Literature DB >> 30890781

A case-note review of continued pregnancies found to be at a high risk of Huntington's disease: considerations for clinical practice.

Felicity Wadrup1, Simon Holden1,2, Rhona MacLeod3,4, Zosia Miedzybrodzka5,6, Andrea H Németh7,8, Shan Owens9,10, Sara Pasalodos11, Oliver Quarrell12, Angus J Clarke13.   

Abstract

Huntington's disease (HD) is a severe neurodegenerative condition that impacts the whole family. Prenatal diagnosis by direct or exclusion testing is available for couples at risk of transmitting HD to their children. An ethical problem can arise after prenatal diagnosis for HD if a known 'high risk' pregnancy is continued to term: international guidelines emphasise that this situation should be avoided where possible, as it removes the resulting child's future right to make an informed, autonomous decision about predictive testing. The UK Huntington's Disease Predictive Testing Consortium recorded 21 pregnancies that were tested, identified as high-risk and then continued. In this qualitative study, health professionals reviewed the case notes of 15 of these pregnancies. This analysis generated guidelines for clinical practice. It is recommended that practitioners: (i) remind couples of the long-term consequences of continuing a high risk pregnancy, (ii) ensure couples understand the information provided, (iii) collaborate closely with other professionals involved in the couple's prenatal care, (iv) prepare couples for the procedural aspects of prenatal diagnosis and a possible termination of pregnancy, (v) allow time for in-depth pre-test counselling, (vi) explain the rationale for only making prenatal diagnosis available subject to conditions, whilst allowing for human ambivalence and acknowledging that these 'conditions' cannot be enforced, (vii) monitor the whole clinical process to ensure that it works 'smoothly', (viii) recommend couples do not disclose the result of the prenatal test to protect the confidentiality and autonomy of the future 'high-risk' child, and (ix) offer on-going contact and support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30890781      PMCID: PMC6777622          DOI: 10.1038/s41431-019-0375-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  32 in total

1.  Recommendations for the predictive genetic test in Huntington's disease.

Authors:  R MacLeod; A Tibben; M Frontali; G Evers-Kiebooms; A Jones; A Martinez-Descales; R A Roos
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 4.438

2.  "Testing times, challenging choices": an Australian study of prenatal genetic counseling.

Authors:  Jan M Hodgson; Lynn H Gillam; Margaret A Sahhar; Sylvia A Metcalfe
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Genetic prediction and family structure in Huntington's chorea.

Authors:  P S Harper; M Sarfarazi
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-06-29

4.  Negotiating responsibility: case studies of reproductive decision-making and prenatal genetic testing in families facing Huntington disease.

Authors:  Claudia Downing
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  DNA analysis of Huntington's disease: five years of experience in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.

Authors:  F Laccone; U Engel; E Holinski-Feder; M Weigell-Weber; K Marczinek; D Nolte; D J Morris-Rosendahl; C Zühlke; K Fuchs; H Weirich-Schwaiger; G Schlüter; G von Beust; A M Vieira-Saecker; B H Weber; O Riess
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1999-09-11       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Exclusion testing in pregnancy for Huntington's disease.

Authors:  A Tyler; O W Quarrell; L P Lazarou; A L Meredith; P S Harper
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  Predictive, pre-natal and diagnostic genetic testing for Huntington's disease: the experience in Canada from 1987 to 2000.

Authors:  S Creighton; E W Almqvist; D MacGregor; B Fernandez; H Hogg; J Beis; J P Welch; C Riddell; R Lokkesmoe; M Khalifa; J MacKenzie; A Sajoo; S Farrell; F Robert; A Shugar; A Summers; W Meschino; D Allingham-Hawkins; T Chiu; A Hunter; J Allanson; H Hare; J Schween; L Collins; S Sanders; C Greenberg; S Cardwell; E Lemire; P MacLeod; M R Hayden
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.438

8.  The psychological effects of prenatal diagnostic procedures: maternal anxiety before and after invasive and noninvasive procedures.

Authors:  Sandra Nakić Radoš; Vesna Košec; Vesna Gall
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.050

9.  Prenatal diagnosis and caring.

Authors:  N C Chescheir; R C Cefalo
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  1992

10.  Five year study of prenatal testing for Huntington's disease: demand, attitudes, and psychological assessment.

Authors:  S Adam; S Wiggins; P Whyte; M Bloch; M H Shokeir; H Soltan; W Meschino; A Summers; O Suchowersky; J P Welch
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 6.318

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.