| Literature DB >> 30886612 |
Mirjam van der Burg1,2, Tomas Kalina3, Martin Perez-Andres4,5, Marcela Vlkova6, Eduardo Lopez-Granados7, Elena Blanco4,5, Carolien Bonroy8, Ana E Sousa9, Anne-Kathrin Kienzler10, Marjolein Wentink1, Ester Mejstríková3, Vendula Šinkorova3, Jan Stuchly3, Menno C van Zelm11, Alberto Orfao4,5, Jacques J M van Dongen1,12.
Abstract
In the rapidly evolving field of primary immunodeficiencies (PID), the EuroFlow consortium decided to develop a PID orientation and screening tube that facilitates fast, standardized, and validated immunophenotypic diagnosis of lymphoid PID, and allows full exchange of data between centers. Our aim was to develop a tool that would be universal for all lymphoid PIDs and offer high sensitivity to identify a lymphoid PID (without a need for specificity to diagnose particular PID) and to guide and prioritize further diagnostic modalities and clinical management. The tube composition has been defined in a stepwise manner through several cycles of design-testing-evaluation-redesign in a multicenter setting. Equally important appeared to be the standardized pre-analytical procedures (sample preparation and instrument setup), analytical procedures (immunostaining and data acquisition), the software analysis (a multidimensional view based on a reference database in Infinicyt software), and data interpretation. This standardized EuroFlow concept has been tested on 250 healthy controls and 99 PID patients with defined genetic defects. In addition, an application of new EuroFlow software tools with multidimensional pattern recognition was designed with inclusion of maturation pathways in multidimensional patterns (APS plots). The major advantage of the EuroFlow approach is that data can be fully exchanged between different laboratories in any country of the world, which is especially of interest for the PID field, with generally low numbers of cases per center.Entities:
Keywords: EuroFlow; automated gating strategy; flow cytometric immunophenotyping; primary immunodeficiencies; standardization
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30886612 PMCID: PMC6410673 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00246
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Composition of the EuroFlow PID Screening tube and information of monoclonal antibodies used in the PID screening tube including volumes, clones, and suppliers.
| CD27 | CD45RA | CD8 | CD16 | CD4 | CD19 | CD3 | CD45 |
| IgD | CD56 | IgM | TCRgd | ||||
| CD3 | APC | SK7 | BD Biosciences | 345767 | 2.5 | ||
| CD4 | PerCPC5.5 | SK3 | BD Biosciences | 332772 | 7 | ||
| CD8 | FITC | SKI | BD Biosciences | 345772 | 5 | ||
| CD16 | PE | 3G8 | BD Biosciences | 555407 | 5 | ||
| CD19 | PECy7 | J3-119 | Beckman Coulter | IM3628 | 5 | ||
| CD27 | BV421 | M-T271 | BD Biosciences | 562513 | 1 | ||
| CD27 alternative | BV421 | O323 | BioLegend | 302823 | 1 | ||
| CD45 | APCH7 | 2D1 | BD Biosciences | 641417 | 2 | ||
| CD45RA | BV510 | HI100 | BD Biosciences | 563031 | 2.5 | ||
| CD45RA alternative | BV510 | HI100 | Biolegend | 304141 | 2.5 | ||
| CD56 | PE | C5.9 | Cytognos | CYT-56PE | 5 | ||
| SmIgD | FITC | IA6-2 | BioLegend | 348205 | 1.25 | ||
| SmIgM | PerCPCy5.5 | MHM-88 | BioLegend | 314511 | 2 | ||
| TCRγδ | PECy7 | 11F2 | BD Biosciences | 649806 | 1 |
Figure 1Flow cytometric analysis of B- and T-cell populations using the EuroFlow PID screening tube, 50 healthy controls are shown in the same plot, median of each gated subset is shown as a circle. (A) After gating leukocytes as CD45+ and lymphocytes on FSc and SSc, the markers CD3, CD19 in combination with TCRγδ and CD16+56 were used to define B-cells (orange); TCRγδ+ T-cells (lilac); TCRγδ- T-cells (blue); and NK cells (brown). (B) The T-cell subsets were further subdivided into naïve (CD27+CD45RA+; dark green), central memory/transitional memory (CM/TM; CD27+CD45RA-; bright green), effector memory (EM; CD27-CD45RA-; green) and terminally differentiated (TD; CD27-CD45RA+; light green) CD4+ T cells and into naïve (CD27+CD45RA+; purple), CM/TM (CD27+CD45RA-; dark blue), EM (CD27-CD45-; pale blue), and TD (CD27-CD45RA+; turqoise) CD8+ T cells. Also, as previously reported (5), some effector CD8+ T-cells showed dim CD27 positivity (EffCD27dim; CD27int-CD45RA+; blue). CD4/CD8 double negative T-cells are indicated in light blue. (C) B-cell subsets could be further subdivided into pre germinal center (PreGC; IgM+IgD+CD27−; orange) unswitched memory B-cells/plasma cells (Unswitched MBC/PC; IgM+IgD+/−CD27+; yellow), switched memory MBC/PC (IgM−IgD−CD27+; pink). (D) Definition and hierarchy of the defined subsets. (E) Multidimensional view (APS view) based on the most discriminating parameters for lymphocytes, B-cell, T-cells, and T-cell subsets.
Figure 2Flow cytometric analysis of B- and T-cell populations using the EuroFlow PIDOT in 250 healthy controls in 14 different age ranges. All values of this reference data set are displayed as bar graphs representing the median, minimum, maximum, and p10, p25, p75, and p90 percentiles. For data visualization package gplot2 for the statistical language R was used (10).
Frequency of patients with inborn errors of immunity showing defects of the major subsets identified in the EF PIDOT, as compared to age-reference values (Summary of Supplementary Tables 2, 3).
| SCID ( | 100% | 100% | 25% | 100% |
| IL2Rg | 6/6 | 6/6 | 5/6 | 6/6 |
| IL7R | 1/1 | 1/1 | 0/1 | 1/1 |
| RAG1 | 8/8 | 8/8 | 1/8 | 8/8 |
| RAG2 | 5/5 | 5/5 | 0/5 | 5/5 |
| DCLRE1C | 3/3 | 3/3 | 0/3 | 3/3 |
| NHEJI | 1/1 | 1/1 | 0/1 | 1/1 |
| CID ( | 58% | 83% | 25% | 100% |
| CD40L | 1/6 | 6/6 | 0/6 | 6/6 |
| ZAP70 | 3/3 | 1/3 | 0/3 | 3/3 |
| DOCK8 | 2/2 | 2/2 | 2/2 | 2/2 |
| BCL10 | 1/1 | 1/1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| CID with syndromic features ( | 70% | 60% | 10% | 75% |
| WASp | 3/3 | 3/3 | 0/3 | 3/3 |
| ATM | 5/6 | 4/6 | 0/6 | 5/6 |
| Di George | 3/6 | 1/6 | 0/6 | 3/6 |
| STAT3 | 1/2 | 2/2 | 1/2 | 2/2 |
| NEMO | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0/2 | 1/2 |
| PNP | 1/1 | 1/1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| PAD ( | 31% | 100% | 25% | 100% |
| BTK | 1/10 | 10/10 | 1/10 | 10/10 |
| PIK3CD | 4/5 | 5/5 | 3/5 | 5/5 |
| AID | 0/1 | 1/1 | 0/1 | 1/1 |
| Disease of immune dysregulation ( | 70% | 60% | 10% | 90% |
| Syntaxin | 1/1 | 1/1 | 0/1 | 1/1 |
| FAS | 5/5 | 2/5 | 1/5 | 5/5 |
| XLP | 0/1 | 1/1 | 0/1 | 1/1 |
| CD27 | 1/1 | 1/1 | 0/1 | 1/1 |
| CTPS1 | 0/2 | 1/2 | 0/2 | 1/2 |
| Defects of phagocytes or function ( | 30% | 60% | 40% | 70% |
| CGD | 1/5 | 3/5 | 1/5 | 3/5 |
| GATA2 | 2/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 4/5 |
| Defects innate immunity ( | 67% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| STAT1 | 1/1 | 1/1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| WHIM | 1/1 | 1/1 | 0/1 | 1/1 |
| IRAK4 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| Complement deficiencies ( | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Results expressed as percentage of patients showing absolute counts below the lower limit of normality, compared to age-reference values obtained from 250 healthy donors analyzed with the same protocol. SCID, Severe Combined Immunodeficiency; CID, Combined Immunodeficiency; PAD, Predominantly Antibody Deficiency.
Figure 3Flowcytometric analysis of B- and T-cell populations using the EuroFlow PID screening tube on controls and patients with SCID. From the top down, APS plots of gated lymphocytes, B-cells, CD3+ T cells and TCRgd- T cells are shown. Lines depict a 2 standard deviation boundary of all controls combined. (A) Multidimensional views of all lymphocyte subsets of a newborn, an infant, one Artemis-deficient and four RAG-deficient SCID patients. (B) Multidimensional views of all lymphocyte subsets of a newborn, one IL7RA-deficient, three IL2RG-deficient and a ZAP70-deficient patient.
Figure 4Multidimensional views of all lymphocyte subsets in healthy controls and PID patients. (A) Multidimensional views of all lymphocyte subsets of two BTK-deficient patients, a CD40L deficiency, a patient with ALPS due to a mutation in FAS and healthy infants of 6 months and 3 years. (B) Multidimensional views of all lymphocyte subsets of single examples of patients with Wiskott Aldrich syndrome (WASp), Ataxia Telangiectasia (ATM), DOCK8 deficiency and two patients with DiGeorge syndrome.
Figure 5Multidimensional views of all lymphocyte subsets in combination with the absolute values of all subpopulations plotted as red dots in the age-matched reference bar graphs after automated analysis. (APDS) Patients with activated PI3K delta syndrome (APDS). (GATA2) Patient with GATA2 deficiency.