| Literature DB >> 30870464 |
Zachary M Burcham1, Carl J Schmidt2, Jennifer L Pechal3, Christopher P Brooks1, Jason W Rosch4, M Eric Benbow3,5, Heather R Jordan1.
Abstract
Population-based public health data on antibiotic resistance gene carriage is poorly surveyed. Research of the human microbiome as an antibiotic resistance reservoir has primarily focused on gut associated microbial communities, but data have shown more widespread microbial colonization across organs than originally believed, with organs previously considered as sterile being colonized. Our study demonstrates the utility of postmortem microbiome sampling during routine autopsy as a method to survey antibiotic resistance carriage in a general population. Postmortem microbial sampling detected pathogens of public health concern including genes for multidrug efflux pumps, carbapenem, methicillin, vancomycin, and polymixin resistances. Results suggest that postmortem assessments of host-associated microbial communities are useful in acquiring community specific data while reducing selective-participant biases.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30870464 PMCID: PMC6417727 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213280
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Metagenomic bacterial genera community relative abundance.
The relative genera taxonomic level abundance of bacterial communities detected in each case. The highest detected genera in terms of total percentages were Pseudomonas (17.7%), Porphyromonas (13.4%), and Staphylococcus (11.5%). Genera that constituted less than 3% of sample were grouped as rare taxa to reduce sampling noise. Relative abundances were determined using MetaPhlAn v2.0.
Fig 2Linear relationship of the metagenomic ARGs as a function of bacterial richness.
The dotted slope estimate based on the theoretical model suggests a linear relationship between bacterial richness and the number of resistance genes in the community with a zero intercept and a slope equal to pN = 7.66e−04 · 2122 = 1.63. The solid slope estimate from a linear regression on the empirical data estimates the slope is 1.67.
Table showing identified ARGs among cases using whole genome shotgun sequencing (WGSS) and qPCR assays.
| Case | WGSS Genes Present | qPCR Genes Present |
|---|---|---|
| mdtE, tet38 | Not Tested | |
| acrB, acrS, arlR, arlS, blaZ, mdtL, mepA, mepR, msbA, sav1866, tet38, tetQ | Not Tested | |
| No Detection | Not Tested | |
| Not Tested | aadA1, SHV, DHA, qnr-23 Group, ermB, mefA, tetB, vanB | |
| aadA, acrF, arnA, cfxA, ermF, ermX, mdtE, mdtO, tetM, tetO, tetW | Not Tested | |
| Not Tested | SHV(156G), SHV(238G240E), ermB, ermC, mefA, msrA, mecA | |
| acrB, arnA, mexB, mexE, mexF, mexK, muxC, oqxB | Not Tested | |
| Not Tested | IMI/NMC-A, SHV(156G), SHV(238S240K), ACT5/7 Group, ermB, ermC, mefA, msrA | |
| cfxA, EF-Tu, ermF, hmrM, ileS, mefA, mel, mtrD, parY, patB, | msrA | |
| pmrA, rlmA(II), TEM, tetA46, tetA60, tetB46, tetB60, tetM, tetQ | ||
| cfxA, EF-Tu, ermB, ermF, farA, farB, hmrM, ileS, macA, macB, | SFO-1, SHV(238S240K), ermB, ermC, mefA, msrA | |
| mefA, mel, mtrD, mtrR, patB, pmrA, rlmA(II), tetA60, tetB60, tetM | ||
| Not Tested | SHV, SHV(156G), SHV(238G240E), MOX, ermB, ermC, mefA, msrA, tetA, tetB, mecA | |
| cfxA, ermF, lsaC, tet32, tetM, tetQ | ermB, ermC, mefA, msrA, tetA | |
| acrB, arnA, cfxA, cpxR, ermF, ermX, mefA, mel, mexA, mexB, mexC, | SHV(238S240K), ermB, mefA, msrA, mecA | |
| mexD, mexE, mexF, mexI, mexK, mexN, mexP, mexQ, mexW, mexY/amrB, | ||
| mexY/amrB, muxB, opmH, oprM, PDC, pmpM, smeE, tetQ, tetW, triA, triC | ||
| acrD, arnA, cfxA, cpxR, EF-Tu, ermB, ermF, ermX, lsaC, mefA, mel, mexB, | SHV(156G), ermB, ermC, mefA, msrA, vanB, mecA | |
| mexC, mexD, mexE, mexF, mexI, mexK, mexN, mexP, mexQ, mexW, mexY/amrB, | ||
| muxB, opmH, oprM, patB, pmpM, rlmA(II), smeB, tetA60, tetM, tetO, tetW, triA, triC | ||
| acrB, acrF, pmrE, tetW | SHV(156G), SHV(238S240K), ACT 5/7 Group, MOX, OXA-50 Group, | |
| OXA-51 Group, ermB, ermC, mefA, msrA, vanB, mecA | ||
| cpxR | SHV, SHV(156G), SHV(238G240E), MOX, OXA-50 Group, ermB, mefA, oprJ, oprM | |
| Not Tested | SHV, SHV(156G), SHV(238G240E), MOX | |
| mprF, tetA(P), tetB(P) | SHV, SHV(156G), SHV(238G240E), MOX, ermB, ermC, mefA, msrA, mecA | |
| No Detection | ermB, ermC, mefA, msrA, mecA | |
| No Detection | SHV, SHV(156G), SHV(238G240E), MOX, | |
| ermB, ermC, mefA, msrA, tetA, tetB, vanB, mecA | ||
| No Detection | SHV, SHV(156G), SHV(238G240E), ermB, ermC, mefA, msrA, tetB | |
| blaZ, cfxA, ermB, hmrM, mefA, mel, patB, pmrA, | Not Tested | |
| rlmA(II), TEM, tetK, tetB46, tetM, tetO, tetW, tetX, vgaA | ||
| ermF, lsaC, TEM, tetM, tetQ, tetT, tetW | Not Tested | |
| aad(6), ant(6)-Ia, aph(3')-Ia, aph(3')-IIIa, cfxA, EF-Tu, ermC, | Not Tested | |
| ermF, ermG, ermX, ileS, mecR1, parY, sat-4, tetM, tetO, tetQ, tetW | ||
| aad(6), ant(6)-Ia, aph(3')-IIIa, arlS, blaB, blaZ, cfxA, EF-Tu, ermA, | Not Tested | |
| ermC, ermF, ermX, ileS, lsaC, mecR1, mefA, mphC, mtrA, norA, parY, | ||
| qacA, qacA/qacB, sat-4, tetK, tetM, tetO, tetQ, tetW, tetX, vgaA | ||
| Not Tested | ermB, mefA, msrA, mecA | |
| Not Tested | aac(6)-Ib-cr, aadA1, ermB, ermC, mefA, msrA, mecA | |
| Not Tested | aadA1, DHA, OXA-51 Group, ermB, mefA, msrA, tetB | |
| Not Tested | ermB, mefA, msrA, tetB, mecA |
Fig 3Heatmap visualization of ARGs identified from each case’s metagenome.
Resistance genes to streptogramins, streptothricins, aminocoumarins, pseudomonic acids, (poly)peptides, aminoglycosides, elfamycins, phenols, fluoroquinolones, beta-lactams, macrolides, tetracyclines, and multidrug efflux pumps were identified. The color and numbers represent the range of genes found to inhibit antibiotic classes. Blue indicates no detection and red the highest detection.
Fig 4Heatmap visualization of genes related to particular antibiotic classes found in each case through using ARG qPCR arrays.
Resistance genes to fluoroquinolones, multidrug efflux pumps, aminoglycosides, glycopeptides, tetracyclines, beta-lactams, and macrolides were discovered. Color and numbers represent the range of abundance of genes found to inhibit antibiotic classes. Blue represents no detection and red the highest detection.
Hypotheses for the distribution of ARGs in the community.
| Pr[z] = Pr[x]∙Pr[y] | Genus Richness | RA Genes∙Taxon-1 |
|---|---|---|