Literature DB >> 20536803

The use of scripting at triage and its impact on elopements.

Daniel A Handel1, Rongwei Fu, Mohamud Daya, Jodie York, Eric Larson, K John McConnell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to measure the effect of scripting language at triage on the likelihood of elopements, controlling for patient volume and other potential confounding variables.
METHODS: This was a pre- and postintervention cohort study using the same 5-month period (November 2007-March 2008 and November 2008-March 2009, respectively) that included in the analysis all patients 21 years of age and older, who presented to the triage window in the emergency department (ED) waiting room (not by ambulance). As part of the scripting, triage nurses informed patients of the longest waiting time (at that point in time) for any patients still waiting to be brought back from the waiting room into the ED. Rates of elopement were compared between patients who did and did not receive the scripting, controlling for individual and daily ED variables.
RESULTS: A total of 24,390 ED visits were included in this analysis. The elopement rate was 4.4% among ED patients in the prescripting period, compared to 2.3% in the postscripting period. In a multivariate logistic regression model, the use of scripting was significantly associated with decreased odds of elopement, compared to the nonscripting group (odds ratio [OR] = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.46 to 0.80).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of triage scripting was found to significantly reduce elopement rates in patients placed in the ED waiting room, even after controlling for other confounding variables. Scripting is a simple and underutilized technique that can have a positive effect for patients and the ED.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20536803     DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00721.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  6 in total

1.  "Just Getting a Cup of Coffee"-Considering Best Practices for Patients' Movement off the Hospital Floor.

Authors:  Sara Stream; David Alfandre
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 2.960

2.  Impact of an expeditor on emergency department patient throughput.

Authors:  Daniel A Handel; O John Ma; Judi Workman; Rongwei Fu
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2011-05

3.  Preferences for Expedited Partner Therapy Among Adolescents in an Urban Pediatric Emergency Department: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Zohar Shamash; Marina Catallozzi; Peter S Dayan; Lauren S Chernick
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 1.602

4.  Medical student use of communication elements and association with patient satisfaction: a prospective observational pilot study.

Authors:  Joseph S Turner; Katie E Pettit; Bryce B Buente; Aloysius J Humbert; Anthony J Perkins; Jeffrey A Kline
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Physician communication coaching effects on patient experience.

Authors:  Adrianne Seiler; Alexander Knee; Reham Shaaban; Christine Bryson; Jasmine Paadam; Rohini Harvey; Satoko Igarashi; Christopher LaChance; Evan Benjamin; Tara Lagu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effect of an Educational Intervention on Medical Student Scripting and Patient Satisfaction: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Katie E Pettit; Joseph S Turner; Katherine A Pollard; Bryce B Buente; Aloysius J Humbert; Anthony J Perkins; Cherri D Hobgood; Jeffrey A Kline
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-03-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.