| Literature DB >> 35981007 |
Seman K Ousman1,2, Mekdes K Gebremariam2, Johanne Sundby3, Jeanette H Magnus3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Women exposed to Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) often do not utilize maternal health care optimally both because of stigma and other social problems. The current study aims to explore an association between maternal healthcare seeking and violence exposure among Ethiopian women and to assess if educational attainment and wealth status moderate this association.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35981007 PMCID: PMC9387817 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273146
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.752
Fig 1Prevalence of maternal healthcare service use among women’s who reported exposure to intimate partner violence in Ethiopia (2016, EDHS).
Sociodemographic characteristics and exposure to IPV by utilization of maternal healthcare services among (2836)aa women in the 2016 Ethiopian Demographic Health Survey.
| Maternal Health Service Utilization | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Types of maternal healthcare | ANC | Place of delivery | ||
| Adequate ANC visits | Inadequate ANC visitsb | Home | Health facility | |
| Mean age (Year) (±SD) | 28.7 (±6.2) | 29.3 (±6.7) | 29.6 (±6.7) | 28.2 (±6.2) |
|
| 856 (30.2%) | 1980 (69.8%) | 1871 (66.0%) | 965 (34%) |
|
| ||||
| Yes (23.1%) | 23.6 | 76.4 | 69.7 | 30.3 |
| No (76.9%) | 32.2 | 67.8 | 64.9 | 35.1 |
|
| ||||
| Yes (23.4%) | 27.4 | 72.6 | 69.9 | 30.1 |
| No (76.6%) | 31.0 | 69.0 | 64.8 | 35.2 |
|
|
| |||
| Yes (9.4%) | 22.4 | 77.6 | 67.9 | 32.1 |
| No (90.6%) | 31.0 | 69.0 | 65.8 | 34.2 |
|
|
| |||
| Yes (29.8%) | 27.5 | 72.5 | 72.5 | 27.5 |
| No (70.2%) | 31.3 | 68.7 | 63.2 | 36.8 |
|
| ||||
|
|
| |||
| 15–24 (22.4%) | 28.2 | 71.8 | 57.5 | 42.5 |
| 25–34 (51.7%) | 33.1 | 66.9 | 66.5 | 33.5 |
| 35–49 (25.9%) | 26.1 | 73.9 | 66.0 | 34.0 |
|
|
|
| ||
| First (18.2%) | 38.6 | 61.4 | 42.5 | 57.5 |
| Second or third (30.2%) | 34.5 | 65.5 | 59.2 | 40.8 |
| Fourth or higher (51.6%) | 24.7 | 75.3 | 78.2 | 21.8 |
|
|
|
| ||
| No education (64.2%) | 23.1 | 76.9 | 77.3 | 22.7 |
| Primary and above (35.8%) | 42.9 | 57.1 | 45.7 | 54.3 |
|
|
|
| ||
| No education (48.4%) | 21.7 | 78.3 | 76.8 | 23.2 |
| Primary and above (51.6%) | 38.4 | 61.6 | 55.8 | 44.2 |
|
|
|
| ||
| Low household wealth status (43.1%) | 20.4 | 79.6 | 79.1 | 20.9 |
| Medium household status (22.4%) | 31.2 | 68.8 | 29.8 | 70.2 |
| High household Wealth status (34.5%) | 41.7 | 58.3 | 46.9 | 53.1 |
|
|
|
| ||
| No exposure (67.2%) | 24.1 | 75.9 | 74.4 | 25.6 |
| Exposed to either radio or TV (19.2%) | 37.9 | 62.1 | 56.9 | 43.1 |
| Exposed to both radio and TV (13.5%) | 49.6 | 50.4 | 37.1 | 62.9 |
|
| ||||
|
|
| |||
| Accepts violence (fully) (69.0%) | 35.4 | 64.6 | 61.6 | 38.4 |
| Rejects violence (31.0%) | 27.6 | 72.4 | 68.2 | 31.8 |
|
|
|
| ||
| No autonomy (10.0%) | 12.8 | 87.2 | 80.6 | 19.4 |
| Medium autonomy (22.0%) | 32.9 | 76.1 | 63.2 | 36.8 |
| High autonomy (68.1%) | 32.1 | 67.9 | 64.6 | 35.4 |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
| ||
| Urban (12.1%) | 59.4 | 40.6 | 14.8 | 85.2 |
| Rural (87.9%) | 26.2 | 73.8 | 73.0 | 27.0 |
|
|
|
| ||
| Agrarian (91.4%) | 29.2 | 70.8 | 66.9 | 33.1 |
| Pastoralist (5.8%) | 22.6 | 77.4 | 77.8 | 22.2 |
| City dweller’s (2.8%) | 77.6 | 22.4 | 12.0 | 88.0 |
Note: a) P refers to a p-value of the Chi-squared test(X2); b) Inadequate—less than four ANC visits; Adequate & Inadequate ANC visits are additive. c) Total figure may not add to 100 percent due to “do not know” and “missing cases; aaWeighted sample size.
Multiple multilevel logistic regression for association between maternal ever exposure to different forms of IPV and use of maternal healthcare services for currently married women.
| ANC Visits & Place of delivery (weighted) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Adequate ANC visits | Health facility delivery | |
| AOR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | |
|
| ||
| No (ref) (76.9%) | 1 (1,1) | 1 (1,1) |
| Yes (23.1%) |
| 1.16 (0.86, 1.57) |
|
| ||
| No (ref) (76.6%) | 1 (1,1) | 1 (1,1) |
| Yes (23.4%) | 0.95 (0.74, 1.23) | 0.88 (0.66, 1.18) |
|
| ||
| No (ref) (90.6%) | 1 (1,1) | 1 (1,1) |
| Yes (9.4%) | 0.68 (0.46, 1.01) | 1.42 (0.93, 2.17) |
|
| ||
| No (ref) (70.2%) | 1 (1,1) | 1 (1,1) |
| Yes (29.8%) | 0.78 (0.54, 1.14) | 0.60 (0.36, 1.00) |
| Intraclass Correlation Coefficient | 0.26 | 0.44 |
| Akaike Information Criterion | 2793.60 | 2370.00 |
Note: sig. at **sig. at 5% level; ref = reference group; CI = Confidence Interval; IPV = Intimate Partner Violence; ANC = Antenatal Care; AOR = Adjusted Odds ratios. Models adjusted for: Mother’s age, birth order, mother’s education, husband’s education, wealth status, media exposure, decision making autonomy, place of residence, and contextual regions.
Association between ever exposure to physical/any forms of IPV, and utilization of antenatal care and the moderating effect of education and wealth.
| Adequate ANC Visits N = 2863 (weighted) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| education x physical IPV Model | wealth x physical IPV Model | |||||
| Characteristics | AOR (95% CI) |
| Characteristics | AOR (95% CI) |
| |
| Yes X Primary and above | 1.29 (0.76, 2.18) | Yes X Medium wealth index | 0.75 (0.40, 1.40) | |||
| Yes X High wealth index |
|
| ||||
| Yes X Primary and above |
|
| Yes X Medium wealth index | 1.40 (0.72, 2.72) | ||
| Yes X High wealth index | 1.56 (0.83, 2.94) | |||||
| Coefficient Akaike Information Criterion | 2800.18 | 2797.20 | ||||
Note: **sig. at 5% level; CI = Confidence Interval; ANC = Antenatal Care; AOR = Adjusted Odds ratios. Models adjusted for: Mother’s age, birth order, mother’s and husband’s education or household wealth index, media exposure, decision making autonomy, place of residence, and contextual regions.
Association between ever exposure to Sexual IPV, and utilization of health facility delivery and the moderating effect of education and wealth.
| Health Facility delivery N = 2863 (weighted) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| education x sexual IPV Model | wealth x sexual IPV Model | ||||
| Characteristics | AOR (95% CI) |
| Characteristics | AOR (95% CI) |
|
| Yes X Primary and above | 0.81 (0.34, 1.94) | Yes X Medium wealth index |
|
| |
| Yes X High wealth index | 1.45 (0.52, 4.10) | ||||
| Coefficient Akaike Information Criterion |
|
| |||
Note
**sig. at 5% level; CI = Confidence Interval; ANC = Antenatal Care; AOR = Adjusted Odds ratios. Models adjusted for: Mother’s age, birth order, mother’s and husband’s education or household wealth index, media exposure, decision making autonomy, place of residence, and contextual regions.