Literature DB >> 19798554

"Testing times, challenging choices": an Australian study of prenatal genetic counseling.

Jan M Hodgson1, Lynn H Gillam, Margaret A Sahhar, Sylvia A Metcalfe.   

Abstract

In many countries pregnant women deemed to be at increased risk for fetal anomaly following a screening test may attend a genetic counseling session to receive information and support in decision-making about subsequent diagnostic testing. This paper presents findings from an Australian study that explored 21 prenatal genetic counseling sessions conducted by five different genetic counselors. All were attended by pregnant women who had received an increased risk result from a maternal serum screening (MSS) test and who were offered a diagnostic test. Qualitative methods were used to analyze the content and structure of sessions and explore the counseling interactions. Findings from this cohort demonstrate that, within these prenatal genetic counseling sessions, counselor dialogue predominated. Overall the sessions were characterized by: a) an emphasis on information-giving b) a lack of dialogue about relevant sensitive topics such as disability and abortion. Arguably, this resulted in missed opportunities for client deliberation and informed decision-making. These findings have implications for the training and practice of genetic counselors and all healthcare professionals who communicate with women about prenatal testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19798554     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-009-9248-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  25 in total

1.  Descriptive information about Down syndrome: a content analysis of serum screening leaflets.

Authors:  L D Bryant; J Murray; J M Green; J Hewison; I Sehmi; A Ellis
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  The imperative character of medical technology and the meaning of "anticipated decision regret".

Authors:  T Tymstra
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 3.  Invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures 2005.

Authors:  Mark I Evans; Ronald J Wapner
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.300

4.  Variation in content in prenatal genetic counseling interviews.

Authors:  B M Burke; A Kolker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Practice variability in prenatal genetic counseling.

Authors:  E T Matloff
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Psychological Aspects of Genetic Counseling. X. Advanced Counseling Techniques.

Authors:  S Kessler
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  "Talking About Chance": The Presentation of Risk Information During Genetic Counseling for Breast and Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  N Hallowell; H Statham; F Murton; J Green; M Richards
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  New hope for the retarded?

Authors:  L E Karp
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1983-09

9.  Women's experience of maternal serum screening.

Authors:  J C Carroll; J B Brown; A J Reid; P Pugh
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 10.  Psychosocial aspects of genetic screening of pregnant women and newborns: a systematic review.

Authors:  J M Green; J Hewison; H L Bekker; L D Bryant; H S Cuckle
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.014

View more
  11 in total

1.  Commentary: how individual and profession-level factors influence discussion of disability in prenatal genetic counseling.

Authors:  Jan Hodgson; Jon Weil
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  A case-note review of continued pregnancies found to be at a high risk of Huntington's disease: considerations for clinical practice.

Authors:  Felicity Wadrup; Simon Holden; Rhona MacLeod; Zosia Miedzybrodzka; Andrea H Németh; Shan Owens; Sara Pasalodos; Oliver Quarrell; Angus J Clarke
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Comparing genetic counselor's and patient's perceptions of needs in prenatal chromosomal microarray testing.

Authors:  Sarah A Walser; Katherine S Kellom; Steven C Palmer; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 4.  The relationship between the genetic counseling profession and the disability community: a commentary.

Authors:  Anne C Madeo; Barbara B Biesecker; Campbell Brasington; Lori H Erby; Kathryn F Peters
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 2.802

5.  Talking about disability in prenatal genetic counseling: a report of two interactive workshops.

Authors:  Jan Hodgson; Jon Weil
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Perceived Changes to Obstetric Care and the Integration of Personal and Professional Life as a Pregnant Prenatal Genetic Counselor.

Authors:  Jennifer L Rietzler; Laura E Birkeland; Elizabeth M Petty
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  'And then you can decide'--antenatal foetal diagnosis decision making in South Africa.

Authors:  Tina-Marié Wessels; Tom Koole; Claire Penn
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Attitudes of mothers of children with down syndrome towards noninvasive prenatal testing.

Authors:  Gregory Kellogg; Leah Slattery; Louanne Hudgins; Kelly Ormond
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  The knowledge value-chain of genetic counseling for breast cancer: an empirical assessment of prediction and communication processes.

Authors:  Nabil Amara; Jolyane Blouin-Bougie; Jalila Jbilou; Norrin Halilem; Jacques Simard; Réjean Landry
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 10.  The role of the genetic counsellor: a systematic review of research evidence.

Authors:  Heather Skirton; Christophe Cordier; Charlotta Ingvoldstad; Nicolas Taris; Caroline Benjamin
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.