Literature DB >> 34146593

Moving back in the brain to drive the field forward: Targeting neurostimulation to different brain regions in animal models of depression and neurodegeneration.

Michelle R Madore1, Eugenia Poh2, Samuel John Bollard2, Jesus Rivera3, Joy Taylor1, Jauhtai Cheng4, Eric Booth5, Monica Nable4, Alesha Heath1, Jerry Yesavage1, Jennifer Rodger2, M Windy McNerney6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is a promising noninvasive therapeutic tool for a variety of brain-related disorders. However, most therapeutic protocols target the anterior regions, leaving many other areas unexplored. There is a substantial therapeutic potential for stimulating various brain regions, which can be optimized in animal models. NEW
METHOD: We illustrate a method that can be utilized reliably to stimulate the anterior or posterior brain in freely moving rodents. A coil support device is surgically attached onto the skull, which is used for consistent coil placement over the course of up to several weeks of stimulation sessions.
RESULTS: Our methods provide reliable stimulation in animals without the need for restraint or sedation. We see little aversive effects of support placement and stimulation. Computational models provide evidence that moving the coil support location can be utilized to target major stimulation sites in humans and mice. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS WITH THIS
METHOD: Animal models are key to optimizing brain stimulation parameters, but research relies on restraint or sedation for consistency in coil placement. The method described here provides a unique means for reliable targeted stimulation in freely moving animals. Research utilizing this method has uncovered changes in biochemical and animal behavioral measurements as a function of brain stimulation.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of research on magnetic stimulation focuses on anterior regions. Given the substantial network connectivity throughout the brain, it is critical to develop a reliable method for stimulating different regions. The method described here can be utilized to better inform clinical trials about optimal treatment localization, stimulation intensity and number of treatment sessions, and provides a motivation for exploring posterior brain regions for both mice and humans. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer's disease; Animal models; Computational modeling; Depression; Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34146593      PMCID: PMC8349553          DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2021.109261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.987


  86 in total

1.  Long-lasting increase in corticospinal excitability after 1800 pulses of subthreshold 5 Hz repetitive TMS to the primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Alexander Peinemann; Bibiana Reimer; Christian Löer; Angelo Quartarone; Alexander Münchau; Bastian Conrad; Hartwig Roman Siebner
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  The NeuroStar TMS device: conducting the FDA approved protocol for treatment of depression.

Authors:  Jared C Horvath; John Mathews; Mark A Demitrack; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  ITK-SNAP: An interactive tool for semi-automatic segmentation of multi-modality biomedical images.

Authors:  Paul A Yushkevich; Guido Gerig
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2016-08

Review 4.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the prefrontal cortex in depression.

Authors:  Frank Padberg; Mark S George
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 5.330

5.  Rewiring the Addicted Brain: Circuits-Based Treatment for Addiction.

Authors:  Graziella Madeo; Antonello Bonci
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2019-05-16

Review 6.  Rehabilitating the addicted brain with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Marco Diana; Tommi Raij; Miriam Melis; Aapo Nummenmaa; Lorenzo Leggio; Antonello Bonci
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Morphological maturation of the mouse brain: An in vivo MRI and histology investigation.

Authors:  Luam Hammelrath; Siniša Škokić; Artem Khmelinskii; Andreas Hess; Noortje van der Knaap; Marius Staring; Boudewijn P F Lelieveldt; Dirk Wiedermann; Mathias Hoehn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Cerebellar Volume Is Associated with Cognitive Decline in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Results from ADNI.

Authors:  Chi-Ying Lin; Chi-Hua Chen; Sarah E Tom; Sheng-Han Kuo
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 9.  Restoring cognitive functions using non-invasive brain stimulation techniques in patients with cerebellar disorders.

Authors:  Paul A Pope; R Chris Miall
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  Cerebellar theta burst stimulation modulates short latency afferent inhibition in Alzheimer's disease patients.

Authors:  Francesco Di Lorenzo; Alessandro Martorana; Viviana Ponzo; Sonia Bonnì; Egidio D'Angelo; Carlo Caltagirone; Giacomo Koch
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 5.750

View more
  2 in total

1.  Manipulating the Level of Sensorimotor Stimulation during LI-rTMS Can Improve Visual Circuit Reorganisation in Adult Ephrin-A2A5-/- Mice.

Authors:  Eugenia Z Poh; Courtney Green; Luca Agostinelli; Marissa Penrose-Menz; Ann-Kathrin Karl; Alan R Harvey; Jennifer Rodger
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Improves Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor and Cholinergic Signaling in the 3xTgAD Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  M Windy McNerney; Alesha Heath; Sindhu K Narayanan; Jerome Yesavage
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 4.160

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.