Literature DB >> 30904423

Consistent linear and non-linear responses to invasive electrical brain stimulation across individuals and primate species with implanted electrodes.

Ishita Basu1, Madeline M Robertson2, Britni Crocker3, Noam Peled4, Kara Farnes5, Deborah I Vallejo-Lopez3, Helen Deng6, Matthew Thombs2, Clarissa Martinez-Rubio2, Jennifer J Cheng2, Eric McDonald2, Darin D Dougherty7, Emad N Eskandar2, Alik S Widge8, Angelique C Paulk9, Sydney S Cash3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Electrical neuromodulation via implanted electrodes is used in treating numerous neurological disorders, yet our knowledge of how different brain regions respond to varying stimulation parameters is sparse. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that the neural response to electrical stimulation is both region-specific and non-linearly related to amplitude and frequency.
METHODS: We examined evoked neural responses following 400 ms trains of 10-400 Hz electrical stimulation ranging from 0.1 to 10 mA. We stimulated electrodes implanted in cingulate cortex (dorsal anterior cingulate and rostral anterior cingulate) and subcortical regions (nucleus accumbens, amygdala) of non-human primates (NHP, N = 4) and patients with intractable epilepsy (N = 15) being monitored via intracranial electrodes. Recordings were performed in prefrontal, subcortical, and temporal lobe locations.
RESULTS: In subcortical regions as well as dorsal and rostral anterior cingulate cortex, response waveforms depended non-linearly on frequency (Pearson's linear correlation r < 0.39), but linearly on current (r > 0.58). These relationships between location, and input-output characteristics were similar in homologous brain regions with average Pearson's linear correlation values r > 0.75 between species and linear correlation values between participants r > 0.75 across frequency and current values per brain region. Evoked waveforms could be described by three main principal components (PCs) which allowed us to successfully predict response waveforms across individuals and across frequencies using PC strengths as functions of current and frequency using brain region specific regression models.
CONCLUSIONS: These results provide a framework for creation of an atlas of input-output relationships which could be used in the principled selection of stimulation parameters per brain region.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cingulate cortex; Current; Frequency; Intracranial; Local field potential; Neuromodulation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30904423      PMCID: PMC6752738          DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  51 in total

1.  Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulus evoked potentials: physiological and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Kenneth B Baker; Erwin B Montgomery; Ali R Rezai; Richard Burgess; Hans O Lüders
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 10.338

2.  Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression.

Authors:  Helen S Mayberg; Andres M Lozano; Valerie Voon; Heather E McNeely; David Seminowicz; Clement Hamani; Jason M Schwalb; Sidney H Kennedy
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest.

Authors:  Rahul S Desikan; Florent Ségonne; Bruce Fischl; Brian T Quinn; Bradford C Dickerson; Deborah Blacker; Randy L Buckner; Anders M Dale; R Paul Maguire; Bradley T Hyman; Marilyn S Albert; Ronald J Killiany
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Prospective long-term follow-up of 44 patients who received cingulotomy for treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Authors:  Darin D Dougherty; Lee Baer; G Rees Cosgrove; Edwin H Cassem; Bruce H Price; Andrew A Nierenberg; Michael A Jenike; Scott L Rauch
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 5.  Deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Joel S Perlmutter; Jonathan W Mink
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 12.449

6.  Electrophysiological effects and clinical results of direct brain stimulation for intractable epilepsy.

Authors:  Sozari A Chkhenkeli; Miron Sramka; George S Lortkipanidze; Tamaz N Rakviashvili; Eteri Sh Bregvadze; George E Magalashvili; Tamar Sh Gagoshidze; Irina S Chkhenkeli
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.876

7.  Combined volumetric and surface registration.

Authors:  Gheorghe Postelnicu; Lilla Zollei; Bruce Fischl
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 8.  The nucleus accumbens: a target for deep brain stimulation in obsessive-compulsive- and anxiety-disorders.

Authors:  Volker Sturm; Doris Lenartz; Athanasios Koulousakis; Harald Treuer; Karl Herholz; Johannes Christian Klein; Joachim Klosterkötter
Journal:  J Chem Neuroanat       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.052

9.  High and low frequency electrical stimulation in non-lesional temporal lobe epilepsy.

Authors:  Colette Boëx; Serge Vulliémoz; Laurent Spinelli; Claudio Pollo; Margitta Seeck
Journal:  Seizure       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 3.184

Review 10.  Network perspectives on the mechanisms of deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Cameron C McIntyre; Philip J Hahn
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2009-10-03       Impact factor: 5.996

View more
  12 in total

1.  A systematic exploration of parameters affecting evoked intracranial potentials in patients with epilepsy.

Authors:  Bornali Kundu; Tyler S Davis; Brian Philip; Elliot H Smith; Amir Arain; Angela Peters; Blake Newman; Christopher R Butson; John D Rolston
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Local and distant cortical responses to single pulse intracranial stimulation in the human brain are differentially modulated by specific stimulation parameters.

Authors:  Angelique C Paulk; Rina Zelmann; Britni Crocker; Alik S Widge; Darin D Dougherty; Emad N Eskandar; Daniel S Weisholtz; R Mark Richardson; G Rees Cosgrove; Ziv M Williams; Sydney S Cash
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Intracortical microstimulation pulse waveform and frequency recruits distinct spatiotemporal patterns of cortical neuron and neuropil activation.

Authors:  Kevin C Stieger; James R Eles; Kip A Ludwig; Takashi D Y Kozai
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Closed-loop enhancement and neural decoding of cognitive control in humans.

Authors:  Sydney S Cash; Alik S Widge; Ishita Basu; Ali Yousefi; Britni Crocker; Rina Zelmann; Angelique C Paulk; Noam Peled; Kristen K Ellard; Daniel S Weisholtz; G Rees Cosgrove; Thilo Deckersbach; Uri T Eden; Emad N Eskandar; Darin D Dougherty
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 29.234

5.  AJILE12: Long-term naturalistic human intracranial neural recordings and pose.

Authors:  Steven M Peterson; Satpreet H Singh; Benjamin Dichter; Michael Scheid; Rajesh P N Rao; Bingni W Brunton
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 8.501

6.  Invasive Electrophysiology for Circuit Discovery and Study of Comorbid Psychiatric Disorders in Patients With Epilepsy: Challenges, Opportunities, and Novel Technologies.

Authors:  Irena Balzekas; Vladimir Sladky; Petr Nejedly; Benjamin H Brinkmann; Daniel Crepeau; Filip Mivalt; Nicholas M Gregg; Tal Pal Attia; Victoria S Marks; Lydia Wheeler; Tori E Riccelli; Jeffrey P Staab; Brian Nils Lundstrom; Kai J Miller; Jamie Van Gompel; Vaclav Kremen; Paul E Croarkin; Gregory A Worrell
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 3.473

7.  Modelling and prediction of the dynamic responses of large-scale brain networks during direct electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Yuxiao Yang; Shaoyu Qiao; Omid G Sani; J Isaac Sedillo; Breonna Ferrentino; Bijan Pesaran; Maryam M Shanechi
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 25.671

8.  Decoding task engagement from distributed network electrophysiology in humans.

Authors:  Nicole R Provenza; Angelique C Paulk; Noam Peled; Maria I Restrepo; Sydney S Cash; Darin D Dougherty; Emad N Eskandar; David A Borton; Alik S Widge
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 9.  Stimulation Mapping Using Stereoelectroencephalography: Current and Future Directions.

Authors:  Derek D George; Steven G Ojemann; Cornelia Drees; John A Thompson
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Spatially confined responses of mouse visual cortex to intracortical magnetic stimulation from micro-coils.

Authors:  Sang Baek Ryu; Angelique C Paulk; Jimmy C Yang; Mehran Ganji; Shadi A Dayeh; Sydney S Cash; Shelley I Fried; Seung Woo Lee
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.