Literature DB >> 35636708

A high-density theta burst paradigm enhances the aftereffects of transcranial magnetic stimulation: Evidence from focal stimulation of rat motor cortex.

Qinglei Meng1, Hieu Nguyen1, Antonia Vrana1, Simone Baldwin1, Charlotte Qiong Li1, Antonia Giles1, Jun Wang2, Yihong Yang3, Hanbing Lu4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Theta burst stimulation (TBS) is an efficient noninvasive neuromodulation paradigm that has been widely adopted, clinically. However, the efficacy of TBS treatment remains similarly modest as conventional 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: To develop a new TBS paradigm that enhances the effects of TMS administration while maintaining high time-efficiency.
METHODS: We describe here a new TMS paradigm, named High-Density Theta Burst Stimulation (hdTBS). This paradigm delivers up to 6 pulses per burst, as opposed to only 3 in conventional TBS, while maintaining the inter-burst interval of 200 ms (or 5 Hz) - a critical parameter in inducing long-term potentiation. This paradigm was implemented on a TMS stimulator developed in-house; its physiological effects were assessed in the motor cortex of awake rats using a rodent specific focal TMS coil. Microwire electrodes were implanted into each rat's limb muscles to longitudinally record motor-evoked potential (MEP). Four different TBS paradigms (3, 4, 5 or 6 pulses per burst, 200 s per session) were tested; MEP signals were recorded immediately before (baseline) and up to 35 min post each TBS session.
RESULTS: We developed a stimulator based on a printed-circuit board strategy. The stimulator was able to deliver stable outputs of up to 6 pulses per burst. Animal experiments (n = 15) revealed significantly different aftereffects induced by the four TBS paradigms (Friedman test, p = 0.018). Post hoc analysis further revealed that, in comparison to conventional 3-pulse TBS, 5- and 6-pulse TBS enhanced the aftereffects of MEP signals by 56% and 92%, respectively, while maintaining identical time efficiency. CONCLUSION(S): A new stimulation paradigm is proposed, implemented and tested in the motor cortex of awake rats using a focal TMS coil developed in the lab. We observed enhanced aftereffects as assessed by MEP, with no obvious adverse effects, suggesting the translational potentials of this paradigm. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35636708      PMCID: PMC9357274          DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   9.184


  60 in total

1.  Some evidence supporting the safety of quadripulse stimulation (QPS).

Authors:  Setsu Nakatani-Enomoto; Ritsuko Hanajima; Masashi Hamada; Hitoshi Mochizuki; Shunsuke Kobayashi; Hiroyuki Enomoto; Yoshihiro Sugiura; Hideyuki Matsumoto; Toshiaki Furubayashi; Yasuo Terao; Fumio Sato; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Repetitive magnetic stimulation induces plasticity of excitatory postsynapses on proximal dendrites of cultured mouse CA1 pyramidal neurons.

Authors:  Maximilian Lenz; Steffen Platschek; Viola Priesemann; Denise Becker; Laurent M Willems; Ulf Ziemann; Thomas Deller; Florian Müller-Dahlhaus; Peter Jedlicka; Andreas Vlachos
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 3.270

3.  Patterned stimulation at the theta frequency is optimal for the induction of hippocampal long-term potentiation.

Authors:  J Larson; D Wong; G Lynch
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1986-03-19       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  A novel transcranial magnetic stimulator for focal stimulation of rodent brain.

Authors:  Qinglei Meng; Li Jing; Jean Paul Badjo; Xiaoming Du; Elliot Hong; Yihong Yang; Hanbing Lu; Fow-Sen Choa
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  Unilateral low frequency versus sequential bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: is simpler better for treatment of resistant depression?

Authors:  S Pallanti; S Bernardi; A Di Rollo; S Antonini; L Quercioli
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulator with controllable pulse parameters.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; David L Murphy; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  The relationship between individual alpha peak frequency and clinical outcome with repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD).

Authors:  Juliana Corlier; Linda L Carpenter; Andrew C Wilson; Eric Tirrell; A Polly Gobin; Brian Kavanaugh; Andrew F Leuchter
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Lateralization of forelimb motor evoked potentials by transcranial magnetic stimulation in rats.

Authors:  Alexander Rotenberg; Paul A Muller; Andrew M Vahabzadeh-Hagh; Xavier Navarro; Rubèn López-Vales; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Frances Jensen
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-11-08       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 9.  Translational neuromodulation: approximating human transcranial magnetic stimulation protocols in rats.

Authors:  Andrew M Vahabzadeh-Hagh; Paul A Muller; Roman Gersner; Abraham Zangen; Alexander Rotenberg
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2012-07-10

10.  Immediate Effects of Repetitive Magnetic Stimulation on Single Cortical Pyramidal Neurons.

Authors:  Jineta Banerjee; Mary E Sorrell; Pablo A Celnik; Galit Pelled
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.