| Literature DB >> 26264412 |
Dilaram Acharya1, Vishnu Khanal2,3, Jitendra Kumar Singh4, Mandira Adhikari5, Salila Gautam6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Antenatal care has several benefits for expecting mothers and birth outcomes; yet many mothers do not utilise this service in Nepal. Mass media may play an important role in increasing the use of antenatal care and other maternal health services. However, the effect of mass media on increasing health service utilisation has remained an under studied area in Nepal. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of mass media on the utilisation of antenatal care services in rural Nepal.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26264412 PMCID: PMC4534014 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-015-1312-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
Exposure of mass media as a source of information about health
| Mass media | Numbera | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Radio | 122 | 59.52 |
| Television | 89 | 43.41 |
| Printed materials | 61 | 29.75 |
| Wall paintings | 58 | 28.29 |
| Newspaper | 34 | 16.58 |
| Health workers | 59 | 28.78 |
| None | 83 | 40.48 |
aMultiple response; recorded as at least once a week.
Characteristics of the respondents among exposed and not exposed to mass media within a week
| Characteristics | Total number (%) | Exposed (n = 122) | Not exposed (n = 83) | P value* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (in years) | ||||
| <20 | 46 (22.43) | 25 (20.5) | 21 (25.3) | 0.174 |
| 20–35 | 133 (64.8) | 85 (69.7) | 48 (57.8) | |
| >35 | 26 (12.68) | 12 (9.8) | 14 (16.9) | |
| Caste/ethnicity | ||||
| Dalit | 43 (20.97) | 12 (9.8) | 31 (37.3) | <0.001 |
| Janjati | 22 (10.73) | 9 (7.4) | 13 (15.7) | |
| Non Dalit Tarai caste | 87 (42.43) | 60 (49.2) | 27 (32.5) | |
| Upper caste group | 53 (25.85) | 41 (33.6) | 12 (14.5) | |
| Educational status | ||||
| No education | 91 (44.39) | 37 (30.3) | 54 (65.1) | <0.001 |
| Primary | 40 (19.51) | 28 (23.0) | 12 (14.5) | |
| Some secondary | 47 (22.92) | 36 (29.5) | 11 (13.3) | |
| SLC and above | 27 (13.17) | 21 (17.2) | 6 (7.2) | |
| Occupation | ||||
| Agriculture | 161 (78.53) | 97 (79.5) | 64 (77.1) | 0.107 |
| Business/service | 24 (11.70) | 17 (13.9) | 7 (8.4) | |
| Labor | 20 (9.75) | 8 (6.6) | 12 (14.5) | |
| Standard of Living Index (SLI) | ||||
| Low | 41 (20) | 15 (12.3) | 26 (31.3) | <0.001 |
| Middle | 131 (63.90) | 92 (75.4) | 39 (47.0) | |
| High | 33 (16.09) | 15 (12.3) | 18 (21.7) | |
| Total | 205 | 122 | 83 | |
* P-value from Chi-square test
Utilization of selected antenatal care services among participants exposed and unexposed to mass media within a week (unadjusted odds ratio)
| Services | Exposed n./total (%) (n = 122) | Not exposed n./total (%) (n = 83) | OR (95 % CI) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANC Visit (yes vs. no) | 98/122 (80.3) | 40/83 (48.2) | 4.39 (2.36–8.16) | <0.01 |
| Freq. of ANC (≥4 vs. <4) | 38/98 (38.77) | 7/40 (17.5) | 2.98 (1.2–7.4) | 0.016 |
| Nutritional supplementation and de-worming | ||||
| Additional food consumed | 104/122 (85.2) | 57/83 (68.7) | 2.63 (1.33–5.21) | 0.005 |
| Iron and folic acid taken | 93/98 (94.89) | 31/40 (77.5) | 5.40 (1.68–17.33) | 0.002 |
| De-worming | 32/98 (32.65) | 12/40 (30.0) | 1.13 (0.51–2.51) | 0.762 |
| TT immunization | 106/122 (86.9) | 46/83 (55.4) | 5.32 (2.69–10.52) | <0.001 |
| Rest and sleep | 65/122 (53.3) | 23/83 (27.7) | 2.97 (1.63–5.40) | <0.001 |
| Physical and laboratory examination | ||||
| Weight measured | 72/98 (73.46) | 27/40 (67.5) | 1.84 (0.87–3.89) | 0.48 |
| Blood pressure measured | 72/98 (73.46) | 19/40 (47.5) | 3.06 (1.42–6.58) | 0.003 |
| Urine sample tested | 60/98 (61.22) | 22/40 (55.5) | 2.38 (0.90–6.28) | 0.499 |
| Blood sample tested | 66/98 (67.34) | 25/40 (62.5) | 1.23 (0.57–2.66) | 0.586 |
| Ultrasonography done | 47/98 (47.95) | 10/40 (25.0) | 2.76 (1.22–6.26) | 0.013 |
| ANC provider (skilled vs. unskilled)a | 82/98 (63.67) | 25/40 (62.5) | 3.07 (1.33–7.08) | 0.007 |
| Total | 122 | 83 | ||
n. frequency.
aSkilled Health Personnel: Doctor/HA/AHW/ANM/Nurse. Chi square test of association.
Effect of mass media exposure on the utilisation of ANC using logistic regression model
| Variables | Regression coefficient | SE | OR | 95 % CI | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANC visit (yes vs. no) | 1.837 | 0.932 | 6.28 | 1.01–38.99 | 0.049 |
| Rest and sleep | 0.976 | 0.434 | 2.65 | 1.13–6.21 | 0.025 |
| TT immunization | 1.633 | 0.726 | 5.12 | 1.23–21.24 | 0.024 |
Variables entered for ANC visits (yes vs no), rest and sleep, TT immunization, education, occupation and SLI.