Literature DB >> 21385320

Comparative effectiveness of the SNaP™ Wound Care System.

David W Hutton1, Peter Sheehan.   

Abstract

Diabetic lower extremity wounds cause substantial burden to healthcare systems, costing tens of thousands of dollars per episode. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) devices have been shown to be cost-effective at treating these wounds, but the traditional devices use bulky electrical pumps that require a durable medical equipment rental-based procurement process. The Spiracur SNaP™ Wound Care System is an ultraportable NPWT system that does not use an electric pump and is fully disposable. It has superior healing compared to standard of care with modern dressings and comparable healing to traditional NPWT devices while giving patients greater mobility and giving clinicians a simpler procurement process. We used a mathematical model to analyse the costs of the SNaP™ system and compare them to standard of care and electrically powered NPWT devices. When compared to standard of care, the SNaP™ system saves over $9000 per wound treated and more than doubles the number of patients healed. The SNaP system has similar healing time to powered NPWT devices, but saves $2300 in Medicare payments or $2800 for private payers per wound treated. Our analysis shows that the SNaP™ system could save substantial treatment costs in addition to allowing patients greater freedom and mobility.
© 2011 The Authors. © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd and Medicalhelplines.com Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21385320      PMCID: PMC7951006          DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00775.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  23 in total

1.  Medicare Part B negative pressure wound therapy pump policy. A partner for Medicare Part A PPS.

Authors:  Kathleen D Schaum
Journal:  Home Healthc Nurse       Date:  2002-01

2.  State-of-the-art treatment of chronic leg ulcers: A randomized controlled trial comparing vacuum-assisted closure (V.A.C.) with modern wound dressings.

Authors:  Jeroen D D Vuerstaek; Tryfon Vainas; Jan Wuite; Patty Nelemans; Martino H A Neumann; Joep C J M Veraart
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 3.  Negative pressure wound therapy: a vacuum of evidence?

Authors:  Sven Gregor; Marc Maegele; Stefan Sauerland; Jan F Krahn; Frank Peinemann; Stefan Lange
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2008-02

Review 4.  A systematic review of topical negative pressure therapy for acute and chronic wounds.

Authors:  D T Ubbink; S J Westerbos; E A Nelson; H Vermeulen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 5.  The global burden of diabetic foot disease.

Authors:  Andrew J M Boulton; Loretta Vileikyte; Gunnel Ragnarson-Tennvall; Jan Apelqvist
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-11-12       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Costs of lower-extremity ulcers among patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Karen Stockl; Ann Vanderplas; Eskinder Tafesse; Eunice Chang
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Resource utilization and economic costs of care based on a randomized trial of vacuum-assisted closure therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot wounds.

Authors:  Jan Apelqvist; David G Armstrong; Lawrence A Lavery; Andrew J M Boulton
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Comparison of negative pressure wound therapy using vacuum-assisted closure with advanced moist wound therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Peter A Blume; Jodi Walters; Wyatt Payne; Jose Ayala; John Lantis
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-12-27       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Negative-pressure wound therapy and diabetic foot amputations: a retrospective study of payer claims data.

Authors:  Robert G Frykberg; David V Williams
Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct

10.  A prospective randomized evaluation of negative-pressure wound dressings for diabetic foot wounds.

Authors:  Mark T Eginton; Kellie R Brown; Gary R Seabrook; Jonathan B Towne; Robert A Cambria
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2003-10-13       Impact factor: 1.466

View more
  2 in total

1.  The smart negative pressure (SNaP) wound care system: A case series from Singapore.

Authors:  Ian J Y Wee; Manfred Mak; Gavin O'Donnell; Jerilyn Tan; Tze T Chong; Tjun Y Tang
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Design, testing, and scale-up of medical devices for global health: negative pressure wound therapy and non-surgical male circumcision in Rwanda.

Authors:  Gita N Mody; Vincent Mutabazi; Danielle R Zurovcik; Jean Paul Bitega; Sabin Nsanzimana; Sardis H Harward; Claire M Wagner; Cameron T Nutt; Agnes Binagwaho
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 4.185

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.