| Literature DB >> 30867507 |
Bao-Lin Xiao1, Yan-Na Ning1, Nan-Nan Niu1, Di Li1, Ali Akbar Moosavi-Movahedi2, Nader Sheibani3, Jun Hong4,5.
Abstract
The conformational lock was a bio-thermodynamic theory to explain the characteristics of interfaces in oligomeric enzymes and their effects on catalytic activity. The previous studies on superoxide dismutases (Cu, Zn-SODs) showed that the dimeric structure contributed to the high catalytic efficiency and the stability. In this study, steered molecular dynamics simulations were used firstly to study the main interactions between two subunits of Cu, Zn-SODs. The decomposition process study showed that there were not only four pairs of hydrogen bonds but also twenty-five residue pairs participating hydrophobic interactions between A and B chains of SOD, and van der Waals interactions occupied a dominant position among these residue pairs. Moreover, the residue pairs of hydrogen bonds played a major role in maintaining the protein conformation. The analysis of the energy and conformational changes in the SMD simulation showed that there were two groups (two conformational locks) between A and B chains of SOD. The first group consisted of one hydrogen-bond residues pair and seven hydrophobic interactions residues pairs with a total average energy of -30.10 KJ/mol, and the second group of three hydrogen-bond residues pair and eighteen hydrophobic interactions residues pairs formed with a total average energy of -115.23 KJ/mol.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30867507 PMCID: PMC6416402 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-40892-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) The RMSD of the carbon atoms in the protein backbone relative to the initial frame against simulation time. (b) RMS distribution of clusters during last 50 ns.
Figure 2Spring constant and pulling velocity. (a) Influence of the spring constant on the steering force of SOD. (b) Calculated rupture forces as a function of pulling velocity (Vpull). The error bars give estimated uncertainties.
Figure 3Energy and conformational changes of SOD during SMD simulation. (a) Time dependence of the interaction energy between A chain and B chain of SOD. (b) The RMSD of the carbon atoms in the protein backbone relative to the initial frame.
Figure 4Hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions between A and B chains of SOD. By DIMPLOT programs of LigPlot+ v1.4.5.
Average interaction energies of Hydrogen-bond residues during SMD simulation.
| Residues pair | Electrostatic energy (kJ/mol) | Vdw energy (kJ/mol) | Total energy(kJ/mol) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ile149A-Gly49B | −14.42 | −1.66 | −16.08 |
| Ile149A-Gly112B | −10.21 | −3.33 | −13.54 |
| Ile149B-Gly49A | −15.32 | −0.65 | −15.97 |
| Ile149B-Gly112A | −9.62 | −2.48 | −12.10 |
| Total | −49.57 | −8.12 | −57.69 |
Figure 5Changes in the interaction energy over time for relevant residues during SMD simulation. (a) The interaction energy between Ile149B and Gly49A. (b) The interaction energy between Ile149B and Gly112A. (c) The interaction energy between Ile149A and Gly49B. (d) The interaction energy between Ile149A and Gly112B. (e) The total energy between Ile149B and Gly112A. (f) The total energy between Ile149B and Gly49A, Ile149A and Gly49B, Ile149A and Gly112B.
Average interaction energies of hydrophobic interactions during SMD simulation.
| Residues pair | Electrostatic energy(kJ/mol) | vdW energy(kJ/mol) | Total energy (kJ/mol) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Val5A-Gly49B | 1.51 | −1.94 | −0.43 |
| Val5A-Asp50B | −0.25 | −2.86 | −3.11 |
| Val7A-Asn51B | 0.13 | −2.96 | −2.83 |
| Val7A-Thr52B | −0.02 | −2.08 | −2.10 |
| Thr17A-Thr52B | 0.05 | −1.43 | −1.37 |
| Phe48A-Ala150B | −1.33 | −3.34 | −4.67 |
| Phe48A-Lys151B | 1.52 | −5.42 | −3.90 |
| Gly49A-Val5B | 1.01 | −1.87 | −0.86 |
| Gly49A-Gly148B | −0.62 | −2.36 | −2.97 |
| Asp50A-Val5B | −0.22 | −2.65 | −2.87 |
| Asn51A-Val7B | 0.62 | −3.02 | −2.40 |
| Thr52A-Val7B | 0.03 | −2.04 | −2.02 |
| Ile111A-Gly112B | −0.07 | −1.81 | −1.88 |
| Ile111A-Ile149B | −0.42 | −1.94 | −2.36 |
| Gly112A-Ile111B | −0.05 | −1.84 | −1.89 |
| Gly112A-Gly148B | −3.45 | −1.57 | −5.02 |
| Arg113A-Ile149B | −1.01 | −5.85 | −6.86 |
| Val146A-Gly148B | 0.03 | −1.31 | −1.29 |
| Gly148A-Gly49B | −0.67 | −2.49 | −3.16 |
| Gly148A-Gly112B | −3.32 | −1.81 | −5.13 |
| Ile149A-Phe48B | −3.85 | −6.17 | −10.02 |
| Ile149A-Ile111B | −0.34 | −2.32 | −2.66 |
| Ile149A-Arg113B | −0.51 | −5.39 | −5.89 |
| Ala150A-Phe48B | −1.80 | −3.83 | −5.62 |
| Lys151A-Phe48B | −0.52 | −5.83 | −6.34 |
| Total | −13.55 | −74.10 | −87.65 |
Figure 6Energy Changes of hydrophobic interactions during SMD simulation. (a) The energy changes between 7 pairs of residues. (b) The total energy changes between 7 pairs of residues. (c) The energy changes between 25 pairs of residues. (d) The total energy changes between 25 pairs of residues.
Two groups of conformation lock.
| Group | Amino acid residue pair | Total energy (kJ/mol) |
|---|---|---|
| I | Ile149A-Gly112B, Val7A-Asn51B, Val7A-Thr52B, Thr17A-Thr52B, Gly49A-Gly148B, Asp50A-Val5B, Asn51A-Val7B, Thr52A-Val7B | −30.10022723 |
| II | Ile149A-Gly49B, Ile149B-Gly49A, Ile149B-Gly112A, Val5A-Gly49B, Val5A-Asp50B, Phe48A-Ala150B, Phe48A-Lys151B, Gly49A-Val5B, Ile111A-Gly112B, Ile111A-Ile149B, Gly112A-Ile111B, Gly112A-Gly148B, Arg113A-Ile149B, Val146A-Gly148B, Gly148A-Gly49B, Gly148A-Gly112B, Ile149A-Phe48B, Ile149A-Ile111B, Ile149A-Arg113B, Ala150A-Phe48B, Lys151A-Phe48B | −115.234948 |
Figure 7Hydrophobic interactions during the SMD simulation in SOD. Three cores around residues of Gly49, Gly112 and Ile149.
Figure 8Dissociation of mutants during the SMD simulations. (a) COM distance between chain A and chain B of wild type(WT) and six mutants. (b) Pull force between chain A and chain B of wild type and six mutants. (c) Electrostatic energy of wild type and mut-Gly49. (d) vdW energy of wild type and mut-Gly49. (e) Electrostatic energy of wild type and mut-Gly112. (f) vdW energy of wild type and mut-Gly112. (g) Electrostatic energy of wild type and mut-Ile149. (h) vdW energy of wild type and mut-Ile149.