| Literature DB >> 32265901 |
Tomas Kalina1, Marina Bakardjieva1, Maartje Blom2, Martin Perez-Andres3, Barbara Barendregt4, Veronika Kanderová1, Carolien Bonroy5,6, Jan Philippé5,6, Elena Blanco3, Ingrid Pico-Knijnenburg2,4, Jitse H M P Paping2, Beata Wolska-Kuśnierz7, Malgorzata Pac7, Jakub Tkazcyk8, Filomeen Haerynck9, Himmet Haluk Akar10, Renata Formánková1, Tomáš Freiberger11,12, Michael Svatoň1, Anna Šedivá13, Sonia Arriba-Méndez14, Alberto Orfao3, Jacques J M van Dongen15, Mirjam van der Burg2,4.
Abstract
The EuroFlow PID consortium developed a set of flow cytometry tests for evaluation of patients with suspicion of primary immunodeficiency (PID). In this technical report we evaluate the performance of the SCID-RTE tube that explores the presence of recent thymic emigrants (RTE) together with T-cell activation status and maturation stages and discuss its applicability in the context of the broader EuroFlow PID flow cytometry testing algorithm for diagnostic orientation of PID of the lymphoid system. We have analyzed peripheral blood cells of 26 patients diagnosed between birth and 2 years of age with a genetically defined primary immunodeficiency disorder: 15 severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) patients had disease-causing mutations in RAG1 or RAG2 (n = 4, two of them presented with Omenn syndrome), IL2RG (n = 4, one of them with confirmed maternal engraftment), NHEJ1 (n = 1), CD3E (n = 1), ADA (n = 1), JAK3 (n = 3, two of them with maternal engraftment) and DCLRE1C (n = 1) and 11 other PID patients had diverse molecular defects [ZAP70 (n = 1), WAS (n = 2), PNP (n = 1), FOXP3 (n = 1), del22q11.2 (DiGeorge n = 4), CDC42 (n = 1) and FAS (n = 1)]. In addition, 44 healthy controls in the same age group were analyzed using the SCID-RTE tube in four EuroFlow laboratories using a standardized 8-color approach. RTE were defined as CD62L+CD45RO-HLA-DR-CD31+ and the activation status was assessed by the expression of HLA-DR+. Naïve CD8+ T-lymphocytes and naïve CD4+ T-lymphocytes were defined as CD62L+CD45RO-HLA-DR-. With the SCID-RTE tube, we identified patients with PID by low levels or absence of RTE in comparison to controls as well as low levels of naïve CD4+ and naïve CD8+ lymphocytes. These parameters yielded 100% sensitivity for SCID. All SCID patients had absence of RTE, including the patients with confirmed maternal engraftment or oligoclonally expanded T-cells characteristic for Omenn syndrome. Another dominant finding was the increased numbers of activated CD4+HLA-DR+ and CD8+HLA-DR+ lymphocytes. Therefore, the EuroFlow SCID-RTE tube together with the previously published PIDOT tube form a sensitive and complete cytometric diagnostic test suitable for patients suspected of severe PID (SCID or CID) as well as for children identified via newborn screening programs for SCID with low or absent T-cell receptor excision circles (TRECs).Entities:
Keywords: EuroFlow; diagnosis; flow cytometric immunophenotyping; primary immunodeficiencies (PID); severe combined immune deficiency (SCID); standardization
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32265901 PMCID: PMC7096355 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00371
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Characteristics of patients, WBC and lymphocytes subsets (TBNK) reported by the referring clinician (x 10e3/μl).
| SCID | Case_1 | F | SCID, CD3E deficiency | CD3E exon 6 c.173delT | p.Leu58HisfsX9 | 13.9 | 0.32 | 2.6 | 1.4 | 0.3 |
| SCID | Case_2 | M | SCID, ADA deficiency | ADA exon 4 homozygous c.302G > A | p.Arg101Gln | 2.5 | 0.03 | 0 | 0.01 | 1.3 |
| SCID | Case_3 | M | SCID, JAK3 deficiency with mat.engr. | JAK3 heterozygous c.561delT, c.2066C > T | p.Val188SerfsX14, p.Pro689Leu | 11.8 | 6.31 | 3.02 | 0.02 | 1.8 |
| SCID | Case_4 | F | SCID, JAK3 deficiency | JAK3 exon 12 homozygoot c.1765G > A (NM_000215) | p.Gly589Ser | 6.5 | 0.03 | 0.8 | 0.08 | 0 |
| SCID | Case_5 | F | SCID, JAK3 deficiency with mat.engr. | JAK3 exon 5 c.578G > A, exon 19 c.2712C > A | p.Cys193Tyr | 15.5 | 1.68 | 0.37 | 0.1 | 0.2 |
| SCID | Case_6 | M | SCID, Cernunnos/XLF deficiency | NHEJ1 exon 5 homozygoot c.532C > T | p.Arg178X | 3.4 | 0.22 | 0.04 | 0 | 0.9 |
| SCID | Case_7 | F | SCID, Artemis deficiency | DCLRE1C c.1A > C c.401C > G (compound heterozygote) | M1V, T134R (Met1Val, Thr134Arg) | 3.6 | 0.00132 | 0 | 0.0018 | 0.4 |
| SCID | Case_8 | M | SCID, RAG2 deficiency | RAG2 homozygous c.1280_1281insTGGATAT | p.Asn428GlyfsX12 | 33.1 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 1.61 | 0.2 |
| SCID | Case_9 | M | SCID, RAG2 deficiency | RAG2 c.107G > A | p.Trp36* | 2.8 | 0.04236 | 0.0444 | 0.0678 | 0.2 |
| SCID | Case_10 | M | Omenn syndrome, RAG1 deficiency | RAG1 c.983G > A/c.1186C > T (compound heterozygote) | pCys328Tyr/pArg396Cys | 27.9 | 6.767 | 0.0303 | 1.818 | 0 |
| SCID | Case_11 | M | Omenn syndrome, RAG1 deficiency | RAG1 exon 2 c.519del | p.Glu174Serfs*27 | 8.05 | 2.15 | 0 | 0.429 | 0.3 |
| SCID | Case_12 | M | SCID, IL2RG deficiency with mat.engr. | IL2RG c.270-1G > A | n.d. | 3.6 | 0.04 | 0.57 | 0 | 0.7 |
| SCID | Case_13 | M | SCID, IL2RG deficiency | IL2RG c.613G > A | p. Trp174* | 9.5 | 0.001045 | 0.22325 | 0.022895 | 0.7 |
| SCID | Case_14 | M | SCID, IL2RG deficiency with mat.engr. | IL2RG c.269+3A > T | n.d. | 5.4 | 0.6804 | 0.783 | 0.00891 | 0.5 |
| SCID | Case_15 | M | SCID, IL2RG deficiency | IL2RG exon 5 hemizygoot c.595-1G > T | n.d. | 8.6 | 0 | 0.6 | 0.02 | 0.3 |
| other PID | Case_16 | M | CID, PNP deficiency | PNP c.700C > T | p.Arg234X | 6.1 | 0.5 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 1.6 |
| other PID | Case_17 | M | ZAP70 deficiency | ZAP70 exon 10 homozygoot c.1193C > T | p.Ile398Ser | 11.3 | 2.18 | 1.03 | 0.17 | 0.6 |
| other PID | Case_18 | M | Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome | WAS c. 1271_1295del | p.Gly424Glufs*13 | 8.4 | 1.47 | 0.95 | 0.25 | 0.3 |
| other PID | Case_19 | M | Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome | WAS c.344A > G | p.His115Arg | 4 | 1.271 | 0.4305 | 0.3075 | 1.1 |
| other PID | Case_20 | M | Complete DiGeorge syndorme | del22q11.2 | 6.7 | 0.48776 | 0.003819 | 0.1206 | 1.6 | |
| other PID | Case_21 | F | Complete DiGeorge syndorme | del22q11.2 | 5.1 | 0.00126684 | 0.655 | 0.504 | 0.2 | |
| other PID | Case_22 | F | DiGeorge syndrome | del22q11.2 | 9.9 | 0.914354 | 1.342852 | 1.008826 | 0.6 | |
| other PID | Case_23 | M | DiGeorge syndrome | del22q11.2 | 6.7 | 0.97 | 1.29 | 0.7 | 0.3 | |
| other PID | Case_24 | M | Takenouchi-Kosaki syndrome | CDC42 c.191A > G | p.Tyr64Cys | 2.4 | 0.436 | 0.094 | 0.094 | 1.5 |
| other PID | Case_25 | M | IPEX syndrome | FOXP3 c.721T > C | S241P (p.Ser241Pro) | 15.135 | 2.42353 | 1.013115 | 0.349624 | 0.2 |
| other PID | Case_26 | M | Autoimmune lymphoproliferative sy | FAS exon 7 heterozygous (frameshift) | n.d. | 29.8 | 20.818 | 2.146 | 0.226 | 0.3 |
Composition of the EuroFlow SCID-RTE tube.
| CD3 | APC | SK7 | BD Biosciences | 345767 | 2.5 |
| CD4 | BV510 | OKT4 | Biolegend | 317443 | 1.5 |
| CD8 | APC-Alexa750 | B9.11 | Beckman Coulter | A94683 | 1.5 |
| CD31 | PE | MEM-05 | Exbio | 1P-273-T100 | 5 |
| CD45RO | FITC | UCHL1 | Exbio | 1F-498-T100 | 10 |
| CD62L | BV421 | DREG-56 | Biolegend | 304827 | 2 |
| HLA-DR | PerCP-Cy5.5 | L243 | Biolegend | 307629 | 1.5 |
| TCRγδ | PE-Cy7 | 11F2 | BD Biosciences | 649806 | 2.5 |
Both the SCID-RTE tube and the PIDOT tube have originally be designed for application in 8-color format. However, because of their strong complementarity, it can be efficient and cost-effective to use a 12-color “combined PIDOT & SCID-RTE variant” by supplementing the PIDOT tube with the CD45RO, CD31, HLA-DR, and CD62L markers.
Lymphocytes subsets evaluated by SCID-RTE tube.
| Case_1 | CD3E | SCID | 0 | 0 | 93 | 12 | ||||||||||||||
| Case_2 | ADA | SCID | 55 | 2 | 83 | 14 | ||||||||||||||
| Case_3 | JAK3 | SCID | 69 | 5,610 | 1 | 67 | 94 | 5,256 | ||||||||||||
| Case_4 | JAK3 | SCID | 3 | 0 | 85 | 12 | ||||||||||||||
| Case_5 | JAK3 | SCID | 80 | 2,247 | 0 | 4 | 98 | 2,202 | 19 | |||||||||||
| Case_6 | XLF | SCID | 263 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||
| Case_7 | Artemis | SCID | 46 | 28 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
| Case_8 | RAG2 | SCID | 1 | 1 | 71 | 26 | ||||||||||||||
| Case_9 | RAG2 | SCID | 5 | 4 | 86 | 44 | 3 | |||||||||||||
| Case_10 | RAG1 | SCID | 68 | 4,621 | 3 | 158 | 1,964 | 44 | 2,024 | |||||||||||
| Case_11 | RAG1 | SCID | 69 | 6 | 109 | 88 | 1,690 | 53 | ||||||||||||
| Case_12 | IL2RG | SCID | 0 | 0 | 71 | 28 | 61 | 20 | ||||||||||||
| Case_13 | IL2RG | SCID | 5 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
| Case_14 | IL2RG | SCID | 171 | 23 | ||||||||||||||||
| Case_15 | IL2RG | SCID | 0 | 58 | ||||||||||||||||
| Case_16 | PNP | other PID | 63 | 3 | 7 | 37 | ||||||||||||||
| Case_17 | ZAP70 | other PID | 3 | 47 | 89 | 1,482 | 9 | |||||||||||||
| Case_18 | WAS | other PID | 4 | 41 | 82 | 82 | 3 | 23 | 3 | 4 | ||||||||||
| Case_19 | WAS | other PID | 57 | 271 | 38 | 376 | ||||||||||||||
| Case_20 | del22q11.2 | other PID | 122 | 21 | 6 | |||||||||||||||
| Case_21 | del22q11.2 | other PID | 0 | 70 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
| Case_22 | del22q11.2 | other PID | 138 | 65 | 22 | 344 | 87 | 300 | 56 | 4 | 14 | |||||||||
| Case_23 | del22q11.2 | other PID | 63 | 65 | 22 | 72 | 87 | 20 | 4 | 7 | ||||||||||
| Case_24 | CDC42 | other PID | 63 | 180 | 23 | 10 | 22 | |||||||||||||
| Case_25 | FOXP3 | other PID | 61 | 1 | 22 | 70 | 22 | 363 | 81 | 295 | 48 | 5 | 19 | |||||||
| Case_26 | FAS | other PID | 86 | 12,833 | 3 | 3,324 | 15 | 1,912 | 58 | 1,938 | 81 | 2,692 | 92 | 1,761 | 5 | |||||
| 5th percentile | 0.7 | 20 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
| 95th percentile | 86 | 6,626 | 82 | 4,094 | 35 | 2,204 | 86 | 2,393 | 96 | 3,149 | 96 | 1,614 | ||||||||
| Sensitivity other PID | 55% | 91% | 55% | 20% | 55% | 82% | 27% | 64% | 91% | 91% | 73% | 91% | 64% | 73% | 90% | 40% | 55% | 27% | ||
| Sensitivity SCID | 67% | 80% | 33% | 60% | 60% | 80% | 53% | 87% | 50% | 33% | ||||||||||
Absolute counts (abs) as 10e3/μl. Values outside the normal range are in bold. Range obtained in controls (5th and 95th percentile) is given below the table. Sensitivity to disclose abnormal values in other PID and SCID group is given for each measurement in the bottom two rows. Most informative parameters are highlighted in gray.
Figure 1Gating T-cell subsets and generation of a reference principal component analysis representation in an n-dimensional space for SCID-RTE tube. (A) After gating T-cells as CD3+ and FSClo and SSClo, the markers TCRγδ+, in combination with CD4 and CD8 were used to define TCRγδ+ T-cells (light blue), CD4+CD8-TCRγδ- T-cells (pink); CD4-CD8+TCRγδ- T-cells (dark blue) and CD4-CD8- TCRγδ- double negative T-cells (green). (B) The CD4+ T-cell subsets were further subdivided into recent thymic emigrants (RTE; CD62L+CD45RO-HLDR-CD31+; red), naïve (CD62L+CD45RO-HLDR-CD31-; purple), central memory (CM; CD62L+CD45RO+HLDR-; orchid), effector memory CD45RO+ (EMRO+; CD62L-CD45RO+HLDR-; mauve), effector memory CD45RO- (EMRO-; CD62L-CD45RO-HLDR-; pink) and activated memory (CD45RO+HLDR+; burgundy) CD4+ T cells. (C) The CD8+ T-cell maturation subsets were further subdivided into naïve (CD62L+CD45RO-HLDR-; blue), central memory (CM; CD62L+CD45RO+HLDR-; blue-green), effector memory CD45RO+ (EMRO+; CD62L-CD45RO+HLDR-; periwinkle blue), effector memory CD45RO- (EMRO-; CD62L-CD45RO-HLDR-; cyan) and activated memory (CD45RO+HLDR+; navy blue) CD8+ T cells. (D) Definition and hierarchy of the defined subsets. (E) Principal component analysis representation (APS view) based on the most discriminating parameters for T-cell populations, and CD4+ T-cells and CD8+ T-cell subsets.
Figure 2PCA representation of SCID-RTE tube results, showing the distinct blood T-cell subsets in the supervised PCA analysis of blood samples from healthy donors of different age (A) and SCID and CID patients (B). From the top down, APS plots of gated total, CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells are shown. Lines depict a 2 standard deviation boundary of all controls combined. (A) PCA (APS views) of all T-cell subsets of cord blood and peripheral blood from donors of different age. (B) PCA (APS views) of all T-cell subsets of the following patients: a IL2RG-deficient patient, a JAK3-deficient patient with maternal engraftment, a RAG1-deficient Omenn syndrome, a ZAP70-deficient patient, a PNP-deficient patient, a complete DiGeorge syndrome, a Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome (WAS) and an autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS) patient.
Figure 3Flow cytometric analysis of T-cell populations using the EuroFlow SCID/RTE tube in 56 healthy controls of five different age ranges. All values of this reference data set are displayed as bar graphs representing the median, and p10, p25, p75, and p90 percentiles. For data visualization package gplot2 for the statistical language R was used.
Figure 4T-cell subset counts determined using the EuroFlow SCID-RTE tube. (A) Absolute values of CD3+ T-cells, RTE CD4+ cells, naïve CD4+ or CD8+ T-cells. (B) Relative values of activated T-cells based on the expression of HLA-DR molecule on CD4+ T-cells (HLA-DR+CD4+) or CD8+ T-cells (HLA-DR+CD4+). SCID patients (n = 15) are represented as red circles where open circles show patients with maternal engraftment, other PID patients (n = 11) as orange squares and healthy controls (n = 44) as gray triangles. Detailed gating strategy is shown in Supplemental Figure 1. ***P ≤ 0.0005.
Figure 5Correlation between the SCID-RTE and the PIDOT tube in determining the levels of naïve CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell subsets in PID patients. (A) Absolute counts or (B) Relative counts for each PID patient (n = 24) of naïve CD4+ T-cells (blue) and naïve CD8+ T-cells (green) measured by the SCID-RTE tube (x axis) and the PIDOT tube (y axis). SCID (closed circles), other PID (open circles) patients. Detailed gating strategy is shown in Supplemental Figure 1.