| Literature DB >> 30866954 |
Charles-Henri Malbert1, Mickael Genissel2, Jean-Louis Divoux3, Christine Henry4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/Entities:
Keywords: Animal model; Bariatric surgery; Connectivity analysis; DAT; PET imaging; SERT; SPECT imaging; Vagal stimulation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30866954 PMCID: PMC6417219 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-019-1831-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Fig. 1Evolution in body weight gain for sham and abdominal vagal stimulated groups (top left panel). Note that body weight relative to the pre-operative one was significantly reduced in the stimulated group after 45 days of continuous stimulation. This reduction was a consequence of both a diminished daily food intake (top right panel) and an increased resting energy expenditure (bottom right panel). The decreased body weight in the stimulated group was representative of a reduced visceral fat (bottom left panel)
Statistical parameter mapping analysis of activation patterns (local maxima) obtained from 18FDG PET scan in stimulated animals compared to sham
| Coordinate of local maximum (x, y, z in mm) | Pcorrected (voxel level) | T-value (voxel level) | Tentative anatomic localization |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2, − 11, − 8 | 0.001 | 7.46 | Periaqueducal grey |
| − 4, − 6, − 6 | 0.001 | 6.96 | Periaqueducal grey |
| 6, 9, − 2 | 0.001 | 6.32 | Ventral anterior thalamus R |
| − 0, 9, − 9 | 0.003 | 5.46 | Medial hypothalamic area |
| − 18, 7, − 4 | 0.002 | 6.06 | Amygdala L |
| − 10, 28, − 6 | 0.004 | 4.88 | Insula L |
The analysis was performed with the cluster size of 100 voxels. Values of P were presented using FDR correction. Tentative anatomic localization is given based on interpretation of the projection of the activation pattern on the pig brain anatomic atlas published by our group [22]
Fig. 2Statistical parameter mapping of 18FDG uptake (CMRglu) in sham and stimulated group. SPM analysis was performed using pixel-wise modeled quantitative PET images. Statistical differences were analyzed using T-test in SPM12, P < 0.001 FDR and cluster level corrected. The analysis was performed with a cluster size of 100 voxels each of the cluster representing 1 mm3. Note the activation in the thalamic and periaqueducal grey areas. Top left—brain glass with activation in shade of grey. Top right—thresholded activation (in color scale) depicting the ventral anterior thalamic activation. Bottom left—3D representation of the activation matrix. Shade of red indicates activation. Bottom right—thresholded activation (in color scale) with the image centered on the periaqueducal grey
Fig. 3Metabolic connectivity analysis in the sham and stimulated groups. A. The figures showed the results of connectivity analysis performed with NetPET software using CMRglu coded voxel-vised images. Top panels—surface renderings of the brain overlaid with network connections. Nodes and edges were coded using BrainNet viewer and edges were thresholded for P < 0.001. Only nodes with attached edges were represented. Bottom panels—Correlograms representing the correlation weighted matrices thresholded at P < 0.001. Nodes’ abbreviations are expended in the Additional file 1: Table S1. Note the increased metabolic connectivity in stimulated compared to sham group
Fig. 4Left panels—examples of reconstructed normalized volumes obtained after the administration of 123I ioflupane in sham versus stimulated animals. The colors represented pixel-wise modeled SPECT dynamic image series according to Ichise i.e., the binding potential overlaid on the MRI template of the pig brain atlas. Red VOIs corresponded to DAT-rich areas whereas yellow VOIs represented SERT-rich areas. Right panel—binding potential for DAT and SERT in sham versus stimulated groups obtained from region-based analysis. *Indicates a significant difference at P < 0.001