| Literature DB >> 30901901 |
Nataliia P Antonova1,2, Daria V Vasina3, Anastasiya M Lendel4, Evgeny V Usachev5, Valentine V Makarov6, Alexander L Gintsburg7, Artem P Tkachuk8, Vladimir A Gushchin9,10.
Abstract
The extremely rapid spread of multiple-antibiotic resistance among Gram-negative pathogens threatens to move humankind into the so-called "post-antibiotic era" in which the most efficient and safe antibiotics will not work. Bacteriophage lysins represent promising alternatives to antibiotics, as they are capable of digesting bacterial cell wall peptidoglycans to promote their osmotic lysis. However, relatively little is known regarding the spectrum of lysin bactericidal activity against Gram-negative bacteria. In this study, we present the results of in vitro activity assays of three putative and newly cloned Myoviridae bacteriophage endolysins (LysAm24, LysECD7, and LysSi3). The chosen proteins represent lysins with diverse domain organization (single-domain vs. two-domain) and different predicted mechanisms of action (lysozyme vs. peptidase). The enzymes were purified, and their properties were characterized. The enzymes were tested against a panel of Gram-negative clinical bacterial isolates comprising all Gram-negative representatives of the ESKAPE group. Despite exhibiting different structural organizations, all of the assayed lysins were shown to be capable of lysing Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and Salmonella typhi strains. Less than 50 μg/mL was enough to eradicate growing cells over more than five orders of magnitude. Thus, LysAm24, LysECD7, and LysSi3 represent promising therapeutic agents for drug development.Entities:
Keywords: ESKAPE; Myoviridae; bacteriophage-derived lytic enzyme; bacteriophages; endolysin; enzybiotics; in vitro activity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30901901 PMCID: PMC6466606 DOI: 10.3390/v11030284
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.048
Bacterial strains used in the study and the sources of their isolation.
| Strain | Source | |
|---|---|---|
| Patient’s sputum, hospital strain | ICU 1 | |
| Patient’s wound fluid, hospital strain | ICU | |
| Patient’s urea, hospital strain | ICU | |
| Patient’s sputum, hospital strain | ICU | |
| Patient’s sputum, hospital strain | ICU | |
| Infusion pump, hospital strain | ICU | |
| Infusion pump, hospital strain | ICU | |
| Patient’s urea, hospital strain | Inpatient hospital | |
| Patient’s sputum, hospital strain | ICU | |
| Patient’s sputum, hospital strain | Outpatient hospital | |
| Patient’s liquor, hospital strain | Inpatient hospital | |
| Patient’s blood, hospital strain | ICU | |
| Patient’s oral pharynx, hospital strain | Inpatient hospital | |
| Reference laboratory strain | - | |
| Reference laboratory strain | - | |
| Patient’s nasal swab | Outpatient hospital | |
| Patient’s urethra | Outpatient hospital | |
| Laboratory expression strain | - | |
1 ICU: intensive care unit.
Endolysins used in the study.
| Enzyme | Enzyme Source | Phage Host | GB |
|---|---|---|---|
| LysAm24 | Acinetobacter phage AM24 |
| APD20282.1 |
| LysECD7 | Escherichia phage ECD7 |
| ASJ80195.1 |
| LysSi3 | Enterobacteria phage UAB_Phi87 |
| YP_009150069.1 |
Figure 1Domain organization, purification, and physicochemical properties of LysAm24, LysECD7, and LysSi3. (a) Putative domain organization of LysAm24, LysECD7, and LysSi3 predicted from the deduced amino acid sequences. The prediction was done with the protein BLAST search (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). (b) SDS-PAGE gel analysis of purified endolysins. The PageRuler Broad range Unstained Protein Ladder (Thermo Scientific, Vilnius, Lithuania) was used (c) Evaluation of the hydrodynamic diameter of E. coli-produced endolysins by DLS analysis. Statistical distribution of particle size by number. The data are presented as the mean values of three measurements ± SD. (d) Temperature dependence of the total light scattering intensity (upper panel) and the hydrodynamic diameters of the particles (lower panel). The data are presented as the mean values of three measurements made with an interval of 15 s ± SD.
Figure 2Bactericidal activity and biochemical properties of LysAm24, LysECD7, and LysSi3. (a) Bactericidal activity of different concentrations of LysAm24 against A. baumannii Ts 50-16, LysECD7 against E. coli M15 and LysSi3 against the A. baumannii Ts 50-16 in exponential phase. Cell cultures without incubation with endolysins were used as controls. The number of surviving cells after 18 h is expressed as reduction in log10 CFU/mL compared to the control. NS, no statistical significance of the data compared to the untreated culture is observed (p > 0.05, Mann–Whitney test). (b) Activity of lysins against both exponentially growing cells (Exp) and stationary-phase cells (Stat) of A. baumannii Ts 50-16 without and in the presence of EDTA. The residual activity after 18 h of growth compared to the untreated culture is shown. NS, no statistical significance of the data compared to the exponential growth phase is observed (p > 0.05, Mann–Whitney test). (c) Effects of salts on the bactericidal activity against A. baumannii Ts 50-16. The residual activity after 18 h of growth compared to the untreated culture is shown. NS, no statistical significance of the data compared to the untreated culture is observed (p > 0.05, Mann–Whitney test). For all experiments, the mean values are shown (± standard error of the mean (SEM)) from three independent experiments. Asterisk (*) indicates significant effect on bactericidal activity.
Figure 3Effects of pH and EDTA on the antibacterial activity of LysAm24, LysECD7, and LysSi3 against exponentially growing cells. The residual activity after 18 h of growth compared to the untreated culture is shown. For all experiments, the mean values are shown (±SEM) from three independent experiments. NS, no statistical significance of the data compared to the untreated control culture (p > 0.05, Mann–Whitney test). All other data points were statistically significant compared to the untreated control culture.
Figure 4Endolysin activity against different strains of Gram-negative bacteria. Bacterial count (cfu/mL) was used as the method of choice for all strains: (a) LysAm24, (b) LysECD7, (c) LysSi3. For all experiments, the mean values are shown (±SEM) from three independent experiments. NA, no bactericidal activity was detected. All other data points were statistically significant compared to the untreated control culture (p < 0.05, Mann–Whitney test).
Heatmap of estimated endolysin C-termini charges over the pH range and the residual antibacterial activity within this range (http://protcalc.sourceforge.net/). Min to Max pKa and residual activity is indicated with the color scale from red to green background. For all experiments, the mean values of three independent experiments are shown.
| pH | C-Termini Charge (pKa) | Residual Antibacterial Activity, % | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LysAm24 | LysECD7 | LysSi3 | LysAm24 | LysECD7 | LysSi3 | ||
| 5.00 | 12.80 | 8.00 | 13.80 | 98.8 | 100.0 | 99.8 | |
| 5.50 | 11.60 | 7.30 | 12.60 | 99.,4 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |
| 6.00 | 10.20 | 6.10 | 11.20 | 97.2 | 97.6 | 99.9 | |
| 6.50 | 8.00 | 4.00 | 9.00 | 55.0 | 75.0 | 57.2 | |
| 7.00 | 5.80 | 1.80 | 6.80 | 45.0 | 62.5 | 29.2 | |
| 7.50 | 4.40 | 0.50 | 5.40 | 62.5 | 94.5 | 88.5 | |
| 8.00 | 3.40 | −0.30 | 4.40 | 57.5 | 96.5 | 98.8 | |
| 8.50 | 2.60 | −0.70 | 3.50 | 16.0 | 90.0 | 69.0 | |
| 9.00 | 1.80 | −1.00 | 2.50 | 45.0 | 50.0 | 65.0 | |