| Literature DB >> 30871081 |
Sujan Gautam1, Hyoung-Sun Jeong2.
Abstract
This study aims to identify the relationship of women's autonomy and intimate partner violence (IPV) with maternal healthcare service utilization among married women of reproductive age in Nepal. This study used data from the 2016 Nepal Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS), which is a nationally representative sample survey. The association between outcome variables with selected factors were examined by using the Chi-square test (χ²), followed by multiple logistic regression. The sample was adjusted for multi-stage sampling design, cluster weight, and sample weight. Of the total sample, 68.4% reported attending sufficient Antenatal care (ANC) visits throughout their pregnancy, while 59.9% reported having a health facility delivery. The factors associated with both, sufficient ANC visits and institutional delivery includes ethnicity, place of residence, household wealth status, and the number of living children. Women who have access to media, and who have intended pregnancy were more likely to have sufficient ANC visits. Exposure to some forms of violence was found to be the barrier for maternal health service utilization. Attending ANC visits enables mothers to make the decision regarding skilled attendance or health facility delivery. Preventing any forms of violence need to be considered as a vital element in interventions aimed at increasing maternal health service utilization.Entities:
Keywords: Nepal; antenatal care; institutional delivery; intimate partner violence; maternal health service utilization; women’s autonomy
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30871081 PMCID: PMC6427435 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16050895
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Measurement of outcome variables.
| Outcome Variables | Measurements |
|---|---|
| Sufficient Antenatal Care (ANC) visits | This factor was assessed in the study as a dichotomous variable created from the continuous measure of the number of ANC visits during pregnancy, grouped as Sufficient ANC visits (four or more); and Insufficient ANC visits (less than four, which also includes no ANC visits). Four or more ANC visits was considered as Sufficient ANC visits based on the standard recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) [ |
| Delivery in a health facility (institutional delivery) | Delivery in a health facility (institutional delivery was assessed as a dichotomous variable categorized as: Institutional delivery (when the delivery was done at public, private or non-governmental health facilities); and No institutional delivery (when the delivery took place at home and others). This binary outcome variable was chosen instead of ‘skilled assistance during delivery’ to stress the utilization of institutional delivery services [ |
Measurement of Explanatory Variables.
| Explanatory Variable | Definition and Measurement |
|---|---|
| Age group (in years) | Self-reported age of women at the time of the survey, grouped into: 15–24 years; 25–34 years; and 35–49 years. |
| Ethnicity | Self-reported ethnic affiliation of respondents grouped into: Brahmin/Chhetri (Hill Brahmin/Chhetri, Terai Brahmin/Chhetri); Janajati (Newar, Hill/Terai Janajati); Dalit (Hill/Terai Dalit); and Other castes (all other ethnicities). |
| Place of residence | Types of place of residence: Urban or Rural |
| Household wealth status | A composite index of household possessions, assets, and amenities, derived using principal component analysis, grouped as: Poor (Poorest and Poorer); Middle; and Rich (Richer and Richest). |
| Education differences | The highest level of education attained by respondent and her husband/partner collected as No Education, Primary, Secondary, and Higher redefined as education differences between respondent and her husband, grouped into: Both uneducated; Both equally educated; Husband better educated; and, Wife better educated. |
| No of living children | The number of living children grouped as: 2 or fewer children; and, 3 or more children |
| Employment status | Employment status classified according to the self-report of types of earning from respondent’s work, grouped into: Unemloyed; Employed but not for cash (paid as In-kind only); Employed for cash (paid as cash only or/and cash and in-kind). |
| Exposure to any media (at least once a week) | A composite variable derived from the frequency of access to newspaper/magazine, radio and/or television, at least once a week, grouped as: No exposure; Exposure (exposure to any media at least once a week) |
| Decision-making autonomy | A composite variable measured from women’s participation (alone or with husband) in making three household decisions (access to health care; large household purchases; and freedom to visit families and relatives), grouped into, low autonomy (No participation in any decision making); Medium autonomy (Participation in 1–2 decision making); High autonomy (Participation in all 3-decision making) |
| Attitudes towards partner violence | A composite variable reflecting women’s attitudes towards wife beating by their husband for each of the following five reasons (goes out without telling her husband; neglects the children; argues with husband; refuses to have sex with husband; and burns the food), grouped as: Accepts violence fully (wife beating justified for 3–5 reasons); Accepts violence partially (beating justified for 1–2 reasons); Rejects violence (Beating not justified for any reasons) |
| Pregnancy intentions | A dichotomous variable reflecting the women’s pregnancy intentions for the last birth, grouped as: Unintended (pregnancy not wanted at all); and Intended (pregnancy wanted at the time of conception or later). |
| Partner control behavior | A composite variable reflecting respondent self-reporting of five controlling behavior displayed by the husband/partner (is jealous if she talks to other men; accuses respondent of being unfaithfulness; does not permit respondent to meet female friends; tries to limit respondent’s contact with family; insists on knowing where respondent was), grouped into: No behavior displayed; 1–2 behavior displayed; 3 or more behavior displayed |
| Physical IPV | A composite binary variable measured by asking women’s if their husband ever did any of the seven following acts against her: pushed, shook or thrown something at her; slapped her; twisted arm or pulled her hair; punched her with fist or something that could hurt her; kicked, dragged or beat her; tried to choke or burn her on purpose; and, threatened or attacked her with any weapon such as knife, gun or any other weapon, grouped as: Yes (experiencing at least one of these seven acts); and No (not experiencing at all). |
| Sexual IPV | A composite binary variable measured based on three questions by asking women whether their husband ever: physically forced to have unwanted sexual relationships with him; physically forced to perform any other unwanted sexual acts; and, forced with threats and any other way to performs unwanted sexual acts, grouped as: Yes (experiencing any of these three acts): and No (not experiencing at all). |
| Emotional IPV | A composite binary variable created from the women’s responses to three questions by asking them whether their husband ever: humiliated her in front of others; threatened to hurt or harm her or someone close to her; and, insulted or made her feel bad about herself, grouped as: Yes (if women experienced any of these three acts); and No (not experienced at all). |
| Any IPV | A composite dichotomous summary measure created from 13 questions (physical IPV: 7, sexual IPV: 3, and emotional IPV: 3) to capture the women’s ever experience of any IPV (physical, sexual, and/or emotional), grouped as: Yes (‘yes’ response to any of these 13 questions); and No (‘no’ response to all of the 13 questions). |
Basic characteristics and rate (%) of utilization of maternal health service by socio-demographic, women’s autonomy and violence related characteristics, NDHS 2016 (n = 1361) a.
| Characteristics | Total # | Maternal Health Service Utilization | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sufficient ANC Visits #
| Institutional Delivery #
| ||
|
| |||
| Age group (in years) | |||
| 15–24 | 552 (40.6) | 404 (73.2) | 366 (66.3) |
| 25–34 | 664 (48.8) | 448 (67.5) | 374 (56.4) |
| 35–49 | 145 (10.6) | 79 (54.7) | 74 (51.4) |
| Caste/Ethnicity | |||
| Brahmin/Chhetri | 381 (28.0) | 301 (78.9) | 261 (68.6) |
| Janajati (Indigenous) | 462 (34.0) | 325 (70.4) | 288 (62.4) |
| Dalit | 200 (14.7) | 129 (64.7) | 108 (53.9) |
| Other castes | 317 (23.3) | 176 (55.4) | 157 (49.4) |
| Place of residence | |||
| Rural | 632 (46.4) | 384 (60.8) | 312 (49.4) |
| Urban | 729 (53.6) | 547 (75.1) | 502 (69.0) |
| Household wealth status | |||
| Poor | 580 (42.6) | 344 (59.3) | 242 (41.7) |
| Middle | 283 (20.8) | 185 (65.3) | 177 (62.7) |
| Rich | 497 (36.6) | 402 (80.9) | 395 (79.4) |
| Education differences | |||
| Both uneducated | 148 (10.9) | 61 (41.4) | 47 (31.7) |
| Both equally educated | 512 (37.6) | 416 (81.3) | 366 (71.5) |
| Husband better educated | 510 (37.5) | 313 (61.3) | 270 (52.9) |
| Wife better educated | 190 (14.0) | 141 (74.0) | 131 (69.0) |
| No of living children | |||
| 2 or fewer children | 975 (71.6) | 749 (76.9) | 683 (70.1) |
| 3 or more children | 386 (28.4) | 182 (47.1) | 131 (34.1) |
|
| |||
| Employment status | |||
| Not employed | 510 (37.5) | 343 (67.2) | 334 (65.5) |
| Employed but not for cash | 483 (35.5) | 336 (69.5) | 240 (49.7) |
| Employed for cash | 367 (27.0) | 253 (68.8) | 240 (65.3) |
| Exposure to media | |||
| No exposure | 603 (44.3) | 339 (56.3) | 286 (47.5) |
| Exposure | 758 (55.7) | 592 (78.1) | 528 (69.7) |
| Decision-making autonomy | |||
| No autonomy | 445 (32.7) | 293 (65.8) | 248 (55.7) |
| Medium autonomy | 470 (34.6) | 319 (67.9) | 294 (62.6) |
| High autonomy | 445 (32.7) | 319 (71.7) | 272 (61.1) |
| Attitude towards partner violence | |||
| Accepts violence (fully) | 35 (2.6) | 23 (66.2) | 21 (58.9) |
| Accepts violence (partially) | 361 (26.6) | 234 (64.7) | 202 (56.0) |
| Rejects violence | 964 (70.9) | 674 (69.9) | 592 (61.4) |
| Pregnancy intentions | |||
| Unintended | 122 (9.0) | 50 (40.8) | 50 (41.4) |
| Intended | 751 (91.0) | 882 (71.2) | 764 (61.7) |
|
| |||
| Partner control behavior | |||
| No behavior | 879 (64.6) | 631 (71.8) | 537 (61.1) |
| 1–2 behavior | 354 (26.0) | 221 (62.3) | 206 (58.2) |
| 3–5 behavior | 127 (9.4) | 80 (62.4) | 71 (55.8) |
| Physical IPV | |||
| No | 1067 (78.4) | 763 (71.5) | 678 (63.5) |
| Yes | 293 (21.6) | 168 (57.3) | 136 (46.5) |
| Sexual IPV | |||
| No | 1260 (92.6) | 875 (69.5) | 759 (60.2) |
| Yes | 101 (7.4) | 56 (55.6) | 56 (55.5) |
| Emotional IPV | |||
| No | 1193 (87.6) | 835 (70.0) | 728 (61.1) |
| Yes | 168 (12.4) | 96 (57.1) | 86 (51.3) |
| Any IPV | |||
| No | 1016 (74.7) | 729 (71.7) | 641 (63.1) |
| Yes | 345 (25.3) | 203 (58.8) | 173 (50.3) |
|
| |||
| Sufficient ANC visits | |||
| No (less than 4 visits) | 429 (31.6) | 146 (34.1) | |
| Yes (4 or more visits) | 931 (68.4) | 668 (71.7) | |
| Institutional delivery | |||
| No | 546 (40.1) | ||
| Yes | 815 (59.9) | ||
n: number. %: percentage. a Weighted sample size. # The number and percentage are adjusted for multi-stage sampling, cluster weight, and sample weight. P refers to a p-value of the Chi-square (χ2) test. * refers to a statistically significant association (p < 0.05) in the χ2 test. IPV: Intimate Partner Violence. ANC: Antenatal Care.
Factors associated with sufficient ANC visits among women in Nepal, NDHS 2016.
| Characteristics | Sufficient ANC Visits; AOR (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Alternative Model | |
|
| ||||
| Age group (years) | ||||
| 15–24 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 25–34 | 1.08 (0.74–1.57) | 1.04 (0.72–1.51) | 1.06 (0.74–1.53) | 1.06 (0.73–1.53) |
| 35–49 | 0.93 (0.55–1.58) | 1.02 (0.59–1.74) | 1.04 (0.60–1.80) | 1.03 (0.60–1.79) |
| Caste/Ethnicity | ||||
| Other castes | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Brahmin/Chhetri | 2.72 (1.67–4.41) | 2.55 (1.55–4.20) | 2.34 (1.42–3.84) | 2.34 (1.42–3.88) |
| Janajati (Indigenous) | 1.48 (0.89–2.46) | 1.40 (0.84–2.36) | 1.33 (0.79–2.23) | 1.33 (0.80–2.21) |
| Dalit | 1.79 (1.04–3.10) | 1.75 (0.99–3.08) | 1.70 (0.95–3.04) | 1.71 (0.96–3.03) |
| Place of residence | ||||
| Urban | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Rural | 0.70 (0.50–0.97) | 0.70 (0.50–0.97) | 0.69 (0.50–0.96) | 0.69 (0.50–0.95) |
| Household wealth status | ||||
| Rich | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Middle | 0.64 (0.41–1.00) | 0.67 (0.43–1.06) | 0.67 (0.43–1.06) | 0.68 (0.43–1.07) |
| Poor | 0.41 (0.28–0.60) | 0.48 (0.32–0.72) | 0.47 (0.31–0.70) | 0.47 (0.31–0.71) |
| Education differences | ||||
| Both uneducated | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Both equally educated | 2.55 (1.48–4.39) | 2.31 (1.32–4.05) | 2.31 (1.33–4.02) | 2.33 (1.33–4.06) |
| Husband better educated | 1.32 (0.82–2.13) | 1.27 (0.78–2.06) | 1.25 (0.77–2.03) | 1.26 (0.77–2.05) |
| Wife better educated | 1.83 (0.97–3.48) | 1.68 (0.88–3.23) | 1.68 (0.89–3.14) | 1.66 (0.88–3.13) |
| No of living children | ||||
| 3 or more children | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 or fewer children | 2.43 (1.68–3.52) | 2.03 (1.39–2.96) | 2.10 (1.44–3.08) | 2.10 (1.43–3.08) |
|
| ||||
| Exposure to media | ||||
| No exposure | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Exposure | 1.52 (1.09–2.12) | 1.50 (1.07–2.09) | 1.50 (1.08–2.10) | |
| Pregnancy intentions | ||||
| Unintended | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Intended | 2.02 (1.17–3.46) | 1.96 (1.13–3.40) | 1.97 (1.14–3.10) | |
|
| ||||
| Partner control behavior | ||||
| No behavior | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1–2 behavior | 0.64 (0.45–0.92) | 0.63 (0.44–0.89) | ||
| 3–5 behavior | 1.17 (0.64–2.13) | 1.01 (0.58–1.77) | ||
| Physical IPV | NA | |||
| No | 1 | |||
| Yes | 0.94 (0.56–1.58) | |||
| Sexual IPV | NA | |||
| No | 1 | |||
| Yes | 0.80 (0.40–1.57) | |||
| Emotional IPV | NA | |||
| No | 1 | |||
| Yes | 0.82 (0.47–1.42) | |||
| Any IPV | NA | |||
| No | 1 | |||
| Yes | 0.89 (0.58–1.35) | |||
| Nagelkerke’s R-square | 0.211 | 0.227 | 0.239 | 0.237 |
Model 1: Age group, ethnicity, province, household wealth status, and witnessing parental violence. Model 2: Husband/Partner education, husband/partner alcohol use, women afraid of husband, marital control behavior displayed by the husband. Model 3: Education of women, exposure to media, women’s cash earnings, ownership of property, attitude towards the autonomy of sexual rights, and attitude towards wife beating. 1—reference category, p = p-value of the variables obtained from the test of model effects, IPV: Intimate Partner Violence. ANC: Antenatal Care, AOR: Adjusted Odds Ratio, CI: Confidence Interval. All values are weighted for the multi-stage sampling, cluster weight, and sampling weight.
Factors associated with institutional delivery among women in Nepal, NDHS 2016.
| Characteristics | Institutional Delivery; AOR (95% CI) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Alternative Model | |
|
| |||||
| Age group (years) | |||||
| 15–24 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 25–34 | 0.87 (0.63–1.19) | 0.84 (0.60–1.16) | 0.85 (0.61–1.17) | 0.84 (0.60–1.18) | 0.83 (0.59–1.16) |
| 35–49 | 1.32 (0.80–2.20) | 1.29 (0.77–2.13) | 1.29 (0.77–2.15) | 1.34 (0.76–2.35) | 1.34 (0.76–2.35) |
| Caste/Ethnicity | |||||
| Other castes | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Brahmin/Chhetri | 2.79 (1.70–4.57) | 2.85 (1.73–4.70) | 2.54 (1.54–4.16) | 2.26 (1.37–3.72) | 2.36 (1.43–3.91) |
| Janajati (Indigenous) | 1.73 (1.07–2.77) | 1.70 (1.05–2.75) | 1.58 (0.96–2.59) | 1.51 (0.92–2.49) | 1.55 (0.94–2.56) |
| Dalit | 1.94 (1.12–3.37) | 1.94 (1.11–3.38) | 1.83 (1.05–3.20) | 1.68 (0.95–2.96) | 1.70 (0.97–3.00) |
| Place of residence | |||||
| Urban | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Rural | 0.64 (0.45–0.89) | 0.64 (0.45–0.90) | 0.63 (0.45–0.88) | 0.67 (0.47–0.96) | 0.68 (0.48–0.96) |
| Household wealth status | |||||
| Rich | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Middle | 0.62 (0.42–0.94) | 0.66 (0.43–1.00) | 0.68 (0.45–1.03) | 0.72 (0.47–1.12) | 0.71 (0.46–1.11) |
| Poor | 0.19 (0.13–0.28) | 0.22 (0.15–0.34) | 0.23 (0.16–0.35) | 0.26 (0.17–0.39) | 0.25 (0.17–0.38) |
| Education differences | |||||
| Both uneducated | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Both equally educated | 1.90 (1.10–3.26) | 1.98 (1.14–3.41) | 1.94 (1.10–3.39) | 1.62 (0.96–2.75) | 1.63 (0.97–2.76) |
| Husband better educated | 1.22 (0.71–2.09) | 1.33 (0.77–2.27) | 1.31 (0.75–2.27) | 1.21 (0.72–2.04) | 1.22 (0.73–2.05) |
| Wife better educated | 2.09 (1.12–3.91) | 2.16 (1.15–4.05) | 2.17 (1.14–4.12) | 1.95 (1.04–3.65) | 1.94 (1.04–3.62) |
| No of living children | |||||
| 3 or more children | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 or fewer children | 2.85 (2.07–3.94) | 2.86 (2.00–4.10) | 2.82 (1.98–4.03) | 2.51 (1.70–3.69) | 2.52 (1.71–3.71) |
|
| |||||
| Employment | |||||
| Employed for cash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Unemployed | 0.79 (0.54–1.17) | 0.77 (0.52–1.14) | 0.80 (0.54–1.18) | 0.80 (0.53–1.20) | |
| Employed, not for cash | 0.61 (0.43–0.86) | 0.58 (0.41–0.82) | 0.53 (0.38–0.75) | 0.54 (0.38–0.77) | |
| Exposure to media | |||||
| No exposure | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Exposure | 1.13 (0.82–1.55) | 1.13 (0.81–1.57) | 1.03 (0.73–1.44) | 1.02 (0.73–1.43) | |
| Pregnancy intentions | |||||
| Unintended | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Intended | 0.97 (0.56–1.68) | 0.95 (0.56–1.61) | 0.78 (0.45–1.37) | 0.79 (0.45–1.38) | |
|
| |||||
| Physical IPV | NA | ||||
| No | 1 | 1 | |||
| Yes | 0.65 (0.44–0.95) | 0.67 (0.47–0.96) | |||
| Any IPV | NA | NA | |||
| No | 1 | ||||
| Yes | 0.79 (0.55–1.15) | ||||
|
| |||||
| Sufficient ANC visits | |||||
| No (<4 visits) | 1 | 1 | |||
| Yes (≥4 visits) | 3.06 (2.20–4.26) | 3.07 (2.21–4.26) | |||
| Nagelkerke’s R-square | 0.299 | 0.306 | 0.311 | 0.358 | 0.355 |
Model 1: Age group, ethnicity, province, household wealth status, and witnessing parental violence. Model 2: Husband/Partner education, husband/partner alcohol use, women afraid of husband, marital control behavior displayed by the husband. Model 3: Education of women, exposure to media, women’s cash earnings, ownership of property, attitude towards the autonomy of sexual rights, and attitude towards wife beating. 1—reference category, p = p-value of the variables obtained from the test of model effects, IPV: Intimate Partner Violence. ANC: Antenatal Care, AOR: Adjusted Odds Ratio, CI: Confidence Interval. All values are weighted for the multi-stage sampling, cluster weight, and sampling weight.