Literature DB >> 34073589

Multigene Phylogeny Reveals Haploanthostomella elaeidis gen. et sp. nov. and Familial Replacement of Endocalyx (Xylariales, Sordariomycetes, Ascomycota).

Sirinapa Konta1,2,3, Kevin D Hyde2, Prapassorn D Eungwanichayapant3, Samantha C Karunarathna1,4,5, Milan C Samarakoon2, Jianchu Xu1,4,5, Lucas A P Dauner1, Sasith Tharanga Aluthwattha6,7, Saisamorn Lumyong8,9, Saowaluck Tibpromma1,4,5.   

Abstract

During our investigation of palm fungi in Thailand, two interesting taxa from Elaeis guineensis and Metroxylon sagu (Arecaceae) were collected. Based on phylogenetic analyses of a combined dataset of ITS, LSU, rpb2, and tub2 nucleotide sequences as well as unique morphological characteristics, we introduce the new genus Haploanthostomella within Xylariales, and a new species Endocalyx metroxyli. Additionally, in our study, the genus Endocalyx is transferred to the family Cainiaceae based on its brown conidia and molecular phylogenetic evidence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apiosporaceae; Cainiaceae; Thailand; Xylariales; fungi; palms

Year:  2021        PMID: 34073589      PMCID: PMC8227165          DOI: 10.3390/life11060486

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Life (Basel)        ISSN: 2075-1729


1. Introduction

Palm trees represent a family of perennial lianas and consist of many diverse species worldwide, with the fossil record indicating around 65 million years of evolutionary history [1]. Microfungi on palms have been studied, but only a few have been analyzed using morphology and DNA sequence data. Several fungal species are currently unknown to science, with the total number estimated at somewhere between 2.2 and 3.8 million [2]. Thus, palms are a particularly interesting plant family for studying microfungi species unknown to science. The subclass Xylariomycetidae has recently been updated to contain three orders (Amphisphaeriales, Delonicicolales, and Xylariales) and 35 families [3]. Recently, the family Induratiaceae was introduced in this subclass by Samarakoon et al. [4] with an updated phylogeny of Xylariales. Cainiaceae is a family of particular interest, as all members in this family tend to be found on monocotyledons, the majority of which are grasses [5]. In previous studies, Cainiaceae was accepted in the Xylariales [3,6]. Later, Hongsanan et al. [7], and Wijayawardene et al. [8] assigned Cainiaceae to the Xylariomycetidae as an incertae sedis family. The Xylariales is one of the largest orders and includes 15 families, 160 genera, and 52 genera incertae sedis [3]. Family Cainiaceae was introduced by Krug [9] to include species of Cainia with unique apical rings in the asci that consist of a series of rings and ascospores with longitudinal germ slits. An asexual morph of Cainiaceae was coelomycetous with black, scattered, immersed pycnidial conidiomata; hyaline, denticulate, sympodially proliferating conidiophores; hyaline, filiform, branched or simple, septate conidiogenous cells with one to three phialides; and hyaline, elongate fusiform, falcate to lunate, unicellular or septate conidia, with pointed ends [10]. At present, seven genera have been accepted into this family (Alishanica, Amphibambusa, Arecophila, Atrotorquata, Cainia, Longiappendispora, and Seynesia) [3,11]. Since 2014, fungal research in Thailand has revealed a high diversity of novel species [12,13,14]. In this study, we found fungal species unknown to science from Thailand. The phylogeny results show that Endocalyx grouped within Cainiaceae, and so we transferred Endocalyx from Apiosporaceae (Amphisphaeriales) to Cainiaceae (Xylariales) based on both morphology and multigene phylogeny. We also introduce the new species Endocalyx metroxyli, collected from the economically important oil palm host (Elaeis guineensis). Lastly, we introduce the new genus Haploanthostomella associated with true sago palm (Metroxylon sagu).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection, Isolation, and Identification

Saprobic fungi growing on dead leaves, petioles and rachis of Elaeis guineensis and Metroxylon sagu were collected in Krabi and Surat Thani Provinces of Thailand, placed in ziplock bags and brought to the mycology laboratory at the Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, and morphological characteristics were observed. Specimens were examined following the methods provided by Konta et al. [15]. Single spore isolates were obtained following the method of Senanayake et al. [16], using malt extract agar (MEA) and incubating at 25–28 °C overnight. Germinating conidia were transferred to new MEA media and pure cultures were kept at 25–28 °C. Specimens and cultures were deposited in the herbarium of Mae Fah Luang University (MFLU) and Mae Fah Luang University Culture Collection (MFLUCC), Chiang Rai, Thailand, respectively. Faces of Fungi and Index Fungorum numbers were registered as outlined in Jayasiri et al. [17] and Index Fungorum [18].

2.2. DNA Extraction and Amplification (PCR)

Genomic DNA was extracted from fruiting bodies of Haploanthostomella elaeidis and fungal mycelium of Endocalyx metroxyli. DNA extraction and amplification were followed Dissanayake et al. [19]. Konta et al.’s method [16] was followed for PCR amplification of ITS, LSU, SSU, tef1-α and rpb2, while O’Donnell and Cigelnik’s method [20] was followed for PCR amplification of the tub2 region. Amplification was done using the primers ITS5 and ITS4 for the internal transcribed spacer regions and intervening 5.8S rDNA (ITS), the primers LR5 and LR0R for the large subunit (LSU) rRNA gene, the primer pair fRPB2-5f and fRPB2-7cR for the RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (rpb2) gene, and the primers T1 and T22 for the partial gene β-tubulin (tub2). PCR amplifications were performed using 1× PCR buffer with 8.5 μL ddH2O, 12.5 μL 2× Easy Taq PCR SuperMix (mixture of Easy Taq TM DNA Polymerase, dNTPs and optimized buffer (Beijing Trans Gen Biotech Co., Beijing, China)), 2 μL of DNA template, and 1 μL each of forward and reverse primers (10 pM) in a final volume of 25 μL. The cycle conditions in the initiation step were started at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles at 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 50 s, 72 °C for 30 s (for ITS, LSU); 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles at 95 °C for 1 min, 54 °C for 2 min, 72 °C for 1:5 min (for rpb2); 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 1 min, 52 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 1:5 min (for tub2); a final elongation step at 72 °C for 10 min and a final hold at 4 °C were done as the last steps. Purification and sequencing were performed by Sangon Biotech Co., Shanghai, China. Consensus sequences were computed using SeqMan software, and new sequences generated in this study were deposited in GenBank (Table 1).
Table 1

Names, strain numbers and corresponding GenBank accession numbers of the taxa used in phylogenetic analyses, the ex-type strains are in bold.

OrderFamilySpeciesStrain No.GenBank Accession No.References
ITSLSU rpb2 tub2
AmphisphaerialesApiosporaceae Arthrinium balearicum AP24118MK014869MK014836-MK017946[21]
AmphisphaerialesApiosporaceae Arthrinium caricicola CBS 145127MK014871MK014838-MK017948[21]
AmphisphaerialesApiosporaceae Arthrinium hydei CBS 114990KF144890KF144936-KF144982[22]
AmphisphaerialesApiosporaceae Arthrinium phragmitis CBS 135458KF144909KF144956-KF145001[22]
AmphisphaerialesApiosporaceae Arthrinium pseudospegazzinii CBS 102052KF144911KF144958-KF145002[22]
AmphisphaerialesApiosporaceae Nigrospora aurantiaca CGMCC 3.18130NR_153477NG_069394-KY019465[23]
AmphisphaerialesApiosporaceae Nigrospora brasiliensis CMM 1214KY569629--MK720816[24]
AmphisphaerialesApiosporaceae Nigrospora zimmermanii CBS 290.62KY385309-KY806276KY385317[23]
AmphisphaerialesBeltraniaceae Beltrania rhombica CBS 123.58 = IMI 072432MH553990MH554209MH554899MH704631[25]
AmphisphaerialesBeltraniaceae Beltraniella endiandrae CBS 137976KJ869128KJ869185--[26]
AmphisphaerialesBeltraniaceae Beltraniopsis neolitseae CBS 137974KJ869126KJ869183--[26]
AmphisphaerialesBeltraniaceae Arecophila bambusae HKUCC 4794-AF452038--[27]
XylarialesCainiaceae Alishanica miscanthii FU31025MK503821MK503827--[3]
XylarialesCainiaceae Amphibambusa bambusicola MFLUCC 11-0617KP744433KP744474--[28]
XylarialesCainiaceae Atrotorquata lineata HKUCC 3263 AF009807---Unpublished
XylarialesCainiaceae Cainia anthoxanthis MFLUCC 15-0539KR092787KR092777--[5]
XylarialesCainiaceae Cainia desmazieri CAIKT949896KT949896--[29]
XylarialesCainiaceae Cainia globosa MFLUCC 13-0663KX822127KX822123--[30]
XylarialesCainiaceae Cainia graminis CBS 136.62KR092793AF431949--[5,31]
XylarialesCainiaceae Longiappendispora chromolaenae MFLUCC 17-1485MT214370MT214464--[11]
XylarialesCainiaceae Endocalyx cinctus JCM 7946LC228648LC228704--[32]
XylarialesCainiaceae Endocalyx metroxyli MFLUCC 15-0723AMT929162MT929313--This study
XylarialesCainiaceae Endocalyx metroxyli MFLUCC 15-0723BMT929163MT929314-MT928155This study
XylarialesCainiaceae Endocalyx metroxyli MFLUCC 15-0723C-MT929315--This study
XylarialesCainiaceae Seynesia erumpens SMH 1291-AF279410--[33]
XylarialesClypeosphaeriaceae Clypeosphaeria mamillana CBS 140735KT949897KT949897MF489001MH704637[29,34]
XylarialesConiocessiaceae Coniocessia anandra Co108GU553338GU553349--[35]
XylarialesConiocessiaceae Coniocessia cruciformis Co116GU553336GU553347--[35]
XylarialesConiocessiaceae Coniocessia maxima Co117GU553332GU553344--[35]
XylarialesConiocessiaceae Coniocessia minima Co111GU553334GU553345--[35]
XylarialesConiocessiaceae Coniocessia nodulisporioides CBS 281.77T-AJ875224--[36]
XylarialesConiocessiaceae Paraxylaria rosacearum TASM 6132MG828941MG829050--[37]
XylarialesDiatrypaceae Allocryptovalsa polyspora MFLUCC 17-0364 MF959500MF959503-MG334556[38]
XylarialesDiatrypaceae Allodiatrype arengae MFLUCC 15-0713 MN308411MN308402MN542886MN340297[39]
XylarialesDiatrypaceae Cryptovalsa rabenhorstii CreI = CBS 125574KC774567KC774567--[40]
XylarialesDiatrypaceae Diatrype disciformis CBS 197.49-DQ470964DQ470915-[41]
XylarialesDiatrypaceae Diatrypella verruciformis UCROK1467JX144793--JX174093[42]
XylarialesDiatrypaceae Eutypa lata CBS 208.87DQ006927MH873755-DQ006969[43,44]
XylarialesDiatrypaceae Eutypella caricae EL5CAJ302460---[45]
XylarialesDiatrypaceae Halodiatrype salinicola MFLUCC 15-1277KX573915--KX573932[46]
XylarialesDiatrypaceae Monosporascus cannonballus CMM3646JX971617---Unpublished
XylarialesDiatrypaceae Neoeutypella baoshanensis EL51C, CBS 274.87AJ302460---[45]
XylarialesDiatrypaceae Pedumispora rhizophorae BCC44877KJ888853KJ888850--[47]
XylarialesDiatrypaceae Peroneutypa longiasca MFLUCC 17-0371MF959502MF959505-MG334558[38]
XylarialesFasciatisporaceae Fasciatispora arengae MFLUCC 15-0326aMK120275MK120300MK890794MK890793[48]
XylarialesFasciatisporaceae Fasciatispora calami MFLUCC 15-0294-MF459055-MF459056[49]
XylarialesFasciatisporaceae Fasciatispora cocoes MFLUCC 18-1445MN482680MN482675MN481517MN505154[13]
XylarialesFasciatisporaceae Fasciatispora nypae MFLUCC 11-0382-KP744484--[28]
XylarialesFasciatisporaceae Fasciatispora petrakii -AY083828--Unpublished
XylarialesGraphostromataceae Biscogniauxia nummularia MUCL 51395KY610382KY610427KY624236KX271241[50]
XylarialesGraphostromataceae Camillea obularia ATCC 28093KY610384KY610429KY624238KX271243[50]
XylarialesGraphostromataceae Graphostroma platystomum CBS 270.87JX658535DQ836906KY624296HG934108[50,51,52,53]
XylarialesGraphostromataceae Obolarina dryophila MUCL 49882GQ428316GQ428316KY624284GQ428322[50,54]
XylarialesHansfordiaceae Hansfordia pulvinate CBS 194.56MK442585MH869122KU684307-[24]
XylarialesHansfordiaceae Hansfordia pulvinate CBS 144422MK442587MK442527--[24]
XylarialesHypoxylaceae Annulohypoxylon truncatum CBS 140778KY610419KY610419KY624277KX376352[50,55]
XylarialesHypoxylaceae Anthocanalis sparti MFLUCC 14-0010KP297394KP340536KP340522KP406605[54]
XylarialesHypoxylaceae Anthostoma decipiens CD = CBS 133221KC774565KC774565--[40]
XylarialesHypoxylaceae Daldinia concentrica CBS 113277AY616683KY610434KY624243KC977274[50,56,57]
XylarialesHypoxylaceae Durotheca depressa BCC28073---GQ160492[58]
XylarialesHypoxylaceae Entonaema liquescens ATCC 46302KY610389KY610443KY624253KX271248[50]
XylarialesHypoxylaceae Hypomontagnella monticulosa MUCL 54604KY610404KY610487KY624305KX271273[50]
XylarialesHypoxylaceae Hypoxylon fragiforme MUCL 51264KC477229KM186295KM186296KX271282[50,59,60]
XylarialesHypoxylaceae Jackrogersella multiformis CBS 119016KC477234KY610473KY624290KX271262[50,55,57]
XylarialesHypoxylaceae Pyrenomyxa morganii CBS 116990TAM749920---[61]
XylarialesHypoxylaceae Pyrenomyxa picea ILLS 58257-EF562506--[62]
XylarialesHypoxylaceae Pyrenopolyporus hunteri MUCL 52673KY610421KY610472KY624309KU159530[50,55]
XylarialesHypoxylaceae Rhopalostroma indicum CBS 113035MH862909MH874483--[44]
XylarialesHypoxylaceae Thamnomyces dendroidea CBS 123578FN428831KY610467KY624232KY624313[50,63]
XylarialesHypoxylaceae Thuemenella cubispora CBS 119807JX658531EF562508--[62]
XylarialesHypoxylaceae Phylacia sagrana CBS 119992AM749919---[61]
XylarialesHypoxylaceae Pyrenopolyporus symphyon TBRC:8873MH938529MH938538MK165428MK165419[64]
XylarialesInduratiaceae Emarcea castanopsidicola CBS 117105MK762710MK762717MK791285MK776962[64]
XylarialesInduratiaceae Emarcea eucalyptigena CBS 139908MK762711MK762718MK791286MK776963[64]
XylarialesInduratiaceae Induratia fengyangensis CGMCC 2862HM034856HM034859HM034849HM034843[65]
XylarialesInduratiaceae Induratia thailandica MFLUCC 17-2669MK762707MK762714MK791283 MK776960[64]
XylarialesLopadostomataceae Creosphaeria sassafras STMA 14087KY610411KY610468KY624265KX271258[50]
XylarialesLopadostomataceae Lopadostoma turgidum CBS 133207KC774618KC774618KC774563MF489024[29,40]
XylarialesMicrodochiaceae Idriella lunata MUCL 4103KC775734KC775709--[66]
XylarialesMicrodochiaceae Idriella lunata CBS 204.56KP859044KP858981--[67]
XylarialesMicrodochiaceae Microdochium phragmitis CBS 423.78KP859012KP858948KP859121KP859076[67]
XylarialesPolystigmataceae Polystigma fulvum MFLU 18-0261MK429738MK429727--[68]
XylarialesPolystigmataceae Polystigma rubrum MFLU 15-3091KY594023MF981079--[68]
XylarialesRequienellaceae Acrocordiella occulta RS9 KT949893KT949893--[29]
XylarialesRequienellaceae Acrocordiella omanensis SQUCC 15091MG584568MG584570--[69]
XylarialesRequienellaceae Requienella fraxini RS2KT949909KT949909--[29]
XylarialesRequienellaceae Requienella seminuda RS12 = CBS 140502KT949912KT949912MK523300-[29,64]
XylarialesXylariaceae Abieticola koreana EML-F0010-1JN977612JQ014618KP792128KP792126[70]
XylarialesXylariaceae Amphirosellinia nigrospora HAST 91092308GU322457-GQ848340GQ495951[71]
XylarialesXylariaceae Anthostomella formosa MFLUCC 14-0170KP297403KP340544KP340531KP406614[59]
XylarialesXylariaceae Anthostomella helicofissa MFLUCC 14-0173KP297406KP340547KP340534KP406617[59]
XylarialesXylariaceae Anthostomella obesa MFLUCC 14-0171KP297405KP340546KP340533KP406616[59]
XylarialesXylariaceae Anthostomella pseudobambusicola MFLUCC 15-0192KU940153KU863141--[72]
XylarialesXylariaceae Anthostomelloides brabeji CBS 110128EU552098EU552098--[73]
XylarialesXylariaceae Anthostomelloides forlicesenica MFLUCC 14-0558KP297397KP340539-KP406608[66]
XylarialesXylariaceae Anthostomelloides krabiensis MFLUCC 15-0678 KX305927KX305928KX305929-[30]
XylarialesXylariaceae Anthostomelloides leucospermi CBS:110126EU552100---[73]
XylarialesXylariaceae Anthostomelloides proteae CBS 110127EU552101---[73]
XylarialesXylariaceae Astrocystis mirabilis 94070803 HASTGU322448-GQ844835GQ495941[71]
XylarialesXylariaceae Brunneiperidium gracilentum MFLUCC 14-0011 Ex-type KP297400KP340542KP340528KP406611[66]
XylarialesXylariaceae Collodiscula japonica CBS 124266 JF440974JF440974KY624273KY624316[50,74]
XylarialesXylariaceae Coniolariella gamsii Co27IRAN 842C, CBS114379 (T)GU553325GU553329--[35]
XylarialesXylariaceae Entalbostroma erumpens ICMP 21152KX258206-KX258204KX258205[75]
XylarialesXylariaceae Entoleuca mammata J.D.R. 100 GU300072-GQ844782GQ470230[71]
XylarialesXylariaceae Euepixylon sphaeriostomum J.D.R. 261GU292821-GQ844774GQ470224[71]
XylarialesXylariaceae Halorosellinia oceanica SGLAf82EU715635---[76]
XylarialesXylariaceae Hypocopra rostrata NRRL 66178KM067909---[77]
XylarialesXylariaceae Hypocreodendron sanguineum J.D.R. 169GU322433-GQ844819 GQ487710 [71]
XylarialesXylariaceae Kretzschmaria clavus YMJ 114EF026126-GQ844789EF025611[71,78]
XylarialesXylariaceae Linosporopsis ischnotheca LIF1 = CBS 145761 MN818952MN818952 MN820708 MN820715[79]
XylarialesXylariaceae Lunatiannulus irregularis MFLUCC 14-0014KP297398KP340540KP340526KP406609[57]
XylarialesXylariaceae Nemania serpens CBS 679.86KU683765-KU684284KU684188[80]
XylarialesXylariaceae Neoxylaria arengae MFLUCC 15-0292MT496747-MT502418-[81]
XylarialesXylariaceae Podosordaria mexicana WSP 176 GU324762-GQ853039GQ844840[71]
XylarialesXylariaceae Poronia punctata CBS 656.78 KT281904KY610496KY624278KX271281[5,50]
XylarialesXylariaceae Rosellinia aquila MUCL 51703KY610392KY610460KY624285KX271253[50]
XylarialesXylariaceae Rostrohypoxylon terebratum CBS 119137DQ631943DQ840069DQ631954DQ840097[82,83]
XylarialesXylariaceae Ruwenzoria pseudoannulata MUCL 51394KY610406KY610494KY624286KX271278[50]
XylarialesXylariaceae Sarcoxylon compunctum CBS 359.61KT281903KY610462KY624230KX271255[5,50]
XylarialesXylariaceae Stilbohypoxylon elaeicola Y.M.J. 173EF026148-GQ844826EF025616[71]
XylarialesXylariaceae Stilbohypoxylon elaeidis MFLUCC 15-0295aMT496745MT496755MT502416MT502420[81]
XylarialesXylariaceae Stilbohypoxylon quisquiliarum Y.M.J. 172EF026119-GQ853020EF025605[71]
XylarialesXylariaceae Vamsapriya bambusicola MFLUCC 11-0477KM462835KM462836KM462834KM462833[84]
XylarialesXylariaceae Vamsapriya breviconidiophora MFLUCC 14-0436MF621584MF621588--[39]
XylarialesXylariaceae Vamsapriya indica MFLUCC 12-0544KM462839KM462840KM462841KM462838[84]
XylarialesXylariaceae Vamsapriya khunkonensis MFLUCC 11-0475KM462830KM462831KM462829KM462828[84]
XylarialesXylariaceae Vamsapriya yunnana KUMCC 18-0008MG833874MG833873MG833875-[85]
XylarialesXylariaceae Virgaria boninensis JCM 18624AB740956AB740960--[86]
XylarialesXylariaceae Virgaria nigra CBS 128006MH864744MH876180--[44]
XylarialesXylariaceae Xylaria hypoxylon CBS 122620KY610407KY610495KY624231KX271279[50,87]
Sordariomycetes generaincertae sedisXylariales genera incertae sedis Melanographium phoenicis MFLUCC 18-1481MN482677MN482678--[13]
Sordariomycetes genera incertae sedisXylariales genera incertae sedis Ceratocladium microspermum CBS126092MH864077MH875534--[44]
XylarialesXylariales genera incertae sedis Ascotricha chartarum CBS 234.97KF893284--KF893271[88]
XylarialesXylariales genera incertae sedis Ascotricha longipila OUCMBI110118 (T)KC503896--KF893265[88]
XylarialesXylariales genera incertae sedis Ascotricha lusitanica CBS 462.70 (IT) KF893289--KF893275[88]
XylarialesXylariales genera incertae sedis Ascotricha parvispora OUCMBI110001 (T)JX014298--KF893267[88]
XylarialesXylariales genera incertae sedis Ascotricha sinuosa OUCMBI101190 (T) JX014299--KF893266[88]
Xylariales Xylariales genera incertae sedis Alloanthostomella rubicola MFLUCC 14-0175KP297407KP340548KP340535KP406618[89]
XylarialesXylariales genera incertae sedis Circinotrichum cycadis CPC 17285KJ869121KJ869178--[26]
XylarialesXylariales genera incertae sedis Circinotrichum maculiforme CPC 24566KR611874KR611895--[90]
XylarialesXylariales genera incertae sedis Circinotrichum papakurae CBS 101373KR611876KR611897--[90]
XylarialesXylariales genera incertae sedis Circinotrichum sinense KY994106KY994107--[91]
XylarialesXylariales genera incertae sedis Gyrothrix eucalypti CPC 36066MN562109MN567617--[92]
XylarialesXylariales genera incertae sedis Gyrothrix inops BE108KC775746KC775721--[66]
XylarialesXylariales genera incertae sedis Gyrothrix oleae CPC 37069MN562136MN567643--[92]
XylarialesXylariales genera incertae sedis Gyrothrix ramosa MUCL54061KC775747KC775722--[66]
XylarialesXylariales genera incertae sedis Haploanthostomella elaeidis MFLU 20-0522MT929161MT929312MT928154-This study
XylarialesXylariales genera incertae sedis Neoanthostomella pseudostromatica MFLUCC 11-0610KU940158KU863146--[72]
XylarialesXylariales genera incertae sedis Neoanthostomella viticola MFLUCC 16-0243KX505957KX505958KX789496KX789495[89]
XylarialesXylariales genera incertae sedis Pseudoanthostomella conorum CBS 119333EU552099---[73]
XylarialesXylariales genera incertae sedis Pseudoanthostomella delitescens MFLUCC 16-0477 KX533451KX533452KX789491KX789490[89]
XylarialesXylariales genera incertae sedis Pseudoanthostomella pini-nigrae MFLUCC 16-0478KX533453KX533454KX789492-[89]
XylarialesXylariales genera incertae sedis Pseudoanthostomella sepelibilis AY908989AY875645--Unpublished
XylarialesXylariales genera incertae sedis Xenoanthostomella chromolaenae MFLUCC 17-1484MN638863MN638848--[3]
XylarialesZygosporiaceae Zygosporium oscheoides MFLUCC 14-0402MF621585MF621589--[93]
XylarialesZygosporiaceae Zygosporium minus HKAS99625MF621586MF621590--[93]

2.3. Phylogenetic Analyses

The consensus sequences were put through a BLAST search in the NCBI GenBank nucleotide database to search for the fungal sequences of closest relatives that have been deposited in the NCBI database. Dissanayake et al.’s study [19] was followed for the phylogenetic analyses. Voglmayr and Beenken’s study [79] was used as a reference of the dataset. Both individual and combined ITS, LSU, rpb2, and tub2 nucleotide sequences were analyzed. A total of 151 taxa were used for the phylogenetic analyses in order to find the taxonomic placement of each species. Three genera viz. Delonicicola, Furfurella (Delonicicolaceae), and Leptosillia (Leptosilliaceae) in Delonicicolales were used as the outgroup taxa. The MAFFT online program was used to obtain initial alignments for each locus [94]. Alignments were manually edited and single gene sequence data sets were combined using MEGA7 [95]. The Alignment Transformation Environment online program was used to convert the file format [96]. MrModeltest [97] was used to find the best model for maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian analyses (BYPP). The six simultaneous Markov chains were run for 20,000,000 generations and trees were sampled every 1000th generation. Bayesian posterior probabilities from MCMC were evaluated with a final average standard deviation of the split frequency of <0.01. Bootstrap values for ML equal to or greater than 50% and BYPP equal to or greater than 0.90 are given at the nodes (Figure 1). Fig Tree v1.4.0 was used to configure the phylogenetic trees [98] and edited using Microsoft Office PowerPoint 2010 and Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Adobe Systems Incorporated, 345 Park Avenue, San Jose, CA, USA).
Figure 1

Maximum likelihood majority rule consensus tree for the analyses of selected Xylariomycetidae isolates based on a dataset of combined ITS, LSU, rpb2, and tub2 nucleotide sequence. Bootstrap support values for maximum likelihood (ML) equal to or higher than 50% are given above each branch. Bayesian posterior probabilities (BYPP) equal to or greater than 0.90 are given at the nodes. Novel taxa are in blue bold and ex-type strains are in black bold. The tree is rooted to Delonicicolaceae and Leptosilliaceae (Delonicicolales). The asterisks represent unstable species.

3. Results

3.1. Morphology and Phylogeny

The combined dataset comprised 151 taxa from selected taxa in Amphisphaeriales, Delonicicolales, and Xylariales (Table 1). The RAxML analyses of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree (Figure 1) with a final ML optimization likelihood value of −126584.196783. The matrix had 4598 distinct alignment patterns, with 65.07% undetermined characters or gaps. Estimated base frequencies were: A = 0.243574, C = 0.257762, G = 0.258457, T = 0.240207; substitution rates AC = 1.296272, AG = 3.089851, AT = 1.400263, CG = 1.060328, CT = 9.900102, GT = 1.000000; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.443932. Tree-Length = 25.372161. Bayesian analysis resulted in a tree with similar topology and clades as the ML tree. Phylogenetic analyses of the combined ITS, LSU, rpb2, and tub2 loci show two novel taxa within the monospecific genus Haploanthostomella (type species Haploanthostomella elaeidis; Xylariales incertae sedis) and the novel taxa Endocalyx metroxyli, with the genus Endocalyx being placed in Cainiaceae.

3.1.1. Konta & K.D. Hyde. gen. nov.

Index Fungorum number: IF557876; Facesoffungi number: FoF09173 Etymology: “haplos” (απλός) in Greek means single; Anthostomella refers to its morphological similarity to Anthostomella. Saprobic on dead leaves and rachis in terrestrial habitats. Sexual morph: Ascomata immersed in the host epidermis, beneath a clypeus, visible as slightly raised blackened areas, dark brown to black, coriaceous, solitary or aggregated into clusters, scattered, with an ostiolar canal. Peridial wall thick, comprised of several layers of cells, outwardly comprising dark brown cells of textura prismatica and inwardly comprising hyaline cells of textura angularis. Paraphyses septate, tapering hyphae-like, hyaline. Asci eight-spored, unitunicate, clavate to cylindric, short pedicellate, with J-, apical ring. Ascospores uni–biseriate into the asci, unicellular, obovoid, fusoid, hyaline or brown to dark brown, verrucose with a mucilaginous cap at apex. Germ slit straight, less than spore-length. Asexual morph: Not observed. Type species: Haploanthostomella elaeidis Konta & K.D. Hyde. Notes: Anthostomella species were proven to be polyphyletic, and it is of no surprise that a new genus with anthostomella-like characteristics was discovered in this study [99]. Phylogenetic analyses based on a single dataset of ITS (supporting information section) and combined sequence data indicated that Haploanthostomella belongs to Xylariales genera incertae sedis, separating well from other genera but with low bootstrap values (Figure 1). According to the phylogenetic tree (Figure 1), seven genera (Ceratocladium, Circinotrichum, Gyrothrix, Idriella, Neoanthostomella, Virgaria and Xenoanthostomella) are closely related to our new genus, but morphological characteristics of these genera are different. The genera Neoanthostomella, Virgaria, and Xenoanthostomella were compared morphologically since they are similar to our new taxon. Haploanthostomella differs from Virgaria, Neoanthostomella, and Xenoanthostomella in having a J- apical ring, fusoid-obovoid ascospores, and verrucose with a mucilaginous cap at the apex, while Virgaria has asci with a J+ apical ring and smooth-walled elliposidal ascospores lacking of a mucilaginous sheath; Neoanthostomella smooth-walled elliposidal ascospores surrounded by a thick mucilaginous sheath; Xenoanthostomella has unilocular ascoma, and ascospores lacking germ slits and mucilaginous sheaths [13,72,89]. Therefore, Haploanthostomella is described here as a new genus based on phylogeny coupled with morphology. In addition, we provide a key to genera with Anthostomella-like characteristics.

3.1.2. Konta & K.D. Hyde., sp. nov.

Index Fungorum number: IF557877, Facesoffungi number: FoF09174 (Figure 2)
Figure 2

Haploanthostomella elaeidis (MFLU 20-0522, holotype). (A) Substrate. (B,C) Appearance of ascomata on the host surface. (D) Sections of ascomata. (E) Peridium. (F) Hamathecium. (G) Septa of paraphyses show in red arrows. (H,I–K) Asci. (L) J- apical ring in Melzer’s reagent. (M,N,P–R) Ascospores with mucilaginous cap (red arrows in M, Q, R) and germ slit (red arrows in P). (O) An ascospore with verrucose wall. Scale bars: B = 1000 μm, C = 200 μm, D = 500 μm, E, G, L = 20 μm, F, H–K = 50 μm, M–P = 10 μm, Q–R = 5 μm.

Etymology: Referring to the genus of palm trees Elaeis Jacq. Holotype: MFLU 20-0522. Saprobic on dead leaves and rachis of Elaeis guineensis. Sexual morph: Ascomata 160–280 × 130–350 μm (x¯ = 220 × 240 μm, n = 20), immersed in the host epidermis, beneath a clypeus, visible as slightly raised blackened areas, dark brown to black, coriaceous, solitary or aggregated into clusters, scattered, with an ostiolar canal. Peridial wall 13–45 μm wide, thick, comprising several layers of cells, outwardly comprising dark brown cells of textura irregularis and inwardly comprising hyaline cells of textura prismatica, 7–20 μm wide. Paraphyses 1.5–4.5 μm wide, septate, hyphae-like, hyaline. Asci 50–90 × 10–15 μm (x¯ = 70 × 12 μm, n = 40), 8-spored, unitunicate, clavate to cylindric, short pedicellate, with J- apical ring. Ascospores 10–18 × 5–8 μm (x¯ = 14 × 6 μm, n = 100), uni–biseriate into the asci, unicellular, obovoid, fusoid, hyaline to light brown when immature and brown to dark brown when mature, mostly one, rarely two-guttulate, cell wall verrucose, with a mucilaginous cap at the apex. Germslit 3–6 μm length (x¯ = 5 μm, n = 50), straight, less than spore-length. Asexual morph: Not observed. Material examined: THAILAND, Surat Thani Province, on dead leaves and rachis of Elaeis guineensis Jacq. (Arecaceae) on the ground, 21 July 2017, Sirinapa Konta, SRWD12 (MFLU 20-0522, holotype). Notes: A BLAST search of H. elaeidis ITS sequence shows 83.87% similarity with Gyrothrix oleae (CPC 37069); LSU sequence shows 95.95% similarity with Gyrothrix eucalypti (CPC 36066); and rpb2 sequence shows 80.95% similarity with Lopadostoma meridionale (LG). Only the sexual morph of H. elaeidis was found in nature, and we could not obtain a pure culture from fresh samples. Therefore, the morphological characteristics of H. elaeidis were not compared with Ceratocladium, Circinotrichum, Gyrothrix, and Idriella, as they only had asexual morphs found in nature. Hence, the morphological features of H. elaeidis were only compared with Neoanthostomella, Virgaria, and Xenoanthostomella, as they have sexual morphs.

3.1.3. Berk. & Broome, J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 15(1): 84 (1876) [1877]

Index Fungorum number: IF8158; Facesoffungi number: FoF09175 Saprobic on various plants. Colonies on host plant, pustules nearly flat or raised, circular, discolored, dark brown to black, at last bursting, the conidiomata developing. Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Conidiomata scattered, erect, cupulate to cylindrical; peridial hyphae enclosing the inner conidial mass, nonsporiferous, brown to yellowish brown; some species consisting of two parts of conidioma: (1) a basal cylinder covering a central column, rough-walled, carbonaceous, composed of black hyphae which are sometimes branched and are adherent to one another; (2) a slender central column, synnematous, expanding radially apically, high, enclosed by the peridial hyphae which are nonsporiferous, orange-yellow to lemon-yellow. Peridial wall thick, comprising dark brown, thick-walled cells of textura angularis. Conidiophores thread-like, septate, with or without short pegs bearing the conidia, meristematic at the base, colorless basally and gradually turning brown apically, 1–2 µm wide; peridium thick, comprising dark brown, thick-walled cells of textura angularis. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, integrated, determinate. Conidia solitary, unicellular, flattened, round, oval or slightly polygonal in face view, at first pale, dark brown to fuscous black at maturity, with or without guttules, often with a longitudinal hyaline straight germ slit extending the full-length (adapted from [99,100,101]). Type species: Endocalyx thwaitesii Berk. & Broome Notes: Endocalyx is a coelomycetous genus in Cainiaceae with E. cinctus collected from Japan E. metroxyli sp. nov. collected from Thailand. Phylogenetic analyses of a single dataset of ITS (supporting information section) and phylogenetic analyses of a combined dataset of ITS, LSU, rpb2, and tub2 regions (Figure 1) confirm the placement of Endocalyx within Cainiaceae. ITS analyses showed that Endocalyx is closely related to Amphibambusa and Atrotorquata (supporting information section), while Figure 1 shows that Endocalyx formed a basal clade to other cainiaceous genera (Alishanica, Amphibambusa, Arecophila, Atrotorquata, Cainia, Longiappendispora, and Seynesia) with high bootstrap support. Morphologically, Endocalyx has been revised and described only as an asexual morph of the genus [100,101], while all genera in Cainiaceae have been described in their sexual morphs, except the type genus Cainia, for which both asexual and sexual morphs have been described. We could not compare the morphology of Endocalyx to Arecophila, Seynesia, and Amphibambusa (sister species in Figure 1). Therefore, Cainia was used for morphological comparisons; Endocalyx differs from Cainia in having erect conidiomata and also the ostiole opening surrounded by yellow hyphae, ellipsoid-globose conidia, unicellular with brown to dark brown color, and a germ slit. Cainia has immersed conidiomata, conidiogenous cells with one to three phialides, and elongate fusiform conidia, unicellular or septate, hyaline, with pointed ends [100,101,102]. Recently, Longiappendispora was introduced under Cainiaceae, with seven genera in total included in the family by Mapook et al. [11]. In our study, detailed molecular analyses were done for Endocalyx and its placement in Cainiaceae (Xyalriales) was confirmed. Previously, Endocalyx was classified in Apiosporaceae (Xylariales, Sordariomycetes) based on morphological evidence. As the first detailed molecular data of Endocalyx cinctus have been made available from a Japan laboratory [32], their current placement is supported (Figure 1). However, there are no recent publications referring to the molecular data of this genus yet. Thus, in this study, we present the placement of Endocalyx based on multigene phylogenetic analyses with recent sequence data from the Japan collection as well as the Thailand collection. In addition, we accept eight genera in Cainiaceae (Alishanica, Amphibambusa, Arecophila, Atrotorquata, Cainia, Endocalyx, Longiappendispora, and Seynesia), and seven species by including our new species in the genus Endocalyx (Table 2). In addition, we provide a key for the members of Cainiaceae.
Table 2

Host and locality information of Endocalyx reported worldwide based on the records of Species Fungorum 2021.

No.SpeciesHostCountryReference
EudicotsMonocots
1 Endocalyx amarkantakensis Shorea robusta (Dipterocarpaceae) India (Holotype)[103]
2E. cinctus * Livistona chinensis var. boninensis (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Japan[104]
Oncosperma fasciculatum (Arecaceae; clustering, rarely solitary palm)Japan[101]
Oncosperma sp. (Arecaceae; clustering, rarely solitary palm)Sri Lanka (Holotype)[100]
Phoenix canariensis (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Japan[101]
Phoenix hanceana (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Hong Kong[105]
Trachycarpus fortunei (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Japan[101]
3 E. collantesis Smilax sp. (Smilacaceae)Cuba (Holotype)[106]
4 E. indicus twigs of woody India (Holotype)[107]
5 E. indumentum Livistona chinensis var. boninensis (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Japan (Holotype)[101,104]
Phoenix canariensis (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Japan[104]
6 E. melanoxanthus Acrocomia mexicana (Arecaceae)Mexico[108]
Archontophoenix alexandrae (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Australia[109]
Hong Kong[105,109]
Malaysia[109]
Singapore[109]
ArecaceaeMexico[108]
Arenga engleri (Arecaceae; clustering palm)Hong Kong[105]
Japan[104]
Dypsis lutescens (=Chrysalidocarpus lutescens) (Arecaceae; clustering palm)Japan[104]
Caryota urens (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Sri Lanka (Holotype)[100]
Cocos nucifera (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Australia[109]
Ghana[110]
Hawaii[111,112]
Japan[104]
Malaysia[109,113]
Papua New Guinea[114]
Seychelles[109]
Singapore[109]
Coffea arabica (Rubiaceae) Venezuela[115]
Dracaena fragrans (Asparagaceae)Cuba[116]
Venezuela[115]
Elaeis guineensis (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Ghana[110]
Myanmar[117]
Sierra Leone[113]
Elaeis sp. (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Japan[104]
Licuala longicalycata (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Thailand[118]
Livistona chinensis (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Hong Kong[105]
Livistona chinensis var. boninensis (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Japan[104]
Livistona rotundifolia (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Taiwan[119]
Livistona speciosa (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Myanmar[117]
Nannorrhops ritchieana (Arecaceae; clustering palm)Pakistan[120]
Phoenix canariensis (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Japan[104]
Phoenix hanceana (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Hong Kong[105,121]
Phoenix reclinata (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Ghana[110]
Phoenix roebelenii (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Japan[104]
Phoenix roebelenii-senegalensis (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Japan[104]
Ravenala madagascariensis (Strelitziaceae)Japan[104]
Taiwan[119]
Ripogonum scandens (Ripogonaceae)New Zealand[122]
Roystonea borinquena (Arecaceae; solitary palm)USA (Florida)[123]
Roystonea regia (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Cuba[124,125,126,127]
Sabal palmetto (Arecaceae; solitary palm)USA (Florida)[128]
Serenoa serrulata (Arecaceae; clustering and solitary palm)USA (Florida)[129]
Smilax sp. (Smilacaceae)USA (Florida)[128]
Trachycarpus fortunei (Arecaceae; solitary palm)China[109]
unknown, palmAustralia[109]
China[109]
Hong Kong[109]
Malaysia[109]
Seychelles[109]
Singapore[109]
Wodyetia bifurcata (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Florida[123]
E. melanoxanthus(=E. melanoxanthus var. grossus) Trachycarpus fortunei (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Japan[101]
E. melanoxanthus(=E. melanoxanthus var. melanoxanthus) Acrocomia intumescens (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Brazil[102]
Butia yatay (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Argentina[130]
Cocos nucifera (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Ghana[101]
Euterpe edulis (Arecaceae; solitary, or rarely clustering palm (growing in dense tufts or clumps) and then with few stems)Argentina[130]
Brazil[102]
Euterpe oleracea (Arecaceae; clustering palm)Brazil[102]
Livistona chinensis var. boninensis (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Japan[101]
Livistona chinensis var. subglobosa (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Japan[101]
Phoenix canariensis (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Japan[101]
Phoenix roebelenii (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Japan[101]
Satakentia liukiuensis (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Japan[101]
Syagrus coronata (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Brazil[131]
Syagrus romanzoffiana (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Argentina[130]
Trachycarpus fortunei (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Japan[101]
Washingtonia robusta (Arecaceae; solitary palm)Japan[101]
7E. thwaitesii (Type species)Cissus oreophila (Vitaceae) Ghana[132]
Cissus sp. (Vitaceae) Ghana[133]
Sri Lanka[133]
Oncosperma sp. (Arecaceae; clustering, rarely solitary palm)Ghana[133]
Sri Lanka (Holotype)[133]

* Have molecular data.

3.1.4. Konta & K.D. Hyde. sp. nov.

Index Fungorum number: IF558116, Facesoffungi number: FoF09176 (Figure 3)
Figure 3

Endocalyx metroxyli (MFLU 15-1454, holotype). (A) Forest in Krabi Province. (B) Palm samples. (C–E) Appearance of conidiomata on host. (F) Vertical cut of a conidioma. (G–H) Vertical section of a conidioma. (I) Section of peridium. (J) Group of conidia. (K) Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cell with conidium. (L–S) Conidia (P–R, Conidia with conidiogenous cells). (T) Germ slit (red arrow). (U) Germinated conidia. (V) Colonies on MEA media. Scale bars: B = 2 cm, C = 500 μm, D–H = 200 μm, I, J = 20 μm, L–T = 5 μm, U = 10 μm.

Etymology: Refers to the name of the host genus, Metroxylon. Holotype: MFLU 15-1454. Saprobic on dead petiole of Metroxylon sagu. Colonies on host plant, pustules. Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Conidiomata 340–660 μm wide, in vertical section 495–820 × 325–485 µm, acervulus, solitary, semi-immersed to immersed in the host epidermis, beneath a clypeus, visible as slightly raised and blackened, black, carbonaceous, fragile, with an ostiolar canal. Ostiolar opening surrounded by a yellow margin. Peridial wall 34–80 μm wide, thick, comprising dark brown cells of textura angularis. Conidiomata not observed with a basal cylinder covering a central column or a slender central column in our collection. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cell, hyaline to pale-brown, unbranched, smooth. Conidia 13–16 × 7–10 µm (x¯ = 13 × 10 µm, n = 30), unicellular, ellipsoid-globose, brown to dark brown, with short pegs bearing conidia, with germ slit, smooth-walled. Culture characteristics: Colonies on MEA, at first white, raised, effuse, velvety to hairy, circular, smooth at the margin, white from above, pale-brown from below. Material examined: Thailand, Krabi Province, on dead petiole of Metroxylon sagu Rottb. on the ground (Arecaceae), 8 December 2014, Sirinapa Konta KBR04h2 (MFLU 15-1454, holotype); ex-type living culture, MFLUCC 15-0723A; ibid. MFLUCC 15-0723B, MFLUCC 15-0723C. Additional sequence data: SSU: MT929310, MT929311, tef1-α: MT928152, MT928153. Notes: Endocalyx metroxyli is phylogenetically well supported and is placed in Cainiaceae (Figure 1). Endocalyx metroxyli is closely related to E. cinctus with high bootstrap support but is distinct in morphological characteristics. A BLAST search of E. metroxyli ITS sequence shows 83.10% similarity with Requienella seminuda (CBS 140502) (CPC 37069), LSU sequence shows 96.14% similarity with Entosordaria quercina (RQ), tub2 sequence shows 88.94% similarity with Daldinia dennisii var. dennisii, SSU sequence shows 97.92% similarity with Xenoanthostomella chromolaenae (MFLUCC 17-1484), and tef1-α sequence shows 89.39% similarity with Barrmaelia macrospor (BM). Endocalyx metroxyli is morphologically similar to E. melanoxanthus. However, Endocalyx metroxyli does not have erect conidiomata developing from the pustules, as was mentioned by Petch [100], Okada and Tubaki [101], and Vitoria et al. [102,131]. In this study, we found only a black raised pustule structure with ostiole surrounded by a yellow hyphae ring, and hyaline conidiophore, unicellular, dark brown conidia with a longitudinal germ slit. Endocalyx melanoxanthus was collected and described from palm hosts (Arecaceae), and a few collections were collected from other host plants (Table 2). According to Species Fungorum [134], E. melanoxanthus var. Grossus (G. Okada & Tubaki) and E. melanoxanthus var. melanoxanthus (Berk. & Broome) are considered as E. melanoxanthus, even though they have several different characteristics. Endocalyx metroxyli is morphologically similar to E. melanoxanthus var. melanoxanthus, in having black raised pustules surrounded by yellow hyphae and smooth-walled conidia with no significant size differences [100,101,102]. However, our new taxon lacks cupulate or cylindrical conidiomata [101,102]. On the other hand, E. metroxyli differs from E. melanoxanthus var. grossus by lacking the production of ornamented conidia [100,101].

4. Discussion

Based on phylogeny and morphological characteristics, the new monotypic genus Haploanthostomella (type species: Haploanthostomella elaeidis) and the new species Endocalyx metroxyli have been established. The former new species was isolated from a dead rachis of Elaeis guineensis, and the latter from a dead petiole of Metroxylon sagu (Arecaceae) in Thailand. Phylogenetic analyses of combined datasets together with morphological characteristics revealed that Haploanthostomella belongs to Xylariales incertae sedis, while Endocalyx belongs to the Cainiaceae (Xylariales). Based on morphological features, Endocalyx was assigned to Apiosporaceae (Amphisphaeriales, Sordariomycetes), together with four other genera, viz. Appendicospora, Arthrinium, Dictyoarthrinium, and Nigrospora [3,8]. Later, Dictyoarthrinium was transferred to Didymosphaeriaceae (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes) [135]. According to our phylogenetic analyses (Figure 1), Arthrinium and Nigrospora should be accepted under the Apiosporaceae, while Appendicospora did not clade to this family (supporting information section), and Endocalyx fits well within the Cainiaceae. Interestingly, four out of seven species in the genus Endocalyx (E. melanoxanthus, E. cinctus, E. indumentum, and E. thwaitesii) were collected from palm hosts (Table 2). Endocalyx metroxyli is similar to other species by having dark brown conidia with a full-length germ slit, it but differs from other species by not having conidiomata produced from the pustulate and no thread-like structure of conidiophores. Morphological characteristics of species in the genus are mostly flat or raised pustules, capsule or slender conidiomata with or without branches at the apex, and brown to dark brown conidia with smooth walls (E. amarkantakensis, E. collantesis, E. indumentum, E. melanoxanthus, E. melanoxanthus var. melanoxanthus), while some species are verrucose-walled (E. cinctus, E. indumentum, E. melanoxanthus var. grossus, E. thwaitesii). We referred to previous publications for morphological comparisons to the taxa in this study, as we did not observe all holotype specimens [100,101,102]. According to the literature, there are also strains derived from another two species and two varieties. Excluding E. cinctus, no sequence data are available for generic types of Endocalyx and other species, and their morphology and host substrates are closely related to our novel taxon. Endocalyx species have been reported in several countries, especially in tropical and subtropical regions. Furthermore, palm trees (Arecaceae) have most commonly been reported as the host, while several species have been presented from other hosts (Table 2). The phylogenetic placement of many groups within the Xylariales remains unclear (e.g., Anthostomelloides, Calceomyces, Circinotrichum, Fasciatispora (only F. petrakii), Gyrothyrix, Melanographium, Neoanthostomella, Pseudoanthostomella, and Xenoanthostomella, Figure 1). Thus, it is necessary to collect and analyze more fungal specimens from Xylariales using multigene phylogeny (with protein coding genes) and morphology to resolve their taxonomical placement and delimitation.
  38 in total

1.  A five-gene phylogeny of Pezizomycotina.

Authors:  Joseph W Spatafora; Gi-Ho Sung; Desiree Johnson; Cedar Hesse; Benjamin O'Rourke; Maryna Serdani; Robert Spotts; François Lutzoni; Valérie Hofstetter; Jolanta Miadlikowska; Valérie Reeb; Cécile Gueidan; Emily Fraker; Thorsten Lumbsch; Robert Lücking; Imke Schmitt; Kentaro Hosaka; André Aptroot; Claude Roux; Andrew N Miller; David M Geiser; Josef Hafellner; Geir Hestmark; A Elizabeth Arnold; Burkhard Büdel; Alexandra Rauhut; David Hewitt; Wendy A Untereiner; Mariette S Cole; Christoph Scheidegger; Matthias Schultz; Harrie Sipman; Conrad L Schoch
Journal:  Mycologia       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.696

2.  New and Interesting Fungi. 2.

Authors:  P W Crous; R K Schumacher; A Akulov; R Thangavel; M Hernández-Restrepo; A J Carnegie; R Cheewangkoon; M J Wingfield; B A Summerell; W Quaedvlieg; T A Coutinho; J Roux; A R Wood; A Giraldo; J Z Groenewald
Journal:  Fungal Syst Evol       Date:  2019-02-05

3.  Molecular phylogenetic studies on the Diatrypaceae based on rDNA-ITS sequences.

Authors:  Francisco Javier Acero; Vicente González; Javier Sánchez-Ballesteros; Víctor Rubio; Julia Checa; Gerald F Bills; Oscar Salazar; Gonzalo Platas; Fernando Peláez
Journal:  Mycologia       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.696

4.  Resolution of morphology-based taxonomic delusions: Acrocordiella, Basiseptospora, Blogiascospora, Clypeosphaeria, Hymenopleella, Lepteutypa, Pseudapiospora, Requienella, Seiridium and Strickeria.

Authors:  W M Jaklitsch; A Gardiennet; H Voglmayr
Journal:  Persoonia       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 11.051

5.  Phylogenetic reassessment of Nigrospora: Ubiquitous endophytes, plant and human pathogens.

Authors:  M Wang; F Liu; P W Crous; L Cai
Journal:  Persoonia       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 11.051

6.  Large-scale generation and analysis of filamentous fungal DNA barcodes boosts coverage for kingdom fungi and reveals thresholds for fungal species and higher taxon delimitation.

Authors:  D Vu; M Groenewald; M de Vries; T Gehrmann; B Stielow; U Eberhardt; A Al-Hatmi; J Z Groenewald; G Cardinali; J Houbraken; T Boekhout; P W Crous; V Robert; G J M Verkley
Journal:  Stud Mycol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 16.097

7.  Lichens or endophytes? The enigmatic genus Leptosillia in the Leptosilliaceae fam. nov. (Xylariales), and Furfurella gen. nov. (Delonicicolaceae).

Authors:  H Voglmayr; M B Aguirre-Hudson; H G Wagner; S Tello; W M Jaklitsch
Journal:  Persoonia       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 11.051

8.  Linosporopsis, a new leaf-inhabiting scolecosporous genus in Xylariaceae.

Authors:  Hermann Voglmayr; Ludwig Beenken
Journal:  Mycol Prog       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 2.847

9.  Theissenia reconsidered, including molecular phylogeny of the type species T. pyrenocrata and a new genus Durotheca (Xylariaceae, Ascomycota).

Authors:  Thomas Læssøe; Prasert Srikitikulchai; J Jennifer D Luangsa-Ard; Marc Stadler
Journal:  IMA Fungus       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.515

10.  A phylogenetic re-evaluation of Arthrinium.

Authors:  Pedro W Crous; Johannes Z Groenewald
Journal:  IMA Fungus       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.515

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.