Literature DB >> 23966135

The psychological effects of prenatal diagnostic procedures: maternal anxiety before and after invasive and noninvasive procedures.

Sandra Nakić Radoš1, Vesna Košec, Vesna Gall.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: (1) To examine the change in anxiety before and after prenatal diagnostic procedures in women undergoing invasive (amniocentesis) and noninvasive (ultrasound) procedures; and (2) to examine predictors of anxiety before the diagnostic procedure.
METHODS: A short-term follow-up study was conducted on a sample of pregnant women in the second trimester. Questionnaires were administered to women scheduled for amniocentesis (n = 37) and ultrasonography (n = 37) before and immediately after the procedure. The following questionnaires were administered: the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, the Affect Intensity Measure, the COPE inventory, and the Optimism-Pessimism Scale.
RESULTS: Prior to the administration of the prenatal diagnostic procedure, measured anxiety levels were the same in both groups of women (p > 0.05). An interaction effect of a two-way ANOVA revealed that anxiety decreased after the procedure in the ultrasound but not the amniocentesis group (F(1, 72) = 5.01, p = 0.028). Although coping styles and affect intensity were found to be related to anxiety (p < 0.05), they were not significant predictors of anxiety before the diagnostic procedure when controlling for trait anxiety and procedure type.
CONCLUSION: Anxiety levels associated with noninvasive but not after invasive, prenatal diagnostics tests decrease immediately following the procedure.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23966135     DOI: 10.1002/pd.4223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  4 in total

Review 1.  A case-note review of continued pregnancies found to be at a high risk of Huntington's disease: considerations for clinical practice.

Authors:  Felicity Wadrup; Simon Holden; Rhona MacLeod; Zosia Miedzybrodzka; Andrea H Németh; Shan Owens; Sara Pasalodos; Oliver Quarrell; Angus J Clarke
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Women's Experience with Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing and Emotional Well-being and Satisfaction after Test-Results.

Authors:  Rachèl V van Schendel; G C M Lieve Page-Christiaens; Lean Beulen; Caterina M Bilardo; Marjon A de Boer; Audrey B C Coumans; Brigitte H W Faas; Irene M van Langen; Klaske D Lichtenbelt; Merel C van Maarle; Merryn V E Macville; Dick Oepkes; Eva Pajkrt; Lidewij Henneman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Validation of an anxiety scale for prenatal diagnostic procedures.

Authors:  Lucas Kindermann; Jefferson Traebert; Rodrigo Dias Nunes
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.106

4.  Qualitative investigation of the factors that generate ambivalent feelings in women who give birth after receiving negative results from non-invasive prenatal testing.

Authors:  Junko Yotsumoto; Akihiko Sekizawa; Satomi Inoue; Nobuhiro Suzumori; Osamu Samura; Takahiro Yamada; Kiyonori Miura; Hideaki Masuzaki; Hideaki Sawai; Jun Murotsuki; Haruka Hamanoue; Yoshimasa Kamei; Toshiaki Endo; Akimune Fukushima; Yukiko Katagiri; Naoki Takeshita; Masaki Ogawa; Haruki Nishizawa; Yoko Okamoto; Shinya Tairaku; Takashi Kaji; Kazuhisa Maeda; Keiichi Matsubara; Masanobu Ogawa; Hisao Osada; Takashi Ohba; Yukie Kawano; Aiko Sasaki; Haruhiko Sago
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 3.007

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.