Literature DB >> 17582791

High and low frequency electrical stimulation in non-lesional temporal lobe epilepsy.

Colette Boëx1, Serge Vulliémoz, Laurent Spinelli, Claudio Pollo, Margitta Seeck.   

Abstract

In patients with pharmacologically intractable epilepsy who are not eligible for surgery, deep brain stimulation is currently under evaluation as an alternative treatment. Optimal stimulation parameters, including high (HFS) versus low frequency (LFS) stimulation, are not well defined. Here, we report the effects of HFS (130 pulses per second, pps) and LFS (5pps) of the principal epileptogenic focus, in three patients with non-lesional temporal lobe epilepsy. HFS, but not LFS, was associated with a reduction of the interictal discharges and absence of seizures. HFS may be beneficial in patients with non-lesional temporal lobe epilepsy who are not surgical candidates.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2007        PMID： 17582791     DOI： 10.1016/j.seizure.2007.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Seizure        ISSN： 1059-1311            Impact factor:   3.184


  15 in total

Review 1.  Deep Brain Stimulation for Epilepsy: Biomarkers for Optimization.

Authors:  Katrina L Dell; Mark J Cook; Matias I Maturana
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Deep brain stimulation in the dish: focus on mechanisms.

Authors:  Detlev Boison
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.500

3.  Consistent linear and non-linear responses to invasive electrical brain stimulation across individuals and primate species with implanted electrodes.

Authors:  Ishita Basu; Madeline M Robertson; Britni Crocker; Noam Peled; Kara Farnes; Deborah I Vallejo-Lopez; Helen Deng; Matthew Thombs; Clarissa Martinez-Rubio; Jennifer J Cheng; Eric McDonald; Darin D Dougherty; Emad N Eskandar; Alik S Widge; Angelique C Paulk; Sydney S Cash
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Local and distant cortical responses to single pulse intracranial stimulation in the human brain are differentially modulated by specific stimulation parameters.

Authors:  Angelique C Paulk; Rina Zelmann; Britni Crocker; Alik S Widge; Darin D Dougherty; Emad N Eskandar; Daniel S Weisholtz; R Mark Richardson; G Rees Cosgrove; Ziv M Williams; Sydney S Cash
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 5.  Toward rational design of electrical stimulation strategies for epilepsy control.

Authors:  Sridhar Sunderam; Bruce Gluckman; Davide Reato; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 2.937

6.  8-hydroxy-dipropylaminotetralin promotes neural plasticity in epileptic rats with depression.

Authors:  Ping Yang; Meizhen Sun; Liang Li; Yihua Shen
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 5.135

7.  Deep brain stimulation for refractory epilepsy.

Authors:  Tomasz Tykocki; Tomasz Mandat; Anna Kornakiewicz; Henryk Koziara; Paweł Nauman
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 3.318

8.  The effects of acute responsive high frequency stimulation of the subiculum on the intra-hippocampal kainic acid seizure model in rats.

Authors:  L Huang; G Luijtelaar
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 2.708

9.  Differential Modulation of Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons during Periodic Stimulation.

Authors:  Mufti Mahmud; Stefano Vassanelli
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 10.  Neurostimulation as a promising epilepsy therapy.

Authors:  Yicong Lin; Yuping Wang
Journal:  Epilepsia Open       Date:  2017-08-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.