Zohar Shamash1, Marina Catallozzi2, Peter S Dayan1, Lauren S Chernick1. 1. From the Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medical Center. 2. Division of Child and Adolescent Health, Departments of Pediatrics and Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Expedited partner therapy (EPT) refers to treating sexual partners of patients with sexually transmitted infections by providing prescriptions or medications to give to their partners. Expedited partner therapy is not routinely prescribed in the emergency department (ED). Our objective was to explore adolescent preferences for EPT use in the ED. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study using surveys and semistructured interviews in one urban ED. Sexually active patients aged 15 to 19 years completed an anonymous survey eliciting (1) sexual history and risky sexual behaviors, (2) preferences for partner notification when hypothetically testing positive for an STI, and (3) preferences for EPT. A subsample of survey respondents participated in the interviews, which were conducted until no new perspectives emerged. Investigators analyzed interviews using thematic analysis. RESULTS: A total of 247 participants completed surveys; the majority were female (183/247, 74%), Hispanic (209/243, 86%), and did not use a condom at last intercourse (129/243, 53%). Two thirds of participants (152/236, 64%) did not prefer EPT for partner notification. Preference for EPT was not associated with sex, age, ethnicity, condom use, a steady sexual partner, or STI history. Qualitative data from both surveys and interviews revealed the following reasons for not preferring EPT: concern for partner safety, importance of determining partner STI status, perceived benefit of clinical interaction, and partner accountability. Reasons for preferring EPT included increased treatment accessibility and convenience. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of adolescent patients in a pediatric ED did not prefer EPT. Emergency department practitioners should address common concerns regarding EPT to increase EPT adherence if prescribed.
OBJECTIVES: Expedited partner therapy (EPT) refers to treating sexual partners of patients with sexually transmitted infections by providing prescriptions or medications to give to their partners. Expedited partner therapy is not routinely prescribed in the emergency department (ED). Our objective was to explore adolescent preferences for EPT use in the ED. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study using surveys and semistructured interviews in one urban ED. Sexually active patients aged 15 to 19 years completed an anonymous survey eliciting (1) sexual history and risky sexual behaviors, (2) preferences for partner notification when hypothetically testing positive for an STI, and (3) preferences for EPT. A subsample of survey respondents participated in the interviews, which were conducted until no new perspectives emerged. Investigators analyzed interviews using thematic analysis. RESULTS: A total of 247 participants completed surveys; the majority were female (183/247, 74%), Hispanic (209/243, 86%), and did not use a condom at last intercourse (129/243, 53%). Two thirds of participants (152/236, 64%) did not prefer EPT for partner notification. Preference for EPT was not associated with sex, age, ethnicity, condom use, a steady sexual partner, or STI history. Qualitative data from both surveys and interviews revealed the following reasons for not preferring EPT: concern for partner safety, importance of determining partner STI status, perceived benefit of clinical interaction, and partner accountability. Reasons for preferring EPT included increased treatment accessibility and convenience. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of adolescent patients in a pediatric ED did not prefer EPT. Emergency department practitioners should address common concerns regarding EPT to increase EPT adherence if prescribed.
Authors: Daniel A Handel; Rongwei Fu; Mohamud Daya; Jodie York; Eric Larson; K John McConnell Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Nancy D Brener; Laura Kann; Steven A Kinchen; Jo Anne Grunbaum; Laura Whalen; Danice Eaton; Joseph Hawkins; James G Ross Journal: MMWR Recomm Rep Date: 2004-09-24
Authors: Ana Radovic; Gale R Burstein; Michael P Marshal; Pamela J Murray; Elizabeth Miller; Gina S Sucato Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Michelle L Pickett; Marlene D Melzer-Lange; Melissa K Miller; Seema Menon; Alexis M Vistocky; Amy L Drendel Journal: Pediatr Emerg Care Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 1.454
Authors: Jessica L Morris; Sheri A Lippman; Susan Philip; Kyle Bernstein; Torsten B Neilands; Marguerita Lightfoot Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Jennifer L Reed; Jill S Huppert; Gordon L Gillespie; Regina G Taylor; Carolyn K Holland; Evaline A Alessandrini; Jessica A Kahn Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2014-12-24 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Ralph J DiClemente; Teaniese L Davis; Andrea Swartzendruber; Amy M Fasula; Lorin Boyce; Deborah Gelaude; Simone C Gray; James Hardin; Eve Rose; Monique Carry; Jessica M Sales; Jennifer L Brown; Michelle Staples-Horne Journal: Women Health Date: 2014
Authors: Lauren S Chernick; Thomas H Chun; Rachel Richards; Julie R Bromberg; Fahd A Ahmad; Brett McAninch; Colette Mull; Rohit Shenoi; Brian Suffoletto; Charlie Casper; James Linakis; Anthony Spirito Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2019-11-22 Impact factor: 3.451