Literature DB >> 20885246

Evaluation of chronic wound treatment with the SNaP wound care system versus modern dressing protocols.

Bruce Lerman1, Leslie Oldenbrook, Shaundra L Eichstadt, Justin Ryu, Kenton D Fong, Peter J Schubart.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traditional negative-pressure wound therapy systems use an electrically powered pump to generate negative pressure at the wound bed. The SNaP Wound Care System is a novel, ultraportable device that delivers negative-pressure wound therapy without the use of an electrically powered pump.
METHODS: At an outpatient wound care clinic, 21 subjects with difficult-to-treat lower extremity ulcers received treatment with the SNaP System and were evaluated for wound healing for up to 4 months. Outcomes were then compared with 42 patient-matched controls treated at the same center with modern wound care protocols that included the use of Apligraf, Regranex, and skin grafting.
RESULTS: In the SNaP-treated group, 100 percent of subjects demonstrated improvement in wound size and 86 percent (18 of 21) exhibited a statistically significant healing trend (p < 0.05). Using Kaplan-Meier estimates of wound healing, SNaP-treated subjects healed in an average of 74.25 ± 20.1 days from the start of SNaP treatment and the matched controls healed in an average of 148.73 ± 63.1 days from the start of conventional treatment. This significantly faster healing time represents a 50 percent absolute reduction in time to healing (p < 0.0001) for subjects treated with the SNaP device.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings reported here for the SNaP Wound Care System are similar to published reports for powered negative-pressure wound therapy devices for the treatment of highly challenging lower extremity wounds. This study suggests that the SNaP Wound Care System may be a useful addition to the techniques available to the wound care clinician.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20885246     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ea4559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  10 in total

Review 1.  Traditional Chinese medicine for pressure ulcer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qin-Hong Zhang; Zhong-Ren Sun; Jin-Huan Yue; Xue Ren; Li-Bo Qiu; Xiao-Lin Lv; Wei Du
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Comparative effectiveness of the SNaP™ Wound Care System.

Authors:  David W Hutton; Peter Sheehan
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Topical Negative Pressure Device in Promoting Healing in Chronic Wounds.

Authors:  Sarah Bradbury; Neal Walkley; Nicola Ivins; Keith Harding
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  A Wireless Electroceutical Dressing Lowers Cost of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy.

Authors:  Piya Das Ghatak; Richard Schlanger; Kasturi Ganesh; Lynn Lambert; Gayle M Gordillo; Patsy Martinsek; Sashwati Roy
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  The smart negative pressure (SNaP) wound care system: A case series from Singapore.

Authors:  Ian J Y Wee; Manfred Mak; Gavin O'Donnell; Jerilyn Tan; Tze T Chong; Tjun Y Tang
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers Using Mechanically Versus Electrically Powered Negative Pressure Wound Therapy.

Authors:  William A Marston; David G Armstrong; Alexander M Reyzelman; Robert S Kirsner
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  The SNaP Wound Care System: a case series using a novel ultraportable negative pressure wound therapy device for the treatment of diabetic lower extremity wounds.

Authors:  Bruce Lerman; Leslie Oldenbrook; Justin Ryu; Kenton D Fong; Peter J Schubart
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-07-01

Review 8.  Management of diabetic foot: Brief synopsis for busy orthopedist.

Authors:  Tae Hwan Park; Ashish Anand
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2014-11-14

9.  SNaP® Wound Care System: Ultraportable Mechanically Powered Negative Pressure Wound Therapy.

Authors:  Kenton D Fong; William A Marston
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Mechanically powered negative pressure wound therapy as a bolster for skin grafting.

Authors:  Adam L Isaac; Jessica Rose; David G Armstrong
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-03-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.