| Literature DB >> 30917546 |
Eline H van den Berg1,2, Jose L Flores-Guerrero3, Eke G Gruppen4, Martin H de Borst5, Justyna Wolak-Dinsmore6, Margery A Connelly7, Stephan J L Bakker8, Robin P F Dullaart9.
Abstract
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is likely to be associated with elevated plasma branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) and may precede the development of type 2 diabetes (T2D). We hypothesized that BCAAs may be involved in the pathogenesis of T2D attributable to NAFLD and determined the extent to which plasma BCAAs influence T2D development in NAFLD. We evaluated cross-sectional associations of NAFLD with fasting plasma BCAAs (nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy), and prospectively determined the extent to which the influence of NAFLD on incident T2D is attributable to BCAA elevations. In the current study, 5791 Prevention of REnal and Vascular ENd-stage Disease (PREVEND) cohort participants without T2D at baseline were included. Elevated fatty liver index (FLI) ≥60, an algorithm based on triglycerides, gamma-glutamyltransferase, body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference, was used as proxy of NAFLD. Elevated FLI ≥ 60 was present in 1671 (28.9%) participants. Cross-sectionally, BCAAs were positively associated with FLI ≥ 60 (β = 0.208, p < 0.001). During a median follow-up of 7.3 years, 276 participants developed T2D, of which 194 (70.2%) had an FLI ≥ 60 (log-rank test, p < 0.001). Cox regression analyses revealed that both FLI ≥60 (hazard ratio (HR) 3.46, 95% CI 2.45⁻4.87, p < 0.001) and higher BCAA levels (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.03⁻1.37, p = 0.01) were positively associated with incident T2D. Mediation analysis showed that the association of FLI with incident T2D was in part attributable to elevated BCAAs (proportion mediated 19.6%). In conclusion, both elevated FLI and elevated plasma BCAA levels are associated with risk of incident T2D. The association of NAFLD with T2D development seems partly mediated by elevated BCAAs.Entities:
Keywords: branched-chain amino acids; fatty liver index; insulin resistance; non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; type 2 diabetes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30917546 PMCID: PMC6471562 DOI: 10.3390/nu11030705
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Clinical and laboratory characteristics including plasma branched-chain amino acids in 4120 subjects with a fatty liver index (FLI) < 60 and 1671 subjects with an FLI ≥60.
| FLI < 60, | FLI ≥ 60, | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years), median (IQR) | 49.6 (41.9–59.3) | 56.0 (47.7–65.6) | <0.001 |
| Sex (men/women), | 1707 (41.4)/2413 (58.6) | 1133 (67.8)/538 (32.2) | <0.001 |
| MetS, | 296 (7.2) | 946 (56.6) | <0.001 |
| History of cardiovascular disease, | 169 (4.1) | 155 (9.3) | <0.001 |
| Parental history of T2D, | 577 (14.0) | 266 (15.9) | 0.061 |
| Current smokers, | 1167 (28.3) | 457 (27.3) | 0.454 |
| Alcohol ≥10 g/day, | 137 (3.4) | 109 (6.6) | <0.001 |
| Antihypertensive medication, | 560 (13.6) | 556 (33.3) | <0.001 |
| Lipid-lowering drugs, | 249 (6.0) | 234 (14.0) | <0.001 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg), mean ± SD | 121 ± 17 | 134 ± 18 | <0.001 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg), mean ± SD | 71 ± 8 | 77 ± 9 | <0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD | 24.7 ± 2.8 | 30.8 ± 4.0 | <0.001 |
| Waist circumference, mean ± SD | 85.8 ± 9.1 | 104.8 ± 8.9 | <0.001 |
| Waist/hip ratio, mean ± SD | 0.87 ± 0.07 | 0.96 ± 0.07 | <0.001 |
| Glucose (mmol/L), mean ± SD | 4.71 ± 0.58 | 5.10 ± 0.67 | <0.001 |
| Insulin (mU/L), median (IQR) | 6.80 (5.1–9.2) | 12.50 (9.2–18.1) | <0.001 |
| HOMA-IR (mU mmol/L2/22.5), median (IQR) | 1.42 (1.04–1.98) | 2.86 (2.00–4.17) | <0.001 |
| HOMA-β (%), median (IQR) | 25.55 (18.61–35.31) | 46.92 (33.29–66.68) | <0.001 |
| hsCRP (mg/L), median (IQR) | 1.00 (0.48–2.26) | 2.35 (1.17–4.25) | <0.001 |
| ALT (U/L), median (IQR) | 15 (12–20) | 23 (17–32) | <0.001 |
| AST (U/L), median (IQR) | 21 (19–25) | 25 (21–29) | <0.001 |
| ALP (U/L), mean ± SD | 63 ± 19 | 72 ± 22 | <0.001 |
| GGT (U/L), median (IQR) | 19 (13–27) | 39 (27–60) | <0.001 |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2), median (IQR) | 95.9 (84.2–105.7) | 88.4 (76.4–99.4) | <0.001 |
| UAE (mg/24 h), median (IQR) | 7.4 (5.6–11.0) | 9.7 (6.6–17.3) | <0.001 |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L), mean ± SD | 5.31 ± 1.00 | 5.71 ± 1.03 | <0.001 |
| Non-HDL cholesterol (mmol/L), mean ± SD | 3.96 ± 0.98 | 4.60 ± 1.00 | <0.001 |
| LDL cholesterol (mmol/L), mean ± SD | 3.49 ± 0.90 | 3.79 ± 0.92 | <0.001 |
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/L), mean ± SD | 1.35 ± 0.30 | 1.11 ± 0.24 | <0.001 |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L), median (IQR) | 0.94 (0.71–1.26) | 1.66 (1.26–2.19) | <0.001 |
| Total BCAAs (µM), mean ± SD | 356.90 ± 62.58 | 425.48 ± 67.78 | <0.001 |
| Valine (µM), mean ± SD | 197.22 ± 33.20 | 229.74 ± 35.48 | <0.001 |
| Leucine (µM), mean ± SD | 119.78 ± 23.64 | 144.48 ± 27.63 | <0.001 |
| Isoleucine (µM), mean ± SD | 39.74 ± 13.47 | 51.19 ± 15.99 | <0.001 |
Data are given in number with percentages (%), mean ± standard deviation (SD) for normally distributed data or median with interquartile ranges (IQR) for non-normally distributed data. Abbreviations: ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BCAA, branched-chain amino acids; BMI, body mass index; FLI, fatty liver index; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; GGT, gamma-glutamyltransferase; HOMA, Homeostasis Model Assessment; HDL, high-density lipoproteins; hsCRP, high sensitivity C-reactive protein; IR, insulin resistance; LDL, low-density lipoproteins; MetS, metabolic syndrome; T2D, type 2 diabetes; UAE, urinary albumin excretion. LDL cholesterol was calculated by the Friedewald formula.
Multivariable linear regression analysis demonstrating the positive association of plasma branched-chain amino acids with an elevated fatty liver index (FLI) (≥60) after adjustment for clinical and laboratory covariates in 5791 subjects.
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β |
| β |
| β |
| β |
| β |
| |
| Age | 0.015 | 0.173 | 0.014 | 0.199 | 0.010 | 0.339 | −0.032 | 0.035 | −0.046 | 0.002 |
| Sex (men vs. women) | 0.424 | <0.001 | 0.426 | <0.001 | 0.426 | <0.001 | 0.431 | <0.001 | 0.431 | <0.001 |
| FLI ≥60 vs. <60 | 0.326 | <0.001 | 0.324 | <0.001 | 0.323 | <0.001 | 0.318 | <0.001 | 0.208 | <0.001 |
| Family history of T2D (yes/no) | 0.045 | <0.001 | 0.048 | <0.001 | 0.046 | <0.001 | 0.033 | 0.002 | ||
| Alcohol intake (≥10 g/day) | 0.007 | 0.495 | 0.011 | 0.325 | 0.014 | 0.207 | ||||
| Current smoking (yes/no) | −0.043 | <0.001 | −0.044 | <0.001 | −0.030 | 0.005 | ||||
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | −0.057 | <0.001 | −0.046 | 0.002 | ||||||
| UAE (mg/24 h) | −0.015 | 0.165 | −0.021 | 0.058 | ||||||
| Use of antihypertensive medication | 0.009 | 0.478 | −0.011 | 0.376 | ||||||
| Use of lipid-lowering drugs | 0.026 | 0.026 | 0.010 | 0.395 | ||||||
| HOMA-IR | 0.271 | <0.001 | ||||||||
| HOMA-β | −0.043 | 0.089 | ||||||||
β: standardized regression coefficients. HOMA-IR and HOMA-β were loge transformed for analyses. eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FLI, fatty liver index; HOMA, Homeostasis Model Assessment; IR, insulin resistance; T2D, type 2 diabetes; UAE; urinary albumin excretion. Model 1: adjusted for age and sex. Model 2: adjusted for age, sex, family history of type 2 diabetes. Model 3: adjusted for age, sex, family history of type 2 diabetes, alcohol intake and current smoking. Model 4: adjusted for age, sex, family history of type 2 diabetes, alcohol intake, current smoking, estimated glomerular filtration rate, urinary albumin excretion and use of antihypertensive medication and lipid-lowering drugs. Model 5: adjusted for age, sex, family history of type 2 diabetes, alcohol intake, current smoking, estimated glomerular filtration rate, urinary albumin excretion, use of antihypertensive medication and lipid-lowering drugs, HOMA-IR and HOMA-β.
Prospective associations of FLI with incident type 2 diabetes.
|
|
| ||
| Participants, | 4120 | 1671 | |
| Incident T2D, | 82 (2.0) | 194 (11.6) | |
|
|
| ||
| Crude Model | (ref) | 6.78 (5.23–8.79) | <0.001 |
| Model 1 | (ref) | 5.84 (4.46–7.66) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | (ref) | 5.72 (4.37–7.50) | <0.001 |
| Model 3 | (ref) | 5.64 (4.31–7.39) | <0.001 |
| Model 4 | (ref) | 5.09 (3.77–6.88) | <0.001 |
| Model 5 | (ref) | 3.84 (2.76–5.36) | <0.001 |
| Model 6 | (ref) | 3.46 (2.45–4.87) | <0.001 |
Data are presented as hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). FLI, fatty liver index; BCAA, branched-chain amino acids; T2D, type 2 diabetes. Model 1: adjusted for age and sex. Model 2: adjusted for age, sex and family history of type 2 diabetes. Model 3: adjusted for age, sex, family history of type 2 diabetes, alcohol intake and current smoking. Model 4: adjusted for age, sex, family history of type 2 diabetes, alcohol intake, current smoking, eGFR, UAE, antihypertensive medication and lipid-lowering drugs. Model 5: adjusted for age, sex, family history of type 2 diabetes, alcohol intake, current smoking, eGFR, UAE, antihypertensive medication, lipid-lowering drugs, HOMA-IR and HOMA-β. Model 6: adjusted for age, sex, family history of type 2 diabetes, alcohol intake, current smoking, eGFR, UAE, antihypertensive medication, lipid-lowering drugs, HOMA-IR, HOMA-β and BCAAs.
Figure 1Kaplan–Meier curves for incident type 2 diabetes survival according to FLI score. Log-rank test (p < 0.001). FLI, fatty liver index.
Prospective associations of plasma total branched chain amino acids with incident type 2 diabetes.
| BCAA Per 1 SD Increment | ||
|---|---|---|
| Participants, | 5791 | |
| Incident T2D, | 276 (4.8) | |
| HR (95% CI) | ||
| Crude Model | 1.68 (1.57–1.81) | <0.001 |
| Model 1 | 1.65 (1.52–1.79) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.63 (1.50–1.77) | <0.001 |
| Model 3 | 1.64 (1.50–1.79) | <0.001 |
| Model 4 | 1.64 (1.49–1.81) | <0.001 |
| Model 5 | 1.35 (1.20–1.53) | <0.001 |
| Model 6 | 1.19 (1.03–1.37) | 0.01 |
Data are presented as hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). FLI, fatty liver index; BCAA, branched-chain amino acids; T2D, type 2 diabetes. Model 1: adjusted for age and sex. Model 2: adjusted for age, sex and family history of type 2 diabetes. Model 3: adjusted for age, sex, family history of type 2 diabetes, alcohol intake and current smoking. Model 4: adjusted for age, sex, family history of type 2 diabetes, alcohol intake, current smoking, eGFR, UAE, antihypertensive medication and lipid-lowering drugs. Model 5: adjusted for age, sex, family history of type 2 diabetes, alcohol intake, current smoking, eGFR, UAE, antihypertensive medication, lipid-lowering drugs, HOMA-IR and HOMA-β. Model 6: adjusted for age, sex, family history of type 2 diabetes, alcohol intake, current smoking, eGFR, UAE, antihypertensive medication, lipid-lowering drugs, HOMA-IR, HOMA-β and FLI elevated (yes/no).
Figure 2Mediation analysis on the association of FLI with incident type 2 diabetes. (a)–(c) are the regression coefficients between variables. The indirect effect is calculated as a × b. Total effect (c) is a × b + c’. Magnitude of mediation is calculated as indirect effect divided by total effect.
Mediating effect of BCAAs on the association of FLI with incident type 2 diabetes.
| Coefficient (95% CI) * | Proportion Mediated | |
|---|---|---|
| Indirect pathway (ab path) | B = 0.040 (95% CI 0.027–0.054) | 19.6% ** |
| Total effect (ab + c’ path) | B = 0.204 (95% CI 0.174–0.232) |
Analyses were performed according to Preacher and Hayes Procedure. B: unstandardized regression coefficient. Coefficients are adjusted for age and sex. * 95% CIs were bias-corrected confidence intervals after running 2000 bootstrap samples. ** The size of the significant mediated effect is calculated as the standardized indirect effect divided by the standardized total effect multiplied by 100.
Figure 3Mediation analysis on the association of HSI with incident type 2 diabetes. (a)–(c) are the regression coefficients between variables. The indirect effect is calculated as a × b. Total effect (c) is a × b + c’. Magnitude of mediation is calculated as indirect effect divided by total effect.
Mediating effect of BCAAs on the association of HSI with incident type 2 diabetes.
| Coefficient (95% CI) * | Proportion Mediated | |
|---|---|---|
| Indirect pathway (ab path) | B = 0.033 (95% CI 0.026–0.041) | 22.6% ** |
| Total effect (ab + c’ path) | B = 0.146 (95% CI 0.115–0.176) |
Analyses were performed according to Preacher and Hayes Procedure. B: unstandardized regression coefficient. Coefficients are adjusted for age and sex. * 95% CIs were bias-corrected confidence intervals after running 2000 bootstrap samples. ** The size of the significant mediated effect is calculated as the standardized indirect effect divided by the standardized total effect multiplied by 100.