| Literature DB >> 32429199 |
Mikhail V Fursov1, Radmila O Abdrakhmanova2, Nataliia P Antonova3,4, Daria V Vasina3,5, Anastasia D Kolchanova1, Olga A Bashkina2, Oleg V Rubalsky2, Marina A Samotrueva2, Vasiliy D Potapov1, Valentine V Makarov6, Sergey M Yudin6, Alexander L Gintsburg3,7, Artem P Tkachuk3, Vladimir A Gushchin3,4, Evgenii O Rubalskii8,9,10.
Abstract
Surfaces of implanted medical devices are highly susceptible to biofilm formation. Bacteria in biofilms are embedded in a self-produced extracellular matrix that inhibits the penetration of antibiotics and significantly contributes to the mechanical stability of the colonizing community which leads to an increase in morbidity and mortality rate in clinical settings. Therefore, new antibiofilm approaches and substances are urgently needed. In this paper, we test the efficacy of a broad-range recombinant endolysin of the coliphage LysECD7 against forming and mature biofilms. We used a strong biofilm producer-Klebsiella pneumoniae Ts 141-14 clinical isolate. In vitro investigation of the antibacterial activity was performed using the standard biofilm assay in microtiter plates. We optimized the implantable diffusion chamber approach in order to reach strong biofilm formation in vivo avoiding severe consequences of the pathogen for the animals and to obtain a well-reproducible model of implant-associated infection. Endolysin LysECD7 significantly reduced the biofilm formation and was capable of degrading the preformed biofilm in vitro. The animal trials on the preformed biofilms confirmed these results. Overall, our results show that LysECD7 is a promising substance against clinically relevant biofilms.Entities:
Keywords: animal trial; biofilm degradation; drug-resistant bacteria; endolysin; implant-associated infection model
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32429199 PMCID: PMC7291189 DOI: 10.3390/v12050545
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.048
Figure 1Experimental pipeline of the in vivo study.
Figure 2Antibacterial activity of the LysECD7 and amikacin (AMK) against forming biofilm of K. pneumoniae Ts 141-14 measured after 24 h of culture incubation; Untreated—untreated BF; PBS—BF treated with Phosphate-Buffered Saline; Tris-HCl—BF treated with 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer; AMK 50 (64 µM)—forming BF treated with 50 µg/mL AMK; LysECD7 1000 (62 µM)—forming BF treated with 1000 µg/mL LysECD7; AMK 100 (128 µM)—forming BF treated with 100 µg/mL AMK; LysECD7 3000 (186 µM)—forming BF treated with 3000 µg/mL LysECD7; AMK 250 (320 µM)—forming BF treated with 250 µg/mL AMK. Weak, moderate and strong BF were estimated according to Stepanovic et al., 2007 [21]. Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation; “ns”—no significant differences were observed (one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test). Differences between treatments and controls were significant (p < 0.0001).
Figure 3Antibacterial activity of the LysECD7 and amikacin (AMK) against mature BF measured after 43 h of culture incubation of K. pneumoniae strain Ts 141-14; Untreated—untreated BF; PBS—BF treated with Phosphate-Buffered Saline; Tris-HCl—BF treated with 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer; AMK 50 (64 µM)—mature BF treated with 50 µg/mL AMK; LysECD7 1000 (62 µM)—mature BF treated with 1000 µg/mL LysECD7; AMK 100 (128 µM)—mature BF treated with 100 µg/mL AMK; LysECD7 3000 (186 µM)—mature BF treated with 3000 µg/mL LysECD7; AMK 250 (320 µM)—mature BF treated with 250 µg/mL AMK. Weak, moderate and strong BF were estimated according to Stepanovic et al., 2007 [21]. Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation. Significant differences with the AMK groups are shown as p-values (one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test). Differences between treatments and controls were significant (p < 0.0001).
Comparative characteristics of the K. pneumoniae Ts 141-14 biofilms formation in vivo.
| Indicator | Before Implantation | Two Days After Implantation | Four Days After Implantation | Six Days After Implantation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| General clinical condition | Not changed | Not changed | Not changed | The animal is inactive, with a lack of appetite |
| Postoperative wound condition | – | Primary intention healing | Primary intention healing | Primary healing, slight inflammation of the postoperative wound |
| Visual inflammation of surrounding tissues | – | Slight inflammatory infiltration of tissue surrounding the chamber | Absent | Inflammatory infiltration of tissues surrounding the chamber, peri implant zone exudate |
| Sterility of the surrounding tissues | – | Sterile | Sterile | Sterile |
| Sterility of the implant external surface | Sterile | Sterile | Sterile | Sterile |
| Visual characteristics of the frame inner surface | No visible BF | No visible BF | The presence of mucous BF | The presence of a dense, non-stretching BF |
| Visual characteristics of the membrane inner surface | No visible biofilm | No visible biofilm | No visible biofilm | The presence of a dense, non-stretching biofilm |
The sign “-“ corresponds to not applicable indicatiors.
Figure 4Intraoperative view of the diffusion chambers in the abdominal cavity on the 8th day of administration of: (a) LysECD7 (100 µg/mL), (b) amikacin (5 mg/mL), (c) vehicle control.
Figure 5Count of culturable bacteria in the formed biofilms in diffusion chambers in vivo during performed therapy. Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation. Significant differences with the vehicle control group are shown as p values, otherwise no statistical difference was found (two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test). On the 5th day, a significant difference between endolysin and antibiotic groups was also detected (p = 0.0001).
Figure 6Dynamics of the biomass of biofilms in diffusion chambers in vivo during performed therapy. Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation. Significant differences with the vehicle control group are shown as p values, otherwise no statistical difference was found (two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test).