Literature DB >> 12786753

Predictive, pre-natal and diagnostic genetic testing for Huntington's disease: the experience in Canada from 1987 to 2000.

S Creighton1, E W Almqvist, D MacGregor, B Fernandez, H Hogg, J Beis, J P Welch, C Riddell, R Lokkesmoe, M Khalifa, J MacKenzie, A Sajoo, S Farrell, F Robert, A Shugar, A Summers, W Meschino, D Allingham-Hawkins, T Chiu, A Hunter, J Allanson, H Hare, J Schween, L Collins, S Sanders, C Greenberg, S Cardwell, E Lemire, P MacLeod, M R Hayden.   

Abstract

Predictive and pre-natal testing for Huntington's Disease (HD) has been available since 1987. Initially this was offered by linkage analysis, which was surpassed by the advent of the direct mutation test for HD in 1993. Direct mutation analysis provided an accurate test that not only enhanced predictive and pre-natal testing, but also permitted the diagnostic testing of symptomatic individuals. The objective of this study was to investigate the uptake, utilization, and outcome of predictive, pre-natal and diagnostic testing in Canada from 1987 to April 1, 2000. A retrospective design was used; all Canadian medical genetics centres and their affiliated laboratories offering genetic testing for HD were invited to participate. A total of 15 of 22 centres (68.2%), currently offering or ever having offered genetic testing for HD, responded, providing data on test results, demographics, and clinical history. A total of 1061 predictive tests, 15 pre-natal tests, and 626 diagnostic tests were performed. The uptake for predictive testing was approximately 18% of the estimated at-risk Canadian population, ranging from 12.5% in the Maritimes to 20.7% in British Columbia. There appears to have been a decline in the rate of testing in recent years. Of the predictive tests, 45.0% of individuals were found to have an increased risk, and a preponderance of females (60.2%) sought testing. A greater proportion of those at < or = 25% risk sought predictive testing once direct CAG mutation analysis had become available (10.9% after mutation analysis vs 4.7% before mutation analysis, p = 0.0077). Very few pre-natal tests were requested. Of the 15 pre-natal tests, 12 had an increased risk, resulting in termination of pregnancy in all but one. Diagnostic testing identified 68.5% of individuals to be positive by mutation analysis, while 31.5% of those with HD-like symptoms were not found to have the HD mutation. The positive diagnostic tests included 24.5% of individuals with no known prior family history of HD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12786753     DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2003.00093.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  46 in total

1.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for Huntington's disease: the experience of three European centres.

Authors:  Maartje C Van Rij; Marjan De Rademaeker; Céline Moutou; Jos C F M Dreesen; Martine De Rycke; Inge Liebaers; Joep P M Geraedts; Christine E M De Die-Smulders; Stéphane Viville
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Reply to Ross' commentary: Reproductive benefit through newborn screening: preferences, policy and ethics.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Fiona A Miller
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  What were you thinking?: individuals at risk for Huntington Disease talk about having children.

Authors:  Kimberly A Quaid; Melinda M Swenson; Sharon L Sims; Joan M Harrison; Carol Moskowitz; Nonna Stepanov; Gregory W Suter; Beryl J Westphal
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Consumers' desire towards current and prospective reproductive genetic testing.

Authors:  Feighanne Hathaway; Esther Burns; Harry Ostrer
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Improvement in strategies for the non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of Huntington disease.

Authors:  M Cristina González-González; Maria Garcia-Hoyos; M Jose Trujillo-Tiebas; A Bustamante Aragonés; M Rodriguez de Alba; D Diego Alvarez; Joaquín Diaz-Recasens; Carmen Ayuso; Carmen Ramos
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  "If It Helps, It's Worth a Try": an Investigation of Perceptions and Attitudes about Genetic Counseling among Southern Manitoba Hutterites.

Authors:  Amber P Gemmell; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Ian MacFarlane; Rachel Riesgraf; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Impact of Huntington Disease Gene-Positive Status on Pre-Symptomatic Young Adults and Recommendations for Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Ping Gong; Joanna H Fanos; Lauren Korty; Carly E Siskind; Andrea K Hanson-Kahn
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Problems assessing uptake of Huntington disease predictive testing and a proposed solution.

Authors:  Roslyn J Tassicker; Betty Teltscher; M Kaye Trembath; Veronica Collins; Leslie J Sheffield; Edmond Chiu; Lyle Gurrin; Martin B Delatycki
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  "Grasping the grey": patient understanding and interpretation of an intermediate allele predictive test result for Huntington disease.

Authors:  A Semaka; L G Balneaves; M R Hayden
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Engagement with genetic discrimination: concerns and experiences in the context of Huntington disease.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Elizabeth Penziner; Oksana Suchowersky; Mark Guttman; Jane S Paulsen; Joan L Bottorff; Michael R Hayden
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.