OBJECTIVES: Important barriers to addressing the sexually transmitted infection (STI) epidemic among adolescents are the inadequate partner notification of positive STI results and insufficient rates of partner testing and treatment. However, adolescent attitudes regarding partner notification and treatment are not well understood. The aim was to qualitatively explore the barriers to and preferences for partner notification and treatment among adolescent males and females tested for STIs in an emergency department (ED) setting and to explore the acceptability of ED personnel notifying their sexual partners. METHODS: This was a descriptive, qualitative study in which a convenience sample of 40 adolescents (18 females, 22 males) 14 to 21 years of age who presented to either adult or pediatric EDs with STI-related complaints participated. Individualized, semistructured, confidential interviews were administered to each participant. Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim by an independent transcriptionist. Data were analyzed using framework analysis. RESULTS: Barriers to partner notification included fear of retaliation or loss of the relationship, lack of understanding of or concern for the consequences associated with an STI, and social stigma and embarrassment. Participants reported two primary barriers to their partners obtaining STI testing and treatment: lack of transportation to the health care site and the partner's fear of STI positive test results. Most participants preferred to notify their main sexual partners of an STI exposure via a face-to-face interaction or a phone call. Most participants were agreeable with a health care provider (HCP) notifying their main sexual partners of STI exposure and preferred that the HCP notify the partner by phone call. CONCLUSIONS: There are several adolescent preferences and barriers for partner notification and treatment. To be most effective, future interventions to prevent adolescent STIs should incorporate these preferences and address the barriers to partner notification. In an ED setting, using HCPs to provide partner notification of STI exposures is acceptable to adolescent patients; however, the feasibility of this type of program needs further exploration.
OBJECTIVES: Important barriers to addressing the sexually transmitted infection (STI) epidemic among adolescents are the inadequate partner notification of positive STI results and insufficient rates of partner testing and treatment. However, adolescent attitudes regarding partner notification and treatment are not well understood. The aim was to qualitatively explore the barriers to and preferences for partner notification and treatment among adolescent males and females tested for STIs in an emergency department (ED) setting and to explore the acceptability of ED personnel notifying their sexual partners. METHODS: This was a descriptive, qualitative study in which a convenience sample of 40 adolescents (18 females, 22 males) 14 to 21 years of age who presented to either adult or pediatric EDs with STI-related complaints participated. Individualized, semistructured, confidential interviews were administered to each participant. Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim by an independent transcriptionist. Data were analyzed using framework analysis. RESULTS: Barriers to partner notification included fear of retaliation or loss of the relationship, lack of understanding of or concern for the consequences associated with an STI, and social stigma and embarrassment. Participants reported two primary barriers to their partners obtaining STI testing and treatment: lack of transportation to the health care site and the partner's fear of STI positive test results. Most participants preferred to notify their main sexual partners of an STI exposure via a face-to-face interaction or a phone call. Most participants were agreeable with a health care provider (HCP) notifying their main sexual partners of STI exposure and preferred that the HCP notify the partner by phone call. CONCLUSIONS: There are several adolescent preferences and barriers for partner notification and treatment. To be most effective, future interventions to prevent adolescent STIs should incorporate these preferences and address the barriers to partner notification. In an ED setting, using HCPs to provide partner notification of STI exposures is acceptable to adolescent patients; however, the feasibility of this type of program needs further exploration.
Authors: R Brugha; M Balfe; R M Conroy; E Clarke; M Fitzgerald; E O'Connell; I Jeffares; D Vaughan; C Fleming; D O'Donovan Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: M R Decker; E Miller; H L McCauley; D J Tancredi; R R Levenson; J Waldman; P Schoenwald; J G Silverman Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: Jennifer L Reed; Lauren Simendinger; Sarah Griffeth; Hye Grace Kim; Jill S Huppert Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2009-10-12 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Gina M Secura; Fidel A Desir; Jennifer L Mullersman; Tessa Madden; Jenifer E Allsworth; Jeffrey F Peipert Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Natasha L Pavlin; Rhian M Parker; Anna K Piggin; Carol A Hopkins; Meredith J Temple-Smith; Christopher K Fairley; Jane E Tomnay; Francis J Bowden; Darren B Russell; Jane S Hocking; Marian K Pitts; Marcus Y Chen Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2010-09-20 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Marielle Goyette; Beatrice Muthoni Wamuti; Mercy Owuor; David Bukusi; Peter Mutiti Maingi; Felix Abuna Otieno; Peter Cherutich; Anne Ng'ang'a; Carey Farquhar Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Jacob J van den Berg; Marjan Javanbakht; Pamina M Gorbach; Bret J Rudy; Andrew O Westfall; Craig M Wilson; Michelle A Lally Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Melissa K Miller; Lauren S Chernick; Monika K Goyal; Jennifer L Reed; Fahd A Ahmad; Erin F Hoehn; Michelle S Pickett; Kristin Stukus; Cynthia J Mollen Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2019-07-26 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Jennifer L Reed; Brittany E Punches; Regina G Taylor; Maurizio Macaluso; Evaline A Alessandrini; Jessica A Kahn Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2017-05-27 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Arlene M Butz; Charlotte Gaydos; Shang-En Chung; Betty H Johnson; Steven Huettner; Maria Trent Journal: Clin Pediatr (Phila) Date: 2016-08-08 Impact factor: 1.168
Authors: Brian M J W van der Veer; Christian J P A Hoebe; Nicole H T M Dukers-Muijrers; Lieke B van Alphen; Petra F G Wolffs Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Rosanna W Peeling; David Mabey; Mary L Kamb; Xiang-Sheng Chen; Justin D Radolf; Adele S Benzaken Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2017-10-12 Impact factor: 52.329