Literature DB >> 30900370

The smart negative pressure (SNaP) wound care system: A case series from Singapore.

Ian J Y Wee1, Manfred Mak2, Gavin O'Donnell2, Jerilyn Tan2, Tze T Chong3, Tjun Y Tang3.   

Abstract

The Smart Negative Pressure (SNaP) wound care system is a novel device that is single-patient use, ultra-portable, and light weight and does not rely on battery or need recharging. A systematic search was performed on major databases to identify relevant articles including case reports, retrospective case series, and randomised controlled trials. Ten studies were identified, showing that the SNaP wound care system is an effective tool in treating small-sized wounds and may serve as an alternative to current electrically powered modalities. Furthermore, the system's small size and convenience leads to greater patient satisfaction and improves quality of life. Finally, we report our initial positive experiences with two cases in our institution. Although the evidence thus far has been encouraging, and patient satisfaction is higher than other wound care systems, further evidence is required to determine its superiority over current systems in terms of wound-healing outcomes.
© 2019 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SNaP; outcome; vacuum-assisted closure; wound

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30900370      PMCID: PMC7948783          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  17 in total

1.  The SNaP system: biomechanical and animal model testing of a novel ultraportable negative-pressure wound therapy system.

Authors:  Kenton D Fong; Dean Hu; Shaundra Eichstadt; Deepak M Gupta; Moshe Pinto; Geoffrey C Gurtner; Michael T Longaker; H Peter Lorenz
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  State-of-the-art treatment of chronic leg ulcers: A randomized controlled trial comparing vacuum-assisted closure (V.A.C.) with modern wound dressings.

Authors:  Jeroen D D Vuerstaek; Tryfon Vainas; Jan Wuite; Patty Nelemans; Martino H A Neumann; Joep C J M Veraart
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Comparative effectiveness of mechanically and electrically powered negative pressure wound therapy devices: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  David G Armstrong; William A Marston; Alexander M Reyzelman; Robert S Kirsner
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.617

4.  Negative pressure wound therapy after partial diabetic foot amputation: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  David G Armstrong; Lawrence A Lavery
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-11-12       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Comparative effectiveness of the SNaP™ Wound Care System.

Authors:  David W Hutton; Peter Sheehan
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Prevalence of chronic wounds in the general population: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Laura Martinengo; Maja Olsson; Ram Bajpai; Michael Soljak; Zee Upton; Artur Schmidtchen; Josip Car; Krister Järbrink
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.797

7.  A mechanically powered negative pressure device used in conjunction with a bioengineered cell-based product for the treatment of pyoderma gangrenosum: a case report .

Authors:  Katherine Neiderer; Billy Martin; Steven Hoffman; David Jolley; James Dancho
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.629

8.  Evaluation of chronic wound treatment with the SNaP wound care system versus modern dressing protocols.

Authors:  Bruce Lerman; Leslie Oldenbrook; Shaundra L Eichstadt; Justin Ryu; Kenton D Fong; Peter J Schubart
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Comparison of negative pressure wound therapy using vacuum-assisted closure with advanced moist wound therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Peter A Blume; Jodi Walters; Wyatt Payne; Jose Ayala; John Lantis
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-12-27       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  SNaP® Wound Care System: Ultraportable Mechanically Powered Negative Pressure Wound Therapy.

Authors:  Kenton D Fong; William A Marston
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  1 in total

1.  The smart negative pressure (SNaP) wound care system: A case series from Singapore.

Authors:  Ian J Y Wee; Manfred Mak; Gavin O'Donnell; Jerilyn Tan; Tze T Chong; Tjun Y Tang
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.315

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.