS 145137
MA-Fungi 91732
Arundodonax
MK014846
MK014879
MK017955
MK017984
A.italicum, holotype
AP221017
CBS 145138
MA-Fungi 91733
Arundodonax
MK014847
MK014880
MK017956
MK017985
AP29118
CBS 145139
MA-Fungi 91734
Phragmitesaustralis
MK014848
MK014881
MK017957
MK017986
A.marii
AP13717
CBS 145140
MA-Fungi 91735
Arundodonax
MK014849
MK014882
MK017958
MK017987
AP10118A
Phragmitesaustralis
MK014850
MK014883
MK017959
MK017988
AP11717A
CBS 145141
MA-Fungi 91737
Ampelodesmosmauritanicus
MK014851
MK014884
MK017960
MK017989
AP191017
MA-Fungi 91738
Phragmitesaustralis
MK014852
MK014885
MK017961
MK017990
AP261017
CBS 145142
MA-Fungi 91739
Piptatherimiliaceum
MK014853
MK014886
MK017962
MK017991
Vog2
CBS 145143
MA-Fungi 91740
Phragmitesaustralis
MK014854
MK014887
MK017963
MK017992
AP31118
CBS 145144
MA-Fungi 91736
Ampelodesmosmauritanicus
MK014855
MK014888
MK017964
MK017993
A.phragmitis
AP281217A1
CBS 145145
MA-Fungi 91741
Phragmitesaustralis
MK014856
MK014889
MK017965
MK017994
AP2410172A
CBS 145146
MA-Fungi 91742
Phragmitesaustralis
MK014857
MK014890
MK017966
MK017995
AP3218
CBS 145147
MA-Fungi 91743
Phragmitesaustralis
MK014858
MK014891
MK017967
MK017996
AP29717A
CBS 145148
MA-Fungi 91744
Arundodonax
MK014859
MK014892
MK017968
MK017997
A.piptatheri, holotype
AP4817A
CBS 145149
MA-Fungi 91745
Piptatherummiliaceum
MK014860
MK014893
MK017969
A.puccinioides
AP26418
CBS 145150
MA-Fungi 91746
Carexarenaria
MK014861
MK014894
MK017970
MK017998
A.rasikravindrii
AP8817
CBS 145151
MA-Fungi 91747
Phyllostachysaurea
MK014862
MK014895
AP10418
CBS 145152
MA-Fungi 91748
Phyllostachysaurea
MK014863
MK014896
MK017971
MK017999
AP2410171
CBS 145153
Phyllostachysaurea
MK014864
MK014897
MK017972
MK018000
A.sporophleum
AP21118
CBS 145154
MA-Fungi 91749
Juncus sp.
MK014865
MK014898
MK017973
MK018001
Table 2.
Details of all strains included in the phylogenetic analyses. Sequences generated in this study are shown in bold.
Authors: Xia Tang; Ishani D Goonasekara; Ruvishika S Jayawardena; Hong Bo Jiang; Jun F Li; Kevin D Hyde; Ji C Kang Journal: Biodivers Data J Date: 2020-12-14
Authors: Sun Lul Kwon; Minseo Cho; Young Min Lee; Changmu Kim; Soo Min Lee; Byoung Jun Ahn; Hanbyul Lee; Jae-Jin Kim Journal: Mycobiology Date: 2022-02-24 Impact factor: 1.858
Authors: Sun Lul Kwon; Myung Soo Park; Seokyoon Jang; Young Min Lee; Young Mok Heo; Joo-Hyun Hong; Hanbyul Lee; Yeongseon Jang; Ji-Hyun Park; Changmu Kim; Gyu-Hyeok Kim; Young Woon Lim; Jae-Jin Kim Journal: IMA Fungus Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 3.515
Authors: Sirinapa Konta; Kevin D Hyde; Prapassorn D Eungwanichayapant; Samantha C Karunarathna; Milan C Samarakoon; Jianchu Xu; Lucas A P Dauner; Sasith Tharanga Aluthwattha; Saisamorn Lumyong; Saowaluck Tibpromma Journal: Life (Basel) Date: 2021-05-26
Authors: Abdul Qayoom Majeedano; Jie Chen; Tianhui Zhu; Shujiang Li; Zeeshan Ghulam Nabi Gishkori; Sumbul Mureed Mastoi; Gang Wang Journal: J Fungi (Basel) Date: 2022-03-02